D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 34 Citations 13,616 81 World Ranking 3284 National Ranking 577

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Linguistics
  • Social science

His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Linguistics, Conversation, Class and Action. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Semi-structured interview, Interview and Applied psychology. Paul Drew conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Linguistics and Communication source through his research.

His work carried out in the field of Conversation brings together such families of science as Face-to-face interaction, Order, Interpersonal interaction and Psychoanalysis. His Class research spans across into fields like Sequential organization, Realization, Embodied cognition, Public relations and Multimodality. His research in Action intersects with topics in Modal verb, Contingency, Politeness, Wonder and British English.

His most cited work include:

  • Talk at work : interaction in institutional settings (1162 citations)
  • Analyzing talk at work: an introduction (676 citations)
  • 'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation (439 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Paul Drew spends much of his time researching Conversation analysis, Conversation, Linguistics, Social psychology and Epistemology. Paul Drew interconnects Nursing, Psychiatry, Discourse analysis and Public relations in the investigation of issues within Conversation analysis. His research in Discourse analysis focuses on subjects like Sociolinguistics, which are connected to Social relation.

In general Conversation study, his work on Turn-taking often relates to the realm of Sequential organization, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His Communication research extends to the thematically linked field of Linguistics. His Social psychology research includes themes of Context and Action.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Conversation analysis (31.20%)
  • Conversation (26.40%)
  • Linguistics (24.80%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Conversation analysis (31.20%)
  • Linguistics (24.80%)
  • Conversation (26.40%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Conversation analysis, Linguistics, Conversation, Dementia and Memory clinic. Many of his research projects under Conversation analysis are closely connected to Coding with Coding, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His study on Epistemics also encompasses disciplines like

  • Rebuttal together with Epistemology,
  • Attribution which connect with Social relation.

He combines subjects such as Social psychology, Accountability and Newspaper with his study of Linguistics. His Social psychology research integrates issues from Boundary and Theory of Forms. Paul Drew focuses mostly in the field of Conversation, narrowing it down to topics relating to Nursing and, in certain cases, Healthcare providers and Patient advocacy.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction (138 citations)
  • Conversational assessment in memory clinic encounters: interactional profiling for differentiating dementia from functional memory disorders (75 citations)
  • Epistemics in social interaction (43 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Linguistics
  • Social science

Paul Drew mostly deals with Conversation analysis, Linguistics, Social relation, Action and Embodied cognition. The study incorporates disciplines such as Test, Patient satisfaction and Family medicine in addition to Conversation analysis. His Linguistics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Public discourse and Newspaper.

Paul Drew has researched Action in several fields, including Multimodality, Social psychology, Public relations and British English. As part of his studies on Cross linguistic, Paul Drew often connects relevant areas like Conversation. He performs integrative study on Conversation and Relevance.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Analyzing talk at work: an introduction

Paul Drew.
(1992)

2447 Citations

Talk at work : interaction in institutional settings

Paul Drew.
Contemporary Sociology (1994)

1840 Citations

'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation

Paul Drew.
Journal of Pragmatics (1997)

868 Citations

'Am I not answering your questions properly?' : Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews

A Irvine;Paul Drew;Roy Derek Sainsbury.
Qualitative Research (2013)

832 Citations

Po-faced receipts of teases

Paul Drew.
Linguistics (1987)

684 Citations

Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting

Traci S. Curl;Paul Drew.
Research on Language and Social Interaction (2008)

642 Citations

Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct

Paul Drew.
Research on Language and Social Interaction (1998)

590 Citations

Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints

Paul Drew;Elizabeth Holt.
Social Problems (1988)

510 Citations

Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation

Paul Drew;Elizabeth Holt.
Language in Society (1998)

458 Citations

Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals.

Paul Drew;John Chatwin;Sarah Collins.
Health Expectations (2001)

342 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Paul Drew

Markus Reuber

Markus Reuber

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Publications: 52

Elizabeth Stokoe

Elizabeth Stokoe

Loughborough University

Publications: 45

Jonathan Potter

Jonathan Potter

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Publications: 35

Charles Antaki

Charles Antaki

Loughborough University

Publications: 32

Michael Haugh

Michael Haugh

University of Queensland

Publications: 29

Douglas W. Maynard

Douglas W. Maynard

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Publications: 27

Jeffrey D. Robinson

Jeffrey D. Robinson

Portland State University

Publications: 25

Lorenza Mondada

Lorenza Mondada

University of Basel

Publications: 22

Anssi Peräkylä

Anssi Peräkylä

University of Helsinki

Publications: 21

Celia Kitzinger

Celia Kitzinger

University of York

Publications: 20

Derek Edwards

Derek Edwards

Loughborough University

Publications: 20

Tanya Stivers

Tanya Stivers

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 17

Christian Heath

Christian Heath

King's College London

Publications: 16

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

University of Helsinki

Publications: 15

Gabriele Kasper

Gabriele Kasper

University of Hawaii at Manoa

Publications: 12

N. J. Enfield

N. J. Enfield

University of Sydney

Publications: 11

Something went wrong. Please try again later.