World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 36 2021 1898 61 59 80 13254

Paul Boselie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Boselie between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Boselie published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2013. 8 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2013. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
2000 2025

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Boselie: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 6
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 6
2011 2
2012 1
2013 10
2014 4
2015 4
2016 3
2017 4
2018 6
2019 3
2020 1
2021 6
2022 0
2023 3
2024 5
2025 3
Total 89
Download as CSV

Paul Boselie publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Boselie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 80–84 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 80 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116 80
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Boselie D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Boselie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114 36
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Boselie is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research work primarily spans across the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences.

The focal areas of Boselie's research cover several subfields, notably:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Administration
  • Health Informatics

Their publications address a range of topics including:

  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • AI and HR Technologies
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Paul Boselie has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • "Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT" (2023), published in Human Resource Management Journal
  • "'Lean Dancing': How Involvement in Continuous Improvement and Lean Techniques Relate to Hospital Performance and Workers' Wellbeing through Autonomy" (2023), published in Sustainability
  • "Corporate Scandals as Punctuating Events That Change Human Resource Roles" (2024), published in Journal of Management

The researcher has frequently published in these venues:

  • Human Resource Management Journal
  • Sustainability
  • Journal of Management

Paul Boselie has collaborated with several co-authors including:

  • Jaap Paauwe
  • Eva Knies
  • Pawan Budhwar
  • Soumyadeb Chowdhury
  • Geoffrey Wood

Best Publications

  • Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research

    Paul Boselie;Graham Dietz;Corine Boon

  • HRM and performance: What's next?

    Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

  • Performance management: A model and research agenda

    Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person-organisation and person-job fit

    Corine Boon;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • Challenging ‘strategic HRM’ and the relevance of the institutional setting

    Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

  • Human resource management and performance: Lessons from the Netherlands

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Jansen

  • A review of talent management: ‘infancy or adolescence?’

    Marian Thunnissen;Paul Boselie;Ben Fruytier

  • Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach

    Marian Thunnissen;Paul Boselie;Ben Fruytier

  • Strategic Human Resource Management: A Balanced Approach

    Paul Boselie

  • Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management

    Corine Boon;Rory Eckardt;David P. Lepak;Paul Boselie

  • Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago

    Michael Beer;Paul Boselie;Chris Brewster

  • Employee perceptions of HRM and TQM, and the effects on satisfaction and intention to leave

    Paul Boselie;Ton van der Wiele

  • Empirical evidence for the relationship between customer satisfaction and business performance

    Ton van der Wiele;Paul Boselie;Martijn Hesselink

  • High performance work practices in the health care sector: a Dutch case study

    Paul Boselie

  • Human resource function competencies in European companies

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • Human resource management, institutionalization and organizational performance: a comparison of hospitals, hotels and local government

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe;Ray Richardson

  • Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit

    Corine Boon;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie;Deanne Den Hartog

  • In search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: an overview of the issues

    Paul Boselie;Chris Brewster;Jaap Paauwe

  • The Lack of Impact of Dissensus Inspired Analysis on Developments in the Field of Human Resource Management

    Anne Keegan;Anne Keegan;Anne Keegan;Paul Boselie;Paul Boselie

  • HRM and strategic climates in hospitals: does the message come across at the ward level?

    Monique Veld;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap Paauwe
Jaap Paauwe Tilburg University
Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam
Chris Brewster
Chris Brewster University of Reading
Ton van der Wiele
Ton van der Wiele Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mike Wright
Mike Wright Imperial College London
Elaine Farndale
Elaine Farndale Pennsylvania State University
Nicolas Bacon
Nicolas Bacon City, University of London
Anne Keegan
Anne Keegan University College Dublin
Mirko Noordegraaf
Mirko Noordegraaf Utrecht University
Paul Jansen
Paul Jansen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is an excellent way to access quality education in Business and Management while managing costs and flexibility. If affordability is your top concern, consider reviewing the cheapest masters degrees for programs that deliver value without compromising on accreditation or recognition.

Specialized fields such as data analytics continue to gain traction. Pursuing an online data science degree can open doors to roles in business intelligence and predictive modeling, which are in high demand.

For those aiming at senior leadership or academic positions, an advanced credential like a doctorate organizational leadership online can be a strategic investment to enhance your career trajectory and develop transformational leadership skills.

Before enrolling, always ensure your chosen program comes from accredited online universities. Accreditation ensures the quality and recognition of your qualification, which is vital for future employment or further studies.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Boselie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles