World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11087 10417 1047 1000 514 47290

Neil Greenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil Greenberg between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil Greenberg published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2020. 33 of the 653 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2020. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 47 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 4 publications
1976 2026

653 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil Greenberg: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 3
1978 2
1979 2
1980 0
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 2
1989 0
1990 4
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 6
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 6
2002 25
2003 16
2004 12
2005 16
2006 8
2007 21
2008 21
2009 20
2010 20
2011 25
2012 22
2013 20
2014 24
2015 19
2016 15
2017 19
2018 20
2019 39
2020 47
2021 45
2022 36
2023 45
2024 30
2025 29
2026 4
Total 653
Download as CSV

Neil Greenberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Greenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 514 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 514
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil Greenberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Greenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil Greenberg is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychological and health-related fields, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology and health professions. The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to mental health, particularly in contexts involving trauma, stress, and emergency healthcare settings.

The main fields of study for Neil Greenberg include:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Within these areas, their subfields of study comprise:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Social Psychology

Neil Greenberg's research topics consistently address complex mental health challenges. These topics include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Employment and Welfare Studies

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Neil Greenberg illustrate their focus on mental health issues within high-stress and healthcare environments. Some notable publications are:

  • Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic (2020), BMJ
  • Mental health of staff working in intensive care during Covid-19 (2020), Occupational Medicine
  • Mental health of health-care workers in the COVID-19 era (2020), Nature Reviews Nephrology

Other related papers, though authored by frequent co-authors, also reflect the broader research themes of the group, including:

  • The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence (2020), The Lancet
  • COVID-19 and experiences of moral injury in front-line key workers (2020), Occupational Medicine

Neil Greenberg collaborates frequently with a network of researchers. The most common co-authors include:

  • Sharon A. M. Stevelink
  • Simon Wessely
  • Samantha K. Brooks
  • Victoria Williamson
  • Danielle Lamb

The scientist's work appears regularly in several publication venues, indicating areas of thematic focus and disciplinary contribution. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • BMJ Military Health
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.

    Samantha K Brooks;Rebecca K Webster;Louise E Smith;Lisa Woodland

  • Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic.

    Neil Greenberg;Mary Docherty;Sam Gnanapragasam;Simon Wessely

  • The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence

    Samantha K. Brooks;Rebecca K. Webster;Louise E. Smith;Lisa Woodland

  • What are the consequences of deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan on the mental health of the UK armed forces? A cohort study

    Nicola T Fear;Margaret Jones;Dominic Murphy;Lisa Hull

  • The health of UK military personnel who deployed to the 2003 Iraq war: a cohort study

    Matthew Hotopf;Lisa Hull;Nicola T Fear;Tess Browne

  • A Systematic, Thematic Review of Social and Occupational Factors Associated With Psychological Outcomes in Healthcare Employees During an Infectious Disease Outbreak.

    Samantha Kelly Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Richard Amlôt;Gideon James Rubin

  • Stigma as a Barrier to Seeking Health Care Among Military Personnel With Mental Health Problems

    Marie-Louise Sharp;Nicola T. Fear;Roberto J. Rona;Simon Wessely

  • Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder among UK Armed Forces personnel.

    A. C. Iversen;N. T. Fear;A. Ehlers;J. Hacker Hughes

  • Color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity is a preload insensitive index of left ventricular relaxation: animal and human validation.

    Mario J. Garcia;Nicholas G. Smedira;Neil L. Greenberg;Michael Main

  • A systematic review of the comorbidity between PTSD and alcohol misuse

    Frances Debell;Nicola T. Fear;Marc Head;Samantha Batt-Rawden

  • Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners

    G James Rubin;Chris R Brewin;Neil Greenberg;John Simpson

  • Stress and Reproduction: Reciprocal Relationships

    Neil Greenberg;John C. Wingfield

  • COVID-19 and experiences of moral injury in front-line key workers.

    Victoria Williamson;Dominic Murphy;Neil Greenberg

  • Patterns of drinking in the UK Armed Forces.

    Nicola T. Fear;Amy Iversen;Howard Meltzer;Lorna Workman

  • Occupational moral injury and mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Victoria Williamson;Sharon A. M. Stevelink;Neil Greenberg

  • The prevalence of common mental disorders and PTSD in the UK military: using data from a clinical interview-based study

    Amy C Iversen;Lauren van Staden;Jamie Hacker Hughes;Tess Browne

  • Mental health of staff working in intensive care during COVID-19.

    N. Greenberg;Dale Weston;C. Hall;T. Caulfield

  • Violent offending by UK military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: a data linkage cohort study

    Deirdre Macmanus;Kimberlie Dean;Kimberlie Dean;Margaret Jones;Roberto J. Rona

  • The stigma of mental health problems and other barriers to care in the UK Armed Forces

    Amy C Iversen;Lauren van Staden;Jamie Hacker Hughes;Neil Greenberg

  • Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences and Services to Assist Recovery

    Neil Greenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Wessely
Simon Wessely King's College London
Nicola T. Fear
Nicola T. Fear King's College London
Norman Jones
Norman Jones University of Liverpool
James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Samantha K. Brooks
Samantha K. Brooks King's College London
Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
G. James Rubin
G. James Rubin King's College London
Zoran B. Popović
Zoran B. Popović Cleveland Clinic
Richard Amlôt
Richard Amlôt Public Health England
Nick Grey
Nick Grey Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are a variety of online programs that can broaden your career options in healthcare. Whether you want to focus on specialty nursing, management, or advanced practice, online degrees offer flexibility and accessibility.

For registered nurses, the msn to pmhnp online pathways are ideal for those looking to specialize in psychiatric mental health. These programs prepare you for advanced roles addressing mental health needs, a field growing in demand.

If you're interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider earning an online health management degree. These programs can help you develop vital leadership and organizational skills for managing clinics, hospitals, or health systems.

Cost is often a concern, but there are resources to help you find the cheapest mha programs online. Affordable options mean you can advance your career without overwhelming debt.

For nurses seeking the highest level of clinical practice, the best online bsn to dnp programs provide a direct route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, opening doors to leadership, policy, and advanced patient care roles.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Greenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles