World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
30195
World Ranking
2489
National Ranking
188

Angela T. Moles publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela T. Moles sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 151 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Angela T. Moles D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela T. Moles sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angela T. Moles is a researcher affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their work primarily spans Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecological Modeling, and Genetics.

The main topics covered in their research include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Biological Control of Invasive Species, and Plant Reproductive Biology.

Their recent publications indicate a range of ecological and biological themes. Selected papers include:

  • The sex with the reduced sex chromosome dies earlier: a comparison across the tree of life (2020), Biology Letters
  • Three Frontiers for the Future of Biodiversity Research Using Citizen Science Data (2020), BioScience
  • Terrestrial ecosystem restoration increases biodiversity and reduces its variability, but not to reference levels: A global meta-analysis (2022), Ecology Letters
  • Tropical plants do not have narrower temperature tolerances, but are more at risk from warming because they are close to their upper thermal limits (2020), Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset (2022), Scientific Data

Frequent collaborators in their research include Stephen P. Bonser, Eve Slavich, Zoe A. Xirocostas, Susan E. Everingham, and Rhiannon L. Dalrymple.

Angela T. Moles has published multiple studies in key academic venues such as Ecology and Evolution, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Global Ecology and Biogeography, Journal of Biogeography, and Journal of Ecology. These venues reflect the broad scope of their ecological and environmental research.

Best Publications

  • Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species

    Mark Westoby;Daniel S. Falster;Angela T. Moles;Peter A. Vesk

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function

    Sandra Myrna Díaz;Jens Kattge;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Ian J. Wright

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits

    J. Kattge;S. Díaz;S. Lavorel;I. C. Prentice

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments

    Amy E. Zanne;David C. Tank;William K. Cornwell;Jonathan M. Eastman

  • The Evolutionary ecology of seed size

    Michelle R. Leishman;Ian J. Wright;Angela T. Moles;Mark Westoby

  • Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature

    Angela T. Moles;Mark Westoby

  • Global patterns in plant height

    Angela T. Moles;David I. Warton;Laura Warman;Nathan G. Swenson

  • Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle

    Angela T. Moles;Mark Westoby

  • Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass

    Fiona J. Thomson;Angela T. Moles;Tony D. Auld;Richard T. Kingsford

  • A Brief History of Seed Size

    Angela T. Moles;David D. Ackerly;Campbell O. Webb;John C. Tweddle;John C. Tweddle

  • Global patterns in seed size

    Angela T Moles;Angela T Moles;David D Ackerly;John C Tweddle;John C Tweddle;John B Dickie

  • Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation?

    Angela T. Moles;Sarah E. Perkins;Shawn W. Laffan;Habacuc Flores-Moreno

  • Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivory

    Angela T. Moles;Stephen P. Bonser;Alistair G.B. Poore;Ian R. Wallis

  • Small-seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime

    Angela T. Moles;Daniel S. Falster;Michelle R. Leishman;Mark Westoby

  • What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size

    Angela T. Moles;Mark Westoby

  • Factors that shape seed mass evolution

    Angela T. Moles;David D. Ackerly;Campbell O. Webb;John C. Tweddle

  • The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America

    Nathan G. Swenson;Brian J. Enquist;Brian J. Enquist;Brian J. Enquist;Jason Pither;Andrew J. Kerkhoff

  • Latitude, seed predation and seed mass

    Angela T Moles;Mark Westoby

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset

    Unknown

  • Vegetation of New Zealand

    Angela Moles

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Westoby
Mark Westoby Macquarie University
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Amy E. Zanne
Amy E. Zanne University of Miami
William K. Cornwell
William K. Cornwell University of New South Wales
Michelle R. Leishman
Michelle R. Leishman Macquarie University
Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright Western Sydney University
Nathan G. Swenson
Nathan G. Swenson University of Notre Dame
Lonnie W. Aarssen
Lonnie W. Aarssen Queen's University
Jacek Oleksyn
Jacek Oleksyn Polish Academy of Sciences
Dana L. Royer
Dana L. Royer Wesleyan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads to diverse career opportunities in research, conservation, education, and healthcare. Many students are now considering flexible pathways to multidisciplinary careers, often pairing their interests with online education options.

For example, those interested in healthcare and science may pursue online direct entry msn programs designed for non-nurses. These accelerated online degrees allow students from other backgrounds, such as biology or ecology, to swiftly transition into healthcare roles.

Choosing the right institution is crucial for ensuring academic quality and value. Students can compare programs to find the best value nursing education online wgu or similar universities, especially those offering strong science curricula and pathways for advancement.

Bridge programs are also available, such as rn to bsn to msn online programs, which offer streamlined routes for professionals wanting to expand their credentials.

It’s advisable to focus on schools recognized for both credibility and affordability. Prioritize the non profit university options, as these often deliver the highest standards and best long-term value for online learners.

Best Scientists Citing Angela T. Moles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles