World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
33703
World Ranking
7741
National Ranking
231

Tim J. Gabbett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Gabbett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 323 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tim J. Gabbett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Gabbett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim J. Gabbett is affiliated with the University of Southern Queensland in Australia, contributing extensively to the field of Medicine with a focus on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Their work spans 115 publications primarily situated within this medical discipline, including significant contributions to subfields such as Occupational Therapy, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sports Injuries and Prevention
  • Occupational Health and Performance
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Their publication record features articles in several frequent venues, highlighting a focus on multidisciplinary approaches and practical sports science. These venues include:

  • Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
  • Sports
  • Sports Medicine
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
  • Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Recent papers authored by or involving Tim J. Gabbett illustrate an emphasis on workload management, wearable technology, and developmental training models within sports contexts. Selected recent titles are:

  • Effects of and Response to Mechanical Loading on the Knee, 2021, Sports Medicine
  • Is the Acute: Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR) Associated with Risk of Time-Loss Injury in Professional Team Sports? A Systematic Review of Methodology, Variables and Injury Risk in Practical Situations, 2020, Sports Medicine
  • Wearable Technology and Analytics as a Complementary Toolkit to Optimize Workload and to Reduce Injury Burden, 2021, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
  • Developmental Training Model for the Sport Specialized Youth Athlete: A Dynamic Strategy for Individualizing Load-Response During Maturation, 2021, Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
  • Wearable Sensor Technology to Predict Core Body Temperature: A Systematic Review, 2022, Sensors

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Gábor Schuth
  • György Szigeti
  • Alija Pašíć
  • G. Pavlik
  • James Wallace

Best Publications

  • The training—injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?

    Tim J Gabbett

  • Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement.

    Pitre C. Bourdon;Marco Cardinale;Andrew Murray;Paul Gastin

  • How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness

    Martin Peter Schwellnus;Torbjørn Soligard;Juan-Manuel Alonso;Roald Bahr;Roald Bahr

  • The acute:chronic workload ratio predicts injury: high chronic workload may decrease injury risk in elite rugby league players

    Billy T. Hulin;Timothy James Gabbett;Daniel W. Lawson;Peter Caputi

  • Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers

    Billy T Hulin;Tim J Gabbett;Peter Blanch;Paul Chapman

  • Time-Motion Analysis of Small-Sided Training Games and Competition in Elite Women Soccer Players

    Tim J Gabbett;Mike J Mulvey

  • Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute:chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a player's risk of subsequent injury

    Peter Blanch;Tim J Gabbett

  • Relative importance of strength, power, and anthropometric measures to jump performance of elite volleyball players.

    Jeremy M. Sheppard;John B. Cronin;Timothy James Gabbett;Michael R. McGuigan

  • Physical demands of professional rugby league training and competition using microtechnology.

    Tim J. Gabbett;Tim J. Gabbett;David G. Jenkins;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy

  • The use of wearable microsensors to quantify sport-specific movements

    Ryan Chambers;Tim J. Gabbett;Tim J. Gabbett;Michael H. Cole;Adam Beard

  • Small-sided games in team sports training: a brief review.

    Jamel Halouani;Hamdi Chtourou;Tim J. Gabbett;Anis Chaouachi

  • Training and game loads and injury risk in elite Australian footballers.

    Brent Rogalski;Brian Dawson;Jarryd Heasman;Timothy Gabbett

  • Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of Australian junior national, state, and novice volleyball players.

    Tim Gabbett;Boris Georgieff

  • CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    João Gustavo Claudino;João Gustavo Claudino;Tim J. Gabbett;Frank Bourgeois;Helton de Sá Souza

  • Physiological characteristics of junior and senior rugby league players

    T J Gabbett

  • An Analysis of Playing Positions in Elite Men's Volleyball: Considerations for Competition Demands and Physiologic Characteristics

    Jeremy M. Sheppard;Tim J. Gabbett;Luiz Cláudio Reeberg Stanganelli

  • How do training and competition workloads relate to injury? The workload—injury aetiology model

    Johann Windt;Tim J Gabbett

  • Influence of training and match intensity on injuries in rugby league.

    Tim J Gabbett

  • Relationships between training load, injury, and fitness in sub-elite collision sport athletes.

    Tim J. Gabbett;Nathan Domrow

  • The acute:chonic workload ratio in relation to injury risk in professional soccer

    Shane Malone;Adam Owen;Matt Newton;Bruno Mendes

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
Robert U. Newton
Robert U. Newton Edith Cowan University
Karim Chamari
Karim Chamari Naufar Center
Caroline F. Finch
Caroline F. Finch Edith Cowan University
Lars Engebretsen
Lars Engebretsen Oslo University Hospital
Roald Bahr
Roald Bahr Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Peter O'Sullivan
Peter O'Sullivan Curtin University
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Peter Caputi
Peter Caputi University of Wollongong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a range of related fields and flexible online programs. For those interested in holistic health, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can be a solid choice, combining science with practical skills for roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health.

If you’re considering the administrative side of healthcare, knowing how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is crucial. Look for accreditation, curriculum strength, and outcome data to ensure you choose a quality program that employers recognize.

Nurses looking to advance can now enroll in an rn to bsn with no clinicals program. These online pathways provide flexibility and remove barriers, making it easier for working professionals to complete their degrees while balancing job responsibilities.

For advanced practice nurses, the shortest post master's dnp program options offer a fast track to leadership and clinical expertise. These streamlined doctorates can help you achieve top credentials in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Tim J. Gabbett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles