World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
33
Citations
7894
World Ranking
9327
National Ranking
2614

Piotr Grodzinski publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Grodzinski sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Piotr Grodzinski D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Grodzinski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2014 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Piotr Grodzinski is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and specializes in fields related to Engineering and Materials Science, with a specific focus on Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. Their research spans multiple subfields including Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics.

Their main topics of work concentrate on areas such as:

  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques

Piotr Grodzinski has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • Merging data curation and machine learning to improve nanomedicines (2022, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews)
  • Critical review of nucleic acid nanotechnology to identify gaps and inform a strategy for accelerated clinical translation (2021, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews)
  • Nanotechnology for Cancer Imaging: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Opportunities (2021, Radiology Imaging Cancer)
  • Nanotechnology Tools Enabling Biological Discovery (2022, ACS Nano)
  • Nanomaterials innovation as an enabler for effective cancer interventions (2020, Biomaterials)

The venues where Piotr Grodzinski frequently publishes include:

  • Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
  • Radiology Imaging Cancer
  • ACS Nano
  • Biomaterials

They often collaborate with several co-authors, notably:

  • Marina A. Dobrovolskaia
  • Christina Liu
  • Carolina Salvador-Morales
  • Weina Ke
  • Leela Rani Avula

Among recognitions, Piotr Grodzinski was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2019 and a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Challenges and Key Considerations of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Nanomedicine Drug Delivery in Oncology

    Uma Prabhakar;Hiroshi Maeda;Rakesh K. Jain;Eva M. Sevick-Muraca

  • Self-contained, fully integrated biochip for sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and DNA microarray detection.

    Robin Hui Liu;Jianing Yang;Ralf Lenigk;Justin Bonanno

  • PROCEDIMIENTO DE FABRICACION DE DISPOSITIVOS MICROFLUIDICOS MULTICAPA INTEGRADOS.

    Burdon Jeremy W;Huang Rong-Fong;Wilcox David;Naclerio Nicholas J

  • Bubble-induced acoustic micromixing

    Robin H. Liu;Jianing Yang;Maciej Z. Pindera;Mahesh Athavale

  • Hybridization enhancement using cavitation microstreaming.

    Robin Hui Liu;Ralf Lenigk;Roberta L. Druyor-Sanchez;Jianing Yang

  • Nanobiotechnology: the promise and reality of new approaches to molecular recognition.

    Paolo Fortina;Larry J. Kricka;Saul Surrey;Piotr Grodzinski

  • Microfabricated polycarbonate CE devices for DNA analysis.

    Yingjie Liu;Dale Ganser;Alan Schneider;Robin Liu

  • Best Practices in Cancer Nanotechnology: Perspective from NCI Nanotechnology Alliance

    William C. Zamboni;Vladimir Torchilin;Anil K. Patri;Jeff Hrkach

  • Nanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care

    Christopher M. Hartshorn;Michelle S. Bradbury;Gregory M. Lanza;Andre E. Nel

  • DNA Amplification and Hybridization Assays in Integrated Plastic Monolithic Devices

    Yingjie Liu;Cory B. Rauch;Randall L. Stevens;Ralf Lenigk

  • Microfluidic devices for high gradient magnetic separation

    Michael Ward;Piotr Grodzinski;Robin Liu;Bradley Engel

  • Nanotechnology for cancer diagnostics: promises and challenges.

    Piotr Grodzinski;Mike Silver;Linda K Molnar

  • Ingestible electronic capsule

    Vijay Nair;Piotr Grodzinski;Nada A. El-Zein;Herbert Goronkin

  • Multilayered microfluidic devices for analyte reactions

    Cynthia G. Briscoe;Jeremy W. Burdon;Tony Chan;Barbara Foley

  • Single-use, thermally actuated paraffin valves for microfluidic applications

    Robin H. Liu;Justin Bonanno;Jianing Yang;Ralf Lenigk

  • High sensitivity PCR assay in plastic micro reactors

    Jianing Yang;Yingjie Liu;Cory B Rauch;Rauch L Stevens

  • Enhanced mixing in microfluidic devices

    Robin Liu;Ralf Lenigk;Pankaj Singhal;Piotr Grodzinski

  • Experimental study of Auger recombination, gain, and temperature sensitivity of 1.5 mu m compressively strained semiconductor lasers

    Y. Zou;J.S. Osinski;P. Grodzinski;P.D. Dapkus

  • Big Potential from Small Agents: Nanoparticles for Imaging-Based Companion Diagnostics.

    Emily B. Ehlerding;Piotr Grodzinski;Weibo Cai;Christina H. Liu

  • Microfluidic devices with monolithic microwave integrated circuits

    Barbara Foley Barenburg;Jeremy Burdon;Yuk-Tong Chan;Xunhu Dai

  • A Modular Microfluidic System for Cell Pre-concentration and Genetic Sample Preparation

    P. Grodzinski;J. Yang;R.H. Liu;M.D. Ward

  • Integrating Nanotechnology into Cancer Care.

    Piotr Grodzinski;Moritz Kircher;Michael Goldberg;Alberto Gabizon

  • Plastic biochannel hybridization devices: a new concept for microfluidic DNA arrays.

    Ralf Lenigk;Robin H Liu;Mahesh Athavale;Zhijian Chen

  • Merging Data Curation and Machine Learning to Improve Nanomedicines.

    Unknown

  • Nanotechnology-Based Cancer Therapeutics—Promise and Challenge—Lessons Learned Through the NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer

    Dorothy Farrell;Krzysztof Ptak;Nicholas J. Panaro;Piotr Grodzinski

  • Recent Advances from the National Cancer Institute Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer

    Dorothy Farrell;Joe Alper;Krzystof Ptak;Nicholas J. Panaro

  • Low-threshold-current-density 1.5 mu m lasers using compressively strained InGaAsP quantum wells

    J.S. Osinski;Y. Zou;P. Grodzinski;A. Mathur

Frequent Co-Authors

P.D. Dapkus
P.D. Dapkus University of Southern California
Alberto Gabizon
Alberto Gabizon Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Paolo Fortina
Paolo Fortina Thomas Jefferson University
Andre E. Nel
Andre E. Nel University of California, Los Angeles
Elena P. Ivanova
Elena P. Ivanova RMIT University
Saul Surrey
Saul Surrey Thomas Jefferson University
Ming C. Wu
Ming C. Wu University of California, Berkeley
Julie A. Schneider
Julie A. Schneider Rush University Medical Center
Mauro Ferrari
Mauro Ferrari Houston Methodist
Yuliang Zhao
Yuliang Zhao National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that can help you expand your skills and opportunities. With the rapid pace of technological change, professionals in STEM fields increasingly benefit from business, legal, and administrative expertise.

For those interested in advancing into management roles, top accelerated mba programs offer a fast-track option to gain leadership skills and business knowledge. Engineering students looking for an edge in legal or compliance-related roles may find the paralegal accelerated program especially valuable to understand regulations and contract management.

Enhanced administrative skills are also in demand across technical industries. Taking bookkeeping courses can add vital financial literacy to your toolkit, essential for project management and entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, office management degrees provide foundational knowledge in communications, operations, and technology use within organizations.

Exploring these programs can open new doors, whether you want to lead teams, start a business, or manage the practical aspects of engineering work.

Best Scientists Citing Piotr Grodzinski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles