World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alejandrina Cristia

Alejandrina Cristia

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
5993
World Ranking
7646
National Ranking
72

Alejandrina Cristia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandrina Cristia sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alejandrina Cristia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandrina Cristia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research : Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building

    Michael C. Frank;Elika Bergelson;Christina Bergmann;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Child-Directed Speech Is Infrequent in a Forager-Farmer Population: A Time Allocation Study

    Alejandrina Cristia;Emmanuel Dupoux;Michael Gurven;Jonathan Stieglitz

  • The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech.

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Parental Reports on Touch Screen Use in Early Childhood

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan.

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Charlotte Vaughn;Rachel Schmale

  • Promoting Replicability in Developmental Research Through Meta‐analyses: Insights From Language Acquisition Research

    Christina Bergmann;Christina Bergmann;Sho Tsuji;Sho Tsuji;Page E. Piccinini;Molly L. Lewis;Molly L. Lewis

  • Cerebral lateralization and early speech acquisition: A developmental scenario

    Yasuyo Minagawa-Kawai;Yasuyo Minagawa-Kawai;Alejandrina Cristià;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • Input to Language: The Phonetics and Perception of Infant-Directed Speech

    Alejandrina Cristia;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Perceptual attunement in vowels: A meta‐analysis

    Sho Tsuji;Sho Tsuji;Alejandrina Cristia;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Developmental Changes in Infants' Ability to Cope with Dialect Variation in Word Recognition

    Rachel Schmale;Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Elizabeth K. Johnson

  • HomeBank: An Online Repository of Daylong Child-Centered Audio Recordings

    Mark VanDam;Anne S. Warlaumont;Elika Bergelson;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Is Infants' Learning of Sound Patterns Constrained by Phonological Features?

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Mothers Speak Less Clearly to Infants Than to Adults A Comprehensive Test of the Hyperarticulation Hypothesis

    Andrew Martin;Thomas Schatz;Maarten Versteegh;Kouki Miyazawa

  • Toddlers recognize words in an unfamiliar accent after brief exposure

    Rachel Schmale;Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants

    Alejandrina Cristià;Grant L. McGuire;Amanda Seidl;Alexander L. Francis

  • A thorough evaluation of the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system

    Alejandrina Cristia;Marvin Lavechin;Camila Scaff;Melanie Soderstrom

  • Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues.

    Amanda Seidl;Alejandrina Cristià

  • Predicting Individual Variation in Language From Infant Speech Perception Measures

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Caroline Junge;Melanie Soderstrom

  • Accuracy of the Language Environment Analysis System Segmentation and Metrics: A Systematic Review.

    Alejandrina Cristia;Federica Bulgarelli;Elika Bergelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Amanda Seidl
Amanda Seidl Purdue University West Lafayette
Emmanuel Dupoux
Emmanuel Dupoux School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
Jun Du
Jun Du University of Science and Technology of China
Sharon Peperkamp
Sharon Peperkamp École Normale Supérieure
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Mark Liberman
Mark Liberman University of Pennsylvania
Kenneth Church
Kenneth Church Baidu (China)
Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alejandrina Cristia

Recently Published Articles