World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3715
World Ranking
10655
National Ranking
614

Job Fransen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Job Fransen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Job Fransen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Job Fransen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Differences in physical fitness and gross motor coordination in boys aged 6–12 years specializing in one versus sampling more than one sport

    Job Fransen;Johan Pion;Joric Vandendriessche;Barbara Vandorpe

  • Characteristics of high-level youth soccer players: variation by playing position

    Dieter Deprez;Job Fransen;Jan Boone;Matthieu Lenoir

  • A retrospective study on anthropometrical, physical fitness, and motor coordination characteristics that influence dropout, contract status, and first-team playing time in high-level soccer players aged eight to eighteen years.

    Dieter N. Deprez;Job Fransen;Mattieu Lenoir;Renaat Marie Philippaerts

  • Generic anthropometric and performance characteristics among elite adolescent boys in nine different sports

    Johan Pion;Veerle Segers;Job Fransen;Gijs Debuyck

  • Relative age, biological maturation and anaerobic characteristics in elite youth soccer players.

    Dieter Deprez;AJ Coutts;Job Fransen;Frederik Deconinck

  • Motor competence assessment in children: convergent and discriminant validity between the BOT-2 Short Form and KTK testing batteries

    Job Fransen;Eva D’Hondt;Jan Bourgois;Roel Vaeyens

  • Stature and Jumping Height Are Required in Female Volleyball, but Motor Coordination Is a Key Factor for Future Elite Success

    Johan A. Pion;Job Fransen;Dieter N. Deprez;Veerle Segers

  • Changes in physical fitness and sports participation among children with different levels of motor competence: a 2-year longitudinal study.

    Job Fransen;Dieter Deprez;Johan Pion;Isabel B Tallir

  • A longitudinal study of multidimensional performance characteristics related to physical capacities in youth handball.

    Stijn P.J. Matthys;Roel Vaeyens;Job Fransen;Dieter Deprez

  • Reliability and validity of the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 in young soccer players

    Dieter Deprez;Aaron James Coutts;Matthieu Lenoir;Job Fransen

  • Association between sports participation, motor competence and weight status: a longitudinal study

    Rafael S. Henrique;Alessandro Hervaldo Nicolai Ré;David F. Stodden;Job Fransen

  • Differences in biological maturation, anthropometry and physical performance between playing positions in youth team handball

    Stijn P.J. Matthys;Job Fransen;Roel Vaeyens;Matthieu Lenoir

  • Esports: The Chess of the 21st Century

    Matthew A. Pluss;Kyle J. M. Bennett;Andrew R. Novak;Derek Panchuk;Derek Panchuk

  • Mental Fatigue in Football: Is it Time to Shift the Goalposts? An Evaluation of the Current Methodology

    Chris J Thompson;Job Fransen;Sabrina Skorski;Mitchell R Smith

  • Creating a framework for talent identification and development in emerging football nations

    Kyle J.M. Bennett;Roel Vaeyens;Job Fransen

  • Improving the Prediction of Maturity From Anthropometric Variables Using a Maturity Ratio

    Job Fransen;Stephen Bush;Stephen Woodcock;Andrew Novak

  • Impact of mental fatigue on speed and accuracy components of soccer-specific skills

    Mitchell R. Smith;Job Fransen;Dieter Deprez;Matthieu Lenoir

  • The use of small-sided games to assess skill proficiency in youth soccer players: a talent identification tool

    Kyle J. M. Bennett;Andrew R. Novak;Matthew A. Pluss;Christopher J. Stevens

  • The Applicability of a Short Form of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder for Measuring Motor Competence in Children Aged 6 to 11 Years

    Andrew R. Novak;Kyle J.M. Bennett;Adam Beavan;Johan Pion

  • The rise and fall of executive functions in high-level football players.

    Adam Beavan;Adam Beavan;Jan Spielmann;Jan Mayer;Sabrina Skorski

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles