World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
29295
World Ranking
10958
National Ranking
344

David B. Pyne publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David B. Pyne sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 425 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David B. Pyne D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David B. Pyne sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David B. Pyne is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia and specializes in research within the field of Medicine, with a prominent focus on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Physiology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Rehabilitation.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several papers published between 2020 and 2021. Key works include "An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity" (2020) in Sports Medicine, "The athletic gut microbiota" (2020) in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, "Training During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices of 12,526 Athletes from 142 Countries and Six Continents" (2021) in Sports Medicine, "Methods of performance analysis in team invasion sports: A systematic review" (2020) in the Journal of Sports Sciences, and "Impairments to Thermoregulation in the Elderly During Heat Exposure Events" (2020) in Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine.

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Ricardo J. Fernandes
  • Andrew J. McKune
  • Naroa Etxebarria
  • Iñigo Mujika
  • Jad Adrian Washif

The scientist's work is regularly published in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
  • Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Biology of Sport
  • Sports
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Their research addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Sports Analytics and Performance

David B. Pyne's work contributes to the understanding and development of methodologies and knowledge that span physiological responses, training adaptations, injury prevention, and sports performance optimization, among other areas.

Best Publications

  • Factors Affecting Running Economy in Trained Distance Runners

    Philo U. Saunders;Philo U. Saunders;David B. Pyne;Richard D. Telford;John A. Hawley

  • Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union.

    Grant Duthie;Grant Duthie;David Pyne;Sue Hooper

  • Position statement. Part two: Maintaining immune health.

    Neil P. Walsh;Michael Gleeson;David B. Pyne;David C. Nieman

  • The Physical and Physiological Demands of Basketball Training and Competition

    Paul Montgomery;David B. Pyne;Clare Leslie Minahan

  • Warm-Up Strategies for Sport and Exercise: Mechanisms and Applications.

    Courtney J. McGowan;David B. Pyne;David B. Pyne;Kevin G. Thompson;Ben Rattray

  • Salivary IgA levels and infection risk in elite swimmers.

    Maree Gleeson;Warren McDONALD;David Pyne;Allan Cripps

  • Regulation of Neutrophil Function During Exercise

    David B. Pyne

  • Evaluation of the Lactate Pro blood lactate analyser.

    David B. Pyne;Tanya Boston;David T. Martin;Andrew Logan

  • The effect on immunity of long-term intensive training in elite swimmers.

    M Gleeson;W A McDonald;A W Cripps;D B Pyne

  • Design and Interpretation of Anthropometric and Fitness Testing of Basketball Players

    Eric J. Drinkwater;David B. Pyne;Michael J. McKenna

  • Quantifying movement demands of AFL football using GPS tracking

    Ben Wisbey;Paul G. Montgomery;David B. Pyne;David B. Pyne;Ben Rattray

  • Incidence, Etiology, and Symptomatology of Upper Respiratory Illness in Elite Athletes

    Luke Spence;Wendy J. Brown;David B. Pyne;Michael D. Nissen;Michael D. Nissen;Michael D. Nissen

  • Time motion analysis of 2001 and 2002 super 12 rugby

    Grant Duthie;David Pyne;Sue Hooper

  • The effect of recovery strategies on physical performance and cumulative fatigue in competitive basketball

    Paul G Montgomery;David B Pyne;Will G Hopkins;Jason C Dorman

  • Can exercise affect immune function to increase susceptibility to infection

    Richard J Simpson;John P Campbell;Maree Gleeson;Karsten Krüger

  • Improved running economy in elite runners after 20 days of simulated moderate-altitude exposure.

    Philo U Saunders;Richard D Telford;David B Pyne;R. B Cunningham

  • The effects of fatigue on decision making and shooting skill performance in water polo players.

    Kylie A. Royal;Damian Farrow;Iñigo Mujika;Shona L. Halson

  • Physiological Changes Associated with the Pre-Event Taper in Athletes

    Iñigo Mujika;Sabino Padilla;David Pyne;Thierry Busso

  • Exercise-induced muscle damage and inflammation: a review.

    Pyne Db

  • Monitoring the lactate threshold in world- ranked swimmers

    David B. Pyne;Hamilton Lee;Kim M. Swanwick

Frequent Co-Authors

Will G. Hopkins
Will G. Hopkins Victoria University
Louise M. Burke
Louise M. Burke Australian Catholic University
Allan W. Cripps
Allan W. Cripps Griffith University
Christopher J. Gore
Christopher J. Gore Australian Institute of Sport
Mark S. Baker
Mark S. Baker Macquarie University
Michael Gleeson
Michael Gleeson Loughborough University
John S. Raglin
John S. Raglin Indiana University
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
David Bishop
David Bishop Victoria University
Michael J. McKenna
Michael J. McKenna Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine or healthcare doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to medical school. Numerous how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs resources detail ways to advance your career in healthcare leadership, especially if you’re interested in non-clinical roles. These programs help you build management expertise in medical settings.

If you’re already a registered nurse seeking flexibility, you can consider the rn to bsn online with no clinicals option. This route allows nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree with minimal interruption to their work schedules or family life.

For nurses aiming for the highest educational tier, pursuing advanced degrees such as the Doctor of Nursing Practice is possible through expedited options like the shortest msn to dnp program. There are also user-friendly dnp programs for those balancing busy careers and educational goals.

Online pathways offer flexibility and targeted learning, making them ideal for working professionals or those changing careers. Carefully research your options to find a program that aligns with your personal career vision.

Best Scientists Citing David B. Pyne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles