World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
11003
World Ranking
3562
National Ranking
1709

Michael S Wilkes publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S Wilkes sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Michael S Wilkes D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S Wilkes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael S Wilkes is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research spans a variety of topics within the field of medicine, with a particular focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, oncology, surgery, genetics, and biomedical engineering.

Wilkes's work encompasses several key areas including telemedicine and telehealth implementation, healthcare technology and patient monitoring, impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare, adventure sports and sensation seeking, injury epidemiology and prevention, healthcare operations and scheduling optimization, and CAR-T cell therapy research.

They have published multiple papers recently, including:

  • Future trends in measuring physiology in free-living animals, 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The Lake Louise Score: A Critical Assessment of Its Specificity, 2020, High Altitude Medicine & Biology
  • Telemedicine for Patient Management on Expeditions in Remote and Austere Environments: A Systematic Review, 2021, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
  • Early and Consistent CRS Detection Using Wearable Device for Remote Patient Monitoring Following CAR-T Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Early Results of an Investigator-Initiated Trial, 2023, Blood
  • Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations, 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Wilkes include Nicole Zahradka, Juliana Pugmire, Adam Wolfberg, and Sridevi Rajeeve. These collaborations appear across various studies and publications, reflecting cross-disciplinary efforts.

Their work has been published frequently in notable venues such as Blood, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, JMIR Formative Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Best Publications

  • Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.

    Frank Davidoff;Catherine D. DeAngelis;Jeffrey M. Drazen;John Hoey

  • Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions.

    Malathi Srinivasan;Michael S Wilkes;Frazier Stevenson;Thuan Nguyen

  • Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.

    Frank Davidoff;Catherine D. DeAngelis;Jeffrey M. Drazen;John Hoey

  • Influence of Patients’ Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Richard L Kravitz;Ronald M. Epstein;Mitchell D. Feldman;Carol E. Franz

  • Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make.

    Jeffrey D. Robinson;Marc N. Elliott;Megan Beckett

  • Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: trends, impact, and implications

    Michael S. Wilkes;Robert A. Bell;Richard L. Kravitz

  • Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Leading Medical Journals: Experts' Assessments

    Michael S. Wilkes;Bruce H. Doblin;Martin F. Shapiro

  • Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.

    Davidoff F;DeAngelis Cd;Drazen Jm;Nicholls Mg

  • Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising and the public.

    Robert A. Bell;Richard L. Kravitz;Michael S. Wilkes

  • Rwanda 20 years on: investing in life

    Agnes Binagwaho;Paul E. Farmer;Sabin Nsanzimana;Corine Karema

  • Evaluating educational interventions

    Michael S Wilkes;J. Bligh

  • The educational value of consumer-targeted prescription drug print advertising.

    Robert A Bell;Michael S Wilkes;Richard L Kravitz

  • VALUE OF NECROPSY IN ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME

    Michael S Wilkes;Michael S Wilkes;Juan C. Felix;Juan C. Felix;Auguste H. Fortin;Auguste H. Fortin;Thomas A. Godwin;Thomas A. Godwin

  • Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising, 1989-1998. A content analysis of conditions, targets, inducements, and appeals.

    Robert A. Bell;Richard L. Kravitz;Michael S. Wilkes

  • Medical scientists and health news reporting: a case of miscommunication.

    Miriam Shuchman;Michael S. Wilkes

  • Advertisement-induced prescription drug requests: patients' anticipated reactions to a physician who refuses.

    Robert A. Bell;Michael S. Wilkes;Richard L. Kravitz

  • Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability

    Frank Davidoff;Catherine D DeAngelis;Jeffrey M Drazen;John Hoey

  • Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives and Patient Safety: A Comparative Prospective Study of Information Quality in Canada, France and the United States

    Barbara Mintzes;Joel Lexchin;Jason M. Sutherland;Marie Dominique Beaulieu

  • Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals

    Richelle J. Cooper;Malkeet Gupta;Michael S. Wilkes;Jerome R. Hoffman

  • Learning to value ethnic diversity--what, why and how?

    Joe Kai;John Spencer;Michael S Wilkes;Paramjit Gill

  • Health News Reporting: Reply

    Miriam Schuchman;Michael S. Wilkes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey M. Drazen
Jeffrey M. Drazen Harvard University
Richard L. Kravitz
Richard L. Kravitz University of California, Davis
Patricia A. Conrad
Patricia A. Conrad University of California, Davis
Robert A. Bell
Robert A. Bell University of California, Davis
Steven M. Asch
Steven M. Asch Stanford University
Agnes Binagwaho
Agnes Binagwaho Harvard University
Paul Farmer
Paul Farmer Harvard University
Joseph P. Newhouse
Joseph P. Newhouse Harvard University
Roberto M. La Ragione
Roberto M. La Ragione University of Surrey
Jonna A. K. Mazet
Jonna A. K. Mazet University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students are now turning to online degree programs for their flexibility and affordability. For those aiming to work as licensed counselors, cacrep-accredited online counseling programs provide a trusted pathway to state licensure and a range of roles in mental health.

If your interests involve working with families or couples, pursuing an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy is a popular and rewarding choice. Psychology remains one of the most versatile fields in the social sciences. There are several affordable online psychology degrees available, making it accessible for students at various budget levels.

Those passionate about community advocacy or clinical social work should consider the easiest msw online program options, which can be more attainable for applicants. Each of these online degree pathways offers flexibility that helps students balance studies with work or family commitments, while opening doors to impactful careers across the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S Wilkes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles