World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daan J.A. Crommelin

Daan J.A. Crommelin

Award Badge
Chemistry
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
91
Citations
24636
World Ranking
2008
National Ranking
47

Daan J.A. Crommelin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan J.A. Crommelin sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 306 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Daan J.A. Crommelin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan J.A. Crommelin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Daan J.A. Crommelin is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broader fields, their subfield expertise includes molecular biology, infectious diseases, immunology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and epidemiology.

Their main topics of research cover a variety of areas, notably protein purification and stability, RNA interference and gene delivery, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, immunotherapy and immune responses, animal virus infections, and hepatitis B virus studies.

Recent published papers associated with their work include:

  • "mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability" (2021) published in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • "Addressing the Cold Reality of mRNA Vaccine Stability" (2020) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • "The Storage and In-Use Stability of mRNA Vaccines and Therapeutics: Not A Cold Case" (2022) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • "Applying lessons learned from nanomedicines to understand rare hypersensitivity reactions to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines" (2022) published in Nature Nanotechnology
  • "Ongoing Challenges to Develop High Concentration Monoclonal Antibody-based Formulations for Subcutaneous Administration: Quo Vadis?" (2021) published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with their research include Wim Jiskoot, David B. Volkin, Enrico Mastrobattista, Andrea Hawe, and Karin H. Hoogendoorn.

Their work appears across several publication venues with repeated contributions in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Nature Nanotechnology, Pharmaceutical Research, and Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica.

Best Publications

  • mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability.

    Linde Schoenmaker;Dominik Witzigmann;Jayesh A. Kulkarni;Rein Verbeke

  • Structure-immunogenicity relationships of therapeutic proteins.

    Suzanne Hermeling;Daan J. A. Crommelin;Huub Schellekens;Wim Jiskoot

  • Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins REACTIONS WITH MODEL PEPTIDES

    Bernard Metz;Gideon F.A. Kersten;Peter Hoogerhout;Humphrey F. Brugghe

  • Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: Gaps that may compromise product quality

    John F. Carpenter;Theodore W. Randolph;Wim Jiskoot;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Chemical stability of liposomes: implications for their physical stability

    Mustafa Grit;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Effect of Size and Serum Proteins on Transfection Efficiency of Poly ((2-dimethylamino)ethyl Methacrylate)-Plasmid Nanoparticles

    Jong-Yuh Cherng;Petra van de Wetering;Herre Talsma;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Artificial viruses: a nanotechnological approach to gene delivery

    Enrico Mastrobattista;Marieke A. E. M. van der Aa;Wim E. Hennink;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Liposomes: quo vadis?

    Gert Storm;Daan J.A Crommelin

  • Lymphatic uptake and biodistribution of liposomes after subcutaneous injection. II. Influence of liposomal size, lipid compostion and lipid dose.

    C. Oussoren;J. Zuidema;D.J.A. Crommelin;G. Storm

  • Addressing the Cold Reality of mRNA Vaccine Stability.

    Daan J.A. Crommelin;Thomas J. Anchordoquy;David B. Volkin;Wim Jiskoot

  • 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate based (co)polymers as gene transfer agents

    P van de Wetering;J.-Y Cherng;H Talsma;D.J.A Crommelin

  • Liposomal and lipid formulations of amphotericin B : clinical pharmacokinetics

    Robert Janknegt;Siem de Marie;Irma A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg;Daan J. A. Crommelin

  • Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH

    Arjen M Funhoff;Cornelus F van Nostrum;Gerben A Koning;Nancy M E Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek

  • The role of liposomes in clinical nanomedicine development. What now? Now what?

    Daan J.A. Crommelin;Peter van Hoogevest;Gert Storm

  • N-Trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles loaded with influenza subunit antigen for intranasal vaccination: Biological properties and immunogenicity in a mouse model

    Maryam Amidi;Stefan G. Romeijn;J. Coos Verhoef;Hans E. Junginger

  • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometric Analysis of Protein Conformation: Effect of Sampling Method and Stress Factors

    Marco van de Weert;Parvez I. Haris;Wim E. Hennink;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Protein instability and immunogenicity: Roadblocks to clinical application of injectable protein delivery systems for sustained release

    Wim Jiskoot;Theodore W. Randolph;David B. Volkin;C. Russell Middaugh

  • Shifting paradigms: biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs

    Daan J.A. Crommelin;Gert Storm;Ruud Verrijk;Leo de Leede

  • Cellular uptake of cationic polymer-DNA complexes via caveolae plays a pivotal role in gene transfection in COS-7 cells.

    M. A. E. M. van der Aa;U. S. Huth;S. Y. Häfele;R. Schubert

  • The effect of a water/organic solvent interface on the structural stability of lysozyme

    Marco van de Weert;Julia Hoechstetter;Wim E Hennink;Daan J.A Crommelin

  • Potential inaccurate quantitation and sizing of protein aggregates by size exclusion chromatography: Essential need to use orthogonal methods to assure the quality of therapeutic protein products

    John F. Carpenter;Theodore W. Randolph;Wim Jiskoot;Daan J.A. Crommelin

  • Antibody response to aggregated human interferon alpha2b in wild-type and transgenic immune tolerant mice depends on type and level of aggregation.

    Suzanne Hermeling;Huub Schellekens;Coen Maas;Martijn F.B.G. Gebbink

  • Adhesion molecules: a new target for immunoliposome‐mediated drug delivery

    P.G.M. Bloemen;P.A.J. Henricks;L. van Bloois;M.C. van den Tweel

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim E. Hennink
Wim E. Hennink Utrecht University
Wim Jiskoot
Wim Jiskoot Leiden University
Gert Storm
Gert Storm Utrecht University
Gideon F.A. Kersten
Gideon F.A. Kersten Leiden University
Wijnand Eling
Wijnand Eling Radboud University Medical Center
Huub Schellekens
Huub Schellekens Utrecht University
Cornelus F. van Nostrum
Cornelus F. van Nostrum Utrecht University
James N. Herron
James N. Herron University of Utah
Geert-Jan Witkamp
Geert-Jan Witkamp King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Hidde J. Haisma
Hidde J. Haisma University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice. For those interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations, pursuing a master's in forensic psychology online can provide specialized expertise in analyzing evidence and understanding behavioral science.

Various careers in forensics blend chemistry skills with investigative techniques, offering roles in crime labs, toxicology, and law enforcement agencies. These positions often require additional education or certification, highlighting the importance of comprehensive degree programs.

Cost is a key consideration when choosing an educational path. Resources like how much does it cost to get a criminal justice degree provide valuable insights into tuition fees and financial planning, helping students make informed decisions about their studies.

For those starting out, the best online associates in criminal justice offer accessible entry points into the field, combining foundational knowledge of the legal system with practical skills that complement a chemistry background.

Best Scientists Citing Daan J.A. Crommelin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles