World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daan J.A. Crommelin

Daan J.A. Crommelin

Award Badge
Chemistry
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 91 2008 1800 47 39 306 24636

Daan J.A. Crommelin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daan J.A. Crommelin between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daan J.A. Crommelin published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2004. 7 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2004. 1980: 4 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 6 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daan J.A. Crommelin: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 4
1981 3
1982 1
1983 6
1984 8
1985 6
1986 5
1987 4
1988 10
1989 12
1990 6
1991 15
1992 14
1993 9
1994 12
1995 14
1996 14
1997 16
1998 13
1999 15
2000 11
2001 8
2002 6
2003 14
2004 18
2005 18
2006 15
2007 11
2008 13
2009 6
2010 13
2011 11
2012 7
2013 3
2014 3
2015 8
2016 5
2017 3
2018 6
2019 8
2020 4
2021 9
2022 2
2023 1
2024 6
2025 1
Total 397
Download as CSV

Daan J.A. Crommelin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan J.A. Crommelin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 306 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764 306
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Daan J.A. Crommelin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan J.A. Crommelin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185 91
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Daan J.A. Crommelin is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broader fields, their subfield expertise includes molecular biology, infectious diseases, immunology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and epidemiology.

Their main topics of research cover a variety of areas, notably protein purification and stability, RNA interference and gene delivery, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, immunotherapy and immune responses, animal virus infections, and hepatitis B virus studies.

Recent published papers associated with their work include:

  • "mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability" (2021) published in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • "Addressing the Cold Reality of mRNA Vaccine Stability" (2020) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • "The Storage and In-Use Stability of mRNA Vaccines and Therapeutics: Not A Cold Case" (2022) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • "Applying lessons learned from nanomedicines to understand rare hypersensitivity reactions to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines" (2022) published in Nature Nanotechnology
  • "Ongoing Challenges to Develop High Concentration Monoclonal Antibody-based Formulations for Subcutaneous Administration: Quo Vadis?" (2021) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with their research include Wim Jiskoot, David B. Volkin, Enrico Mastrobattista, Andrea Hawe, and Karin H. Hoogendoorn.

Their work appears across several publication venues with repeated contributions in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Nature Nanotechnology, Pharmaceutical Research, and Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica.

Best Publications

  • mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability.

    Linde Schoenmaker;Dominik Witzigmann;Jayesh A. Kulkarni;Rein Verbeke

  • Structure-immunogenicity relationships of therapeutic proteins.

    Suzanne Hermeling;Daan J. A. Crommelin;Huub Schellekens;Wim Jiskoot

  • Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins REACTIONS WITH MODEL PEPTIDES

    Bernard Metz;Gideon F.A. Kersten;Peter Hoogerhout;Humphrey F. Brugghe

  • Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: Gaps that may compromise product quality

    John F. Carpenter;Theodore W. Randolph;Wim Jiskoot;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Chemical stability of liposomes: implications for their physical stability

    Mustafa Grit;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Effect of Size and Serum Proteins on Transfection Efficiency of Poly ((2-dimethylamino)ethyl Methacrylate)-Plasmid Nanoparticles

    Jong-Yuh Cherng;Petra van de Wetering;Herre Talsma;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Artificial viruses: a nanotechnological approach to gene delivery

    Enrico Mastrobattista;Marieke A. E. M. van der Aa;Wim E. Hennink;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Liposomes: quo vadis?

    Gert Storm;Daan J.A Crommelin

  • Lymphatic uptake and biodistribution of liposomes after subcutaneous injection. II. Influence of liposomal size, lipid compostion and lipid dose.

    C. Oussoren;J. Zuidema;D.J.A. Crommelin;G. Storm

  • Addressing the Cold Reality of mRNA Vaccine Stability.

    Daan J.A. Crommelin;Thomas J. Anchordoquy;David B. Volkin;Wim Jiskoot

  • 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate based (co)polymers as gene transfer agents

    P van de Wetering;J.-Y Cherng;H Talsma;D.J.A Crommelin

  • Liposomal and lipid formulations of amphotericin B : clinical pharmacokinetics

    Robert Janknegt;Siem de Marie;Irma A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH

    Arjen M Funhoff;Cornelus F van Nostrum;Gerben A Koning;Nancy M E Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek

  • N-Trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles loaded with influenza subunit antigen for intranasal vaccination: Biological properties and immunogenicity in a mouse model

    Maryam Amidi;Stefan G. Romeijn;J. Coos Verhoef;Hans E. Junginger

  • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometric Analysis of Protein Conformation: Effect of Sampling Method and Stress Factors

    Marco van de Weert;Parvez I. Haris;Wim E. Hennink;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Protein instability and immunogenicity: Roadblocks to clinical application of injectable protein delivery systems for sustained release

    Wim Jiskoot;Theodore W. Randolph;David B. Volkin;C. Russell Middaugh

  • Shifting paradigms: biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs

    Daan J.A. Crommelin;Gert Storm;Ruud Verrijk;Leo de Leede

  • Cellular uptake of cationic polymer-DNA complexes via caveolae plays a pivotal role in gene transfection in COS-7 cells.

    M. A. E. M. van der Aa;U. S. Huth;S. Y. Häfele;R. Schubert

  • The effect of a water/organic solvent interface on the structural stability of lysozyme

    Marco van de Weert;Julia Hoechstetter;Wim E Hennink;Daan J.A Crommelin

  • Potential inaccurate quantitation and sizing of protein aggregates by size exclusion chromatography: Essential need to use orthogonal methods to assure the quality of therapeutic protein products

    John F. Carpenter;Theodore W. Randolph;Wim Jiskoot;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Antibody response to aggregated human interferon alpha2b in wild-type and transgenic immune tolerant mice depends on type and level of aggregation.

    Suzanne Hermeling;Huub Schellekens;Coen Maas;Martijn F.B.G. Gebbink

  • Adhesion molecules: a new target for immunoliposome‐mediated drug delivery

    P.G.M. Bloemen;P.A.J. Henricks;L. van Bloois;M.C. van den Tweel

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim E. Hennink
Wim E. Hennink Utrecht University
Wim Jiskoot
Wim Jiskoot Leiden University
Gert Storm
Gert Storm Utrecht University
Gideon F.A. Kersten
Gideon F.A. Kersten Leiden University
Wijnand Eling
Wijnand Eling Radboud University Medical Center
Huub Schellekens
Huub Schellekens Utrecht University
Cornelus F. van Nostrum
Cornelus F. van Nostrum Utrecht University
James N. Herron
James N. Herron University of Utah
Geert-Jan Witkamp
Geert-Jan Witkamp King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Hidde J. Haisma
Hidde J. Haisma University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice. For those interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations, pursuing a master's in forensic psychology online can provide specialized expertise in analyzing evidence and understanding behavioral science.

Various careers in forensics blend chemistry skills with investigative techniques, offering roles in crime labs, toxicology, and law enforcement agencies. These positions often require additional education or certification, highlighting the importance of comprehensive degree programs.

Cost is a key consideration when choosing an educational path. Resources like how much does it cost to get a criminal justice degree provide valuable insights into tuition fees and financial planning, helping students make informed decisions about their studies.

For those starting out, the best online associates in criminal justice offer accessible entry points into the field, combining foundational knowledge of the legal system with practical skills that complement a chemistry background.

Best Scientists Citing Daan J.A. Crommelin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles