World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Douglas S. Scherr

Douglas S. Scherr

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
17945
World Ranking
17751
National Ranking
8859

Douglas S. Scherr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Scherr sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 535 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Douglas S. Scherr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Scherr sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas S. Scherr is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans various subfields including surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and oncology.

Their research topics cover a range of issues primarily related to cardiac health and oncology. Specific areas of study include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Douglas S. Scherr has published frequently in several academic venues, with a notable number of publications appearing in the following journals:

  • EP Europace
  • The Journal of Urology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations

Their recent papers include the following notable works:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2020, European Heart Journal
  • 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death, 2022, European Heart Journal
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2024, European Heart Journal
  • European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021, 2021, European Heart Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research include Martin Manninger, Andreas Zirlik, Ursula Rohrer, Jonathan E. Shoag, and Ewald Kolesnik. These co-authors have worked alongside Douglas S. Scherr across multiple publications, reflecting an active engagement in collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125 + germline progenitors

    Marco Seandel;Marco Seandel;Daylon James;Sergey V. Shmelkov;Ilaria Falciatori

  • A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy.

    Casey K. Ng;Eric C. Kauffman;Ming-Ming Lee;Brandon J. Otto

  • Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and the Upper Tract: Disparate Twins

    David A. Green;Michael Rink;Evanguelos Xylinas;Surena F. Matin

  • Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.

    Gerald J. Wang;Daniel A. Barocas;Jay D. Raman;Douglas S. Scherr

  • Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

    Jamie Messer;Shahrokh F. Shariat;James C. Brien;Michael P. Herman

  • Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

    Kamran Ahmed;Shahid A. Khan;Matthew H. Hayn;Piyush K. Agarwal

  • Combining urinary detection of TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 with serum PSA to predict diagnosis of prostate cancer

    Simpa S. Salami;Folke Schmidt;Bharathi Laxman;Meredith M. Regan

  • Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Evanguelos Xylinas;Evanguelos Xylinas;Michael Rink;Michael Rink;Eugene K. Cha;Thomas Clozel

  • Preoperative Hydronephrosis, Ureteroscopic Biopsy Grade and Urinary Cytology Can Improve Prediction of Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    James C. Brien;Shahrokh If. Shariat;Michael P. Herman;Casey K. Ng

  • Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

    E. Xylinas;M. Kent;L. Kluth;L. Kluth;A. Pycha

  • Increased Expression of the Polycomb Group Gene, EZH2, in Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder

    Jay D. Raman;Nigel P. Mongan;Satish K. Tickoo;Stephen A. Boorjian

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer.

    Douglas Scherr;Peter W Swindle;Peter T Scardino

  • Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

    Raza S. Johar;Matthew H. Hayn;Andrew P. Stegemann;Kamran Ahmed

  • Role of androgen receptor and associated lysine-demethylase coregulators, LSD1 and JMJD2A, in localized and advanced human bladder cancer

    Eric C. Kauffman;Brian D. Robinson;Martin J. Downes;Martin J. Downes;Leagh G. Powell

  • High expression of the Met receptor in prostate cancer metastasis to bone

    Beatrice S Knudsen;Glenn A Gmyrek;Jennifer Inra;Douglas S Scherr

  • Predicting Clinical Outcomes After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    Eugene K. Cha;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Matthias Kormaksson;Giacomo Novara

  • Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

    Ahmed A Hussein;Paul R May;Zhe Jing;Youssef E Ahmed

  • The Impact of Tumor Multifocality on Outcomes in Patients Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy

    Thomas F. Chromecki;Thomas F. Chromecki;Eugene K. Cha;Harun Fajkovic;Vitaly Margulis

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: prognostic factors for survival of patients treated with M-VAC with 5-year follow-up.

    P. K. Schultz;H. W. Herr;Zuo-Feng Zhang;D. F. Bajorin

  • Androgen receptor expression is inversely correlated with pathologic tumor stage in bladder cancer

    Stephen Boorjian;Stacy Ugras;Nigel P Mongan;Lorraine J Gudas

Frequent Co-Authors

Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Jay D. Raman
Jay D. Raman Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Giacomo Novara
Giacomo Novara University of Padua
Felix K.-H. Chun
Felix K.-H. Chun Universität Hamburg
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Morgan Rouprêt
Morgan Rouprêt Université Paris Cité
Wassim Kassouf
Wassim Kassouf McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine offers many rewarding career paths beyond becoming a physician. An increasing number of students are exploring flexible and convenient online degree options to advance their education and credentials within healthcare.

One popular route is hospital administration, with cahme-accredited online mha programs opening doors to leadership roles. For nurses, programs like rn to bsn programs no clinicals provide ways to upgrade qualifications without additional on-site requirements.

Those seeking advanced practice or leadership in nursing can consider the fastest msn to dnp program options, as well as the shortest dnp program pathways for quicker completion.

Whether you’re aiming for clinical, administrative, or specialized nursing roles, online programs make it possible to balance career growth with life’s other commitments. Explore these flexible pathways to reach your healthcare goals.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas S. Scherr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles