World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
34841
World Ranking
13937
National Ranking
1289

Paul Roderick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Roderick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 568 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Roderick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Roderick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Roderick is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers on the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Nephrology, Economics and Econometrics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their recent published papers highlight research across public health and nephrology topics. Notable works include:

  • "Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey," 2022, published in PLoS ONE
  • "Impact of Covid-19 on health-related quality of life of patients: A structured review," 2021, published in PLoS ONE
  • "Universal weekly testing as the UK COVID-19 lockdown exit strategy," 2020, published in The Lancet
  • "Ethnic minority disparities in progression and mortality of pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic scoping review," 2020, published in BMC Nephrology
  • "School reopening without robust COVID-19 mitigation risks accelerating the pandemic," 2021, published in The Lancet

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Simon Fraser, Nisreen A Alwan, Nida Ziauddeen, Hajira Dambha-Miller, and Maarten W. Taal.

Their scholarly contributions have appeared repeatedly in various publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • BMJ Open
  • PLoS ONE
  • British Journal of General Practice

Paul Roderick's work addresses several key topics within healthcare research including:

  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Healthcare innovation and challenges
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Best Publications

  • Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor;Mark Woodward

  • Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice, and reported to national surveillance

    Jeremy G Wheeler;Dinesh Sethi;John M Cowden;Patrick G Wall

  • Noninvasive markers of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Validating the European Liver Fibrosis Panel and exploring simple markers.

    Indra Neil Guha;Julie Parkes;Paul Roderick;Dipanker Chattopadhyay

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Josef Coresh;Yingying Sang;John Chalmers

  • Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes

    Robin Poole;Oliver J Kennedy;Paul Roderick;Jonathan A Fallowfield

  • Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review.

    Janet A. Butler;Paul Roderick;Mark Mullee;Juan C. Mason

  • Prednisolone or Pentoxifylline for Alcoholic Hepatitis

    Mark R. Thursz;Paul Richardson;Michael Allison;Andrew Austin

  • Age and Association of Kidney Measures With Mortality and End-stage Renal Disease

    Stein I. Hallan;Kunihiro Matsushita;Yingying Sang;Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi;Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi

  • Cigarette smoking by socioeconomic group, sex, and age: effects of price, income, and health publicity

    J Townsend;P Roderick;J Cooper

  • A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma

    S Kelly;K M Harris;E Berry;J Hutton

  • Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in the North Thames Dialysis Study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study.

    Donna L Lamping;Niculae Constantinovici;Paul Roderick;Charles Normand

  • A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease

    Nicholas Drey;Paul Roderick;Mark Mullee;Mary Rogerson

  • A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy

    J Dinnes;J Deeks;J Kirby;P Roderick

  • The impact of stroke on informal carers : a literature review.

    Joseph T.S Low;Sheila Payne;Paul Roderick

  • Towards evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: Systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylaxis

    P Roderick;G Ferris;K Wilson;H Halls

  • Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease

    Julie Parkes;Paul Roderick;Scott Harris;Christopher Day

  • Meta-analysis identifies multiple loci associated with kidney function–related traits in east Asian populations

    Y. Okada;X. Sim;X. Sim;M. J. Go;J. Y. Wu;J. Y. Wu

  • Genetic loci influencing kidney function and chronic kidney disease

    John C Chambers;Weihua Zhang;Graham M Lord;Graham M Lord;Pim van der Harst

  • Estimating kidney function in adults using formulae

    Edmund J. Lamb;Charles R.V. Tomson;Paul J. Roderick

  • Performance of serum marker panels for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

    Julie Parkes;Indra Neil Guha;Paul Roderick;William Rosenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

John Feehally
John Feehally University of Leicester
Andrew Davenport
Andrew Davenport University College London
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Yoav Ben-Shlomo University of Bristol
Christopher P. Day
Christopher P. Day Newcastle University
Saul N. Faust
Saul N. Faust University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Nick S. Macklon
Nick S. Macklon University of Copenhagen
John Cairns
John Cairns London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Astrid E. Fletcher
Astrid E. Fletcher London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Stuart C. Clarke
Stuart C. Clarke University of Southampton
Laura C. Rodrigues
Laura C. Rodrigues London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up several online degree options, especially in nursing. For those seeking advanced roles, enrolling in one of the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs can help you qualify as a nurse practitioner while minimizing education costs.

If you're starting your nursing education, there are affordable online nursing programs designed for flexibility and accessibility. Completing an RN license is often a first milestone, and to further your qualifications, the cheapest online rn to bsn programs allow working nurses to earn a bachelor's degree affordably and at their own pace.

For those interested in leadership or academia, advanced study is possible through the cheapest phd nursing programs, which provide pathways to research and teaching careers.

Whether you are just beginning your journey or looking to specialize, these online nursing programs help streamline your career pathway in the medical field while keeping education costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Roderick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles