World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
35
Citations
6961
World Ranking
2729
National Ranking
166

Stephan Dempe publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Dempe sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 159 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Stephan Dempe D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Dempe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan Dempe is affiliated with TU Bergakademie Freiberg in Germany, focusing primarily on research in Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics. Their work extensively covers the fields of Optimization and Variational Analysis, Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics, and Fixed Point Theorems Analysis, among others.

Their research spans several subfields, including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Ocean Engineering, Geometry and Topology, Control and Systems Engineering, and Transportation. These areas reflect a diverse interest in both theoretical and applied optimization problems.

Dempe's published work includes contributions to multiple journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Optimization
  • Operations Research Forum
  • SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • RAIRO. Operations research
  • Positivity

Recent publications by Dempe include:

  • Optimality conditions in terms of convexificators for a bilevel multiobjective optimization problem, 2020, Optimization
  • On interval-valued bilevel optimization problems using upper convexificators, 2023, RAIRO. Operations research

Other selected papers from their research network and coauthors involve topics related to network flow, evacuation planning, and stochastic programming:

  • Network Flow with Intermediate Storage: Models and Algorithms, 2020, Operations Research Forum
  • Dynamic network flow location models and algorithms for quickest evacuation planning, 2020, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
  • Risk-Averse Models in Bilevel Stochastic Linear Programming, 2020, SIAM Journal on Optimization

Dempe has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Nazih Abderrazzak Gadhi, Urmila Pyakurel, Tanka Nath Dhamala, Durga Prasad Khanal, and Hari Nandan Nath.

Their published book is titled Bilevel optimization: advances and next challenges, released in 2020 by Springer Nature.

Main research topics addressed in Dempe's work are:

  • Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Fixed Point Theorems Analysis
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Facility Location and Emergency Management
  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming

Best Publications

  • Foundations of Bilevel Programming

    Stephan Dempe

  • Annotated Bibliography on Bilevel Programming and Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints

    Stephan Dempe

  • Bilevel Programming Problems

    Stephan Dempe;Vyacheslav Kalashnikov;Gerardo A. Pérez-Valdés;Nataliya Kalashnykova

  • Is bilevel programming a special case of a mathematical program with complementarity constraints

    S. Dempe;J. Dutta

  • New necessary optimality conditions in optimistic bilevel programming

    S. Dempe;J. Dutta;B. S. Mordukhovich

  • Directional derivatives of the solution of a parametric nonlinear program

    D. Ralph;S. Dempe

  • The bilevel programming problem: reformulations, constraint qualifications and optimality conditions

    Stephan Dempe;Alain B. Zemkoho

  • A necessary and a sufficient optimality condition for bilevel programming problems

    S. Dempe

  • Necessary optimality conditions in pessimistic bilevel programming

    Stephan Dempe;Boris S. Mordukhovich;Alain B. Zemkoho

  • Bilevel Programming and Applications

    Vyacheslav V. Kalashnikov;Vyacheslav V. Kalashnikov;Vyacheslav V. Kalashnikov;Stephan Dempe;Gerardo A. Pérez-Valdés;Nataliya I. Kalashnykova

  • On the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker reformulation of the bilevel optimization problem

    Stephan Dempe;Alain B. Zemkoho

  • A simple algorithm for the-linear bilevel programming problem

    S. Dempe

  • Discrete bilevel programming: Application to a natural gas cash-out problem

    Stephan Dempe;Vyacheslav Kalashnikov;Roger Z. Rı́os-Mercado

  • Optimality conditions for bilevel programming problems

    Stephan Dempe;Vyatcheslav V. Kalashnikov;Nataliya Kalashnykova

  • Bilevel Programming Problems: Theory, Algorithms and Applications to Energy Networks

    Stephan Dempe;Vyacheslav Kalashnikov;Gerardo A. Prez-Valds;Nataliya Kalashnykova

  • The Generalized Mangasarian-Fromowitz Constraint Qualification and Optimality Conditions for Bilevel Programs

    Stephan Dempe;Alain B. Zemkoho

  • New Optimality Conditions for the Semivectorial Bilevel Optimization Problem

    Stephan Dempe;Nazih Abderrazzak Gadhi;Alain B. Zemkoho

  • Linear bilevel programming with upper level constraints depending on the lower level solution

    Ayalew Getachew Mersha;Stephan Dempe

  • Bilevel Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, Applications and a Bibliography

    Stephan Dempe

  • Sensitivity Analysis for Two-Level Value Functions with Applications to Bilevel Programming

    Stephan Dempe;Boris S. Mordukhovich;Alain B. Zemkoho

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris S. Mordukhovich
Boris S. Mordukhovich Wayne State University
Angus R. Simpson
Angus R. Simpson University of Adelaide
Jonathan F. Bard
Jonathan F. Bard The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their academic horizons beyond Mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can be a strategic choice. Programs such as the easiest mba specialization offer flexible paths for those looking to combine analytical skills with business acumen, often requiring less stringent entry criteria.

If convenience is a priority, exploring the easiest mba program options provides accessible education without compromising quality. These programs support career advancement in diverse industries, from finance to technology.

For professionals aiming at leadership roles, especially within academia or consultancy, affordable options are available. Choosing among the dba programs online can be a cost-effective way to earn a Doctorate in Business Administration while balancing other commitments.

Likewise, those fascinated by the intersection of math and economics might consider a cheap masters in finance, which often emphasize quantitative methods and financial modeling—skills highly valued in today’s job market.

Each of these online degree pathways offers unique advantages for math enthusiasts aiming to broaden their career prospects with credible, flexible, and affordable education options.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan Dempe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles