World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
36
Citations
13254
World Ranking
2021
National Ranking
61

Paul Boselie publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Boselie sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 80 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Paul Boselie D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Boselie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Boselie is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research work primarily spans across the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences.

The focal areas of Boselie's research cover several subfields, notably:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Administration
  • Health Informatics

Their publications address a range of topics including:

  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • AI and HR Technologies
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Paul Boselie has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • "Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT" (2023), published in Human Resource Management Journal
  • "'Lean Dancing': How Involvement in Continuous Improvement and Lean Techniques Relate to Hospital Performance and Workers' Wellbeing through Autonomy" (2023), published in Sustainability
  • "Corporate Scandals as Punctuating Events That Change Human Resource Roles" (2024), published in Journal of Management

The researcher has frequently published in these venues:

  • Human Resource Management Journal
  • Sustainability
  • Journal of Management

Paul Boselie has collaborated with several co-authors including:

  • Jaap Paauwe
  • Eva Knies
  • Pawan Budhwar
  • Soumyadeb Chowdhury
  • Geoffrey Wood

Best Publications

  • Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research

    Paul Boselie;Graham Dietz;Corine Boon

  • HRM and performance: What's next?

    Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

  • Performance management: A model and research agenda

    Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person-organisation and person-job fit

    Corine Boon;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • Challenging ‘strategic HRM’ and the relevance of the institutional setting

    Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

  • Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT

    Unknown

  • Human resource management and performance: Lessons from the Netherlands

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Jansen

  • A review of talent management: ‘infancy or adolescence?’

    Marian Thunnissen;Paul Boselie;Ben Fruytier

  • Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach

    Marian Thunnissen;Paul Boselie;Ben Fruytier

  • Strategic Human Resource Management: A Balanced Approach

    Paul Boselie

  • Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management

    Corine Boon;Rory Eckardt;David P. Lepak;Paul Boselie

  • Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago

    Michael Beer;Paul Boselie;Chris Brewster

  • Employee perceptions of HRM and TQM, and the effects on satisfaction and intention to leave

    Paul Boselie;Ton van der Wiele

  • Empirical evidence for the relationship between customer satisfaction and business performance

    Ton van der Wiele;Paul Boselie;Martijn Hesselink

  • High performance work practices in the health care sector: a Dutch case study

    Paul Boselie

  • Human resource function competencies in European companies

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe

  • Human resource management, institutionalization and organizational performance: a comparison of hospitals, hotels and local government

    Paul Boselie;Jaap Paauwe;Ray Richardson

  • Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit

    Corine Boon;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie;Deanne Den Hartog

  • In search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: an overview of the issues

    Paul Boselie;Chris Brewster;Jaap Paauwe

  • The Lack of Impact of Dissensus Inspired Analysis on Developments in the Field of Human Resource Management

    Anne Keegan;Anne Keegan;Anne Keegan;Paul Boselie;Paul Boselie

  • HRM and strategic climates in hospitals: does the message come across at the ward level?

    Monique Veld;Jaap Paauwe;Paul Boselie

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap Paauwe
Jaap Paauwe Tilburg University
Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam
Chris Brewster
Chris Brewster University of Reading
Ton van der Wiele
Ton van der Wiele Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mike Wright
Mike Wright Imperial College London
Elaine Farndale
Elaine Farndale Pennsylvania State University
Nicolas Bacon
Nicolas Bacon City, University of London
Anne Keegan
Anne Keegan University College Dublin
Mirko Noordegraaf
Mirko Noordegraaf Utrecht University
Paul Jansen
Paul Jansen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is an excellent way to access quality education in Business and Management while managing costs and flexibility. If affordability is your top concern, consider reviewing the cheapest masters degrees for programs that deliver value without compromising on accreditation or recognition.

Specialized fields such as data analytics continue to gain traction. Pursuing an online data science degree can open doors to roles in business intelligence and predictive modeling, which are in high demand.

For those aiming at senior leadership or academic positions, an advanced credential like a doctorate organizational leadership online can be a strategic investment to enhance your career trajectory and develop transformational leadership skills.

Before enrolling, always ensure your chosen program comes from accredited online universities. Accreditation ensures the quality and recognition of your qualification, which is vital for future employment or further studies.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Boselie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles