World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfgang Viechtbauer

Wolfgang Viechtbauer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 66 936 814 40 37 208 31085

Wolfgang Viechtbauer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wolfgang Viechtbauer between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wolfgang Viechtbauer published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2020. 24 of the 277 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2020. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

277 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wolfgang Viechtbauer: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 7
2010 5
2011 5
2012 17
2013 8
2014 22
2015 20
2016 15
2017 18
2018 21
2019 21
2020 25
2021 25
2022 19
2023 12
2024 13
2025 11
Total 277
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Viechtbauer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Viechtbauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 208 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 208
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Viechtbauer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Viechtbauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68 66
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Wolfgang Viechtbauer is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with significant work in experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, physiology, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's contributions address several main topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Wolfgang Viechtbauer has published extensively in various academic venues. Some of the frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Addiction
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Research Synthesis Methods
  • ERJ Open Research

Among their recent papers are the following works:

  • The Effects of Sampling Frequency and Questionnaire Length on Perceived Burden, Compliance, and Careless Responding in Experience Sampling Data in a Student Population (2020), published in Assessment
  • Dimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research (2020), published in Psychological Medicine
  • A meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in Alzheimer's disease highlights novel differentially methylated loci across cortex (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • Selection of the Number of Participants in Intensive Longitudinal Studies: A User-Friendly Shiny App and Tutorial for Performing Power Analysis in Multilevel Regression Models That Account for Temporal Dependencies (2021), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Behaviour change techniques associated with smoking cessation in intervention and comparator groups of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression (2020), published in Addiction

The scientist often collaborates with multiple co-authors in their field. Frequent co-authors include Inez Myin-Germeys, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, Ginette Lafit, Daniel Kotz, and Thomas Vaessen.

Best Publications

  • Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Brent W. Roberts;Kate E. Walton;Wolfgang Viechtbauer

  • Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Patient-Control, Prospective- and Cross-sectional Cohort Studies

    Filippo Varese;Filippo Varese;Feikje Smeets;Marjan Drukker;Ritsaert Lieverse

  • Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis

    Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Mike W.-L. Cheung

  • The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    Anne Kathrin J. Fett;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Maria de Gracia Dominguez;David L. Penn

  • Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model:

    Wolfgang Viechtbauer

  • A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses

    Dean Langan;Dean Langan;Julian P T Higgins;Dan Jackson;Jack Bowden

  • Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression.

    Ingrid A. van de Leemput;Marieke Wichers;Angélique O. J. Cramer;Denny Borsboom

  • Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments.

    Inez Myin-Germeys;Zuzana Kasanova;Thomas Vaessen;Hugo Vachon

  • A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies

    Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Luc Smits;Daniel Kotz;Luc Budé

  • Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass

    César Terrer;César Terrer;César Terrer;Robert B. Jackson;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice;Trevor F. Keenan;Trevor F. Keenan

  • The effects of green tea on weight loss and weight maintenance: a meta-analysis

    R Hursel;W Viechtbauer;M S Westerterp-Plantenga

  • Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments

    Wolfgang Viechtbauer

  • Are psychotic psychopathology and neurocognition orthogonal? A systematic review of their associations.

    Maria de Gracia Dominguez;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Claudia J. P. Simons;Jim van Os

  • A therapeutic application of the experience sampling method in the treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial

    Ingrid Kramer;Claudia J. P. Simons;Jessica A. Hartmann;Claudia Menne-Lothmann

  • Stress Sensitivity, Aberrant Salience, and Threat Anticipation in Early Psychosis: An Experience Sampling Study

    Ulrich Reininghaus;Ulrich Reininghaus;Matthew J. Kempton;Lucia Valmaggia;Tom K. J. Craig

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Longitudinal associations between depression and diabetes complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    A. Nouwen;M.C. Adriaanse;K. van Dam;M.M. Iversen

  • Strength training alone, exercise therapy alone, and exercise therapy with passive manual mobilisation each reduce pain and disability in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

    Mariette J. Jansen;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Antoine F. Lenssen;Erik J.M. Hendriks

  • The link between school climate and violence in school: A meta-analytic review

    Georges Steffgen;Sophie Recchia;Wolfgang Viechtbauer

  • How to Boost Positive Interpretations? A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation

    Claudia Menne-Lothmann;Wolfgang Viechtbauer;Petra Höhn;Zuzana Kasanova

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Marieke Wichers
Marieke Wichers Maastricht University
Aziz Sheikh
Aziz Sheikh University of Oxford
Koen Schruers
Koen Schruers Maastricht University
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Rik Crutzen
Rik Crutzen Maastricht University
Ulrich Reininghaus
Ulrich Reininghaus Heidelberg University
Catherine Derom
Catherine Derom Ghent University
Frenk Peeters
Frenk Peeters Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers a variety of flexible pathways for online study and rewarding careers. Many students consider advanced online programs to specialize in areas like psychology, counseling, or education, opening doors to impactful roles in mental health, research, and academia.

For those interested in clinical psychology, the best psyd programs online offer the credentials needed for licensure and advanced practice. Individuals seeking a fast-tracked counseling career might opt for accelerated mft programs to become licensed marriage and family therapists more quickly.

An online master degree in psychology equips graduates for broad career prospects in research, human resources, counseling, or education. Meanwhile, experienced educators or leaders can consider the fastest edd program online to advance their expertise and leadership opportunities within the educational field.

Whatever your focus, these online options offer flexibility for working professionals, affordable tuition, and accredited curricula designed to help you meet your career goals in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Viechtbauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles