World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6221 5778 69 51 103 6195

Sharon Peperkamp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sharon Peperkamp between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sharon Peperkamp published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 4 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sharon Peperkamp: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 6
2004 4
2005 0
2006 5
2007 3
2008 6
2009 1
2010 4
2011 7
2012 3
2013 8
2014 5
2015 7
2016 6
2017 9
2018 5
2019 5
2020 4
2021 5
2022 3
2023 3
2024 5
2025 3
2026 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

Sharon Peperkamp publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Peperkamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 103 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 103
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sharon Peperkamp D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Peperkamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Sharon Peperkamp is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure in France. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology and social sciences, with particular engagement in experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, linguistics and language, as well as artificial intelligence.

Their scholarly output centers on topics related to phonetics and phonology research, linguistic variation and morphology, speech and dialogue systems, language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, syntax, semantics, linguistic variation, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

Frequent publication venues for Sharon Peperkamp include:

  • Second language Research
  • Linguistics Vanguard
  • Phonology
  • Journal of Language and Social Psychology
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition

Sharon Peperkamp has collaborated frequently with a core group of co-authors:

  • Alexander Martin
  • Gerda Ana Melnik
  • Hualin Xiao
  • Brent Strickland
  • M. Julia Carbajal

Their recent papers include:

  • Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmony (2020, Phonology)
  • On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones' processing of the French /u/-/y/ contrast (2021, Second language Research)
  • How Fair is Gender-Fair Language? Insights from Gender Ratio Estimations in French (2022, Journal of Language and Social Psychology)
  • High-Variability Phonetic Training enhances second language lexical processing: evidence from online training of French learners of English (2020, Bilingualism Language and Cognition)
  • A meta-analysis of infants' word-form recognition (2021, Infancy)

Best Publications

  • Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish

    Emmanuel Dupoux;Núria Sebastián-Gallés;Eduardo Navarrete;Sharon Peperkamp;Sharon Peperkamp

  • A robust method to study stress "deafness".

    Emmanuel Dupoux;Sharon Peperkamp;Núria Sebastián-Gallés

  • Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception

    Sharon Peperkamp;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • A typological study of stress ‘deafness’

    Sharon Peperkamp;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data

    Anne Christophe;Sharon Peperkamp;Sharon Peperkamp;Christophe Pallier;Eliza Block

  • The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints

    Sharon Peperkamp;Rozenn Le Calvez;Rozenn Le Calvez;Jean-Pierre Nadal;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • A Psycholinguistic Theory of Loanword Adaptations

    Sharon Peperkamp

  • On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese

    Sharon Peperkamp;Inga Vendelin;Kimihiro Nakamura

  • The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations

    Inga Vendelin;Sharon Peperkamp

  • Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation

    Sharon Peperkamp;Inga Vendelin;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: the role of prosody

    Anne Christophe;Ariel Gout;Sharon Peperkamp;Sharon Peperkamp;James Morgan;James Morgan

  • Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals

    Emmanuel Dupoux;Sharon Peperkamp;Sharon Peperkamp;Núria Sebastián-Gallés

  • Where Do Illusory Vowels Come from

    Emmanuel Dupoux;Emmanuel Dupoux;Erika Parlato;Sonia Frota;Yuki Hirose

  • Adaptation to novel accents: feature-based learning of context-sensitive phonological regularities.

    Katrin Skoruppa;Sharon Peperkamp

  • Language-specific stress perception by 9-month-old French and Spanish infants.

    Katrin Skoruppa;Katrin Skoruppa;Ferran Pons;Anne Christophe;Anne Christophe;Laura Bosch

  • Rapid Acquisition of Phonological Alternations by Infants

    Katherine S. White;Sharon Peperkamp;Cecilia Kirk;James L. Morgan

  • Learning Phonemes With a Proto-Lexicon

    Andrew Martin;Andrew Martin;Sharon Peperkamp;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • Consonants are More Important than Vowels in the Bouba-kiki Effect.

    Mathilde Fort;Alexander Martin;Sharon Peperkamp

  • Symbouki: a meta-analysis on the emergence of sound symbolism in early language acquisition.

    Mathilde Fort;Mathilde Fort;Imme Lammertink;Sharon Peperkamp;Sharon Peperkamp;Adriana Guevara-Rukoz

  • Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmony

    Alexander Martin;Sharon Peperkamp

  • Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals’ native language

    Shiri Lev-Ari;Sharon Peperkamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanuel Dupoux
Emmanuel Dupoux School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences
Anne Christophe
Anne Christophe École Normale Supérieure
Alejandrina Cristia
Alejandrina Cristia École Normale Supérieure
Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Núria Sebastián-Gallés Pompeu Fabra University
James L. Morgan
James L. Morgan Brown University
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
René Kager
René Kager Utrecht University
Sid Kouider
Sid Kouider École Normale Supérieure
Franck Ramus
Franck Ramus École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career opportunities in Social Sciences and Humanities is now more flexible than ever thanks to online learning. Many universities offer accelerated social work programs that let you earn your MSW faster and jumpstart your career in helping professions.

If you’re interested in human behavior and mental health, you can complete a 2-year psychology degree online. This is ideal for those seeking flexibility or aiming to quickly transfer credits toward a bachelor’s program.

For students focused on therapy and counseling, accredited options matter. Look for programs that are cacrep accredited, as this ensures recognized standards in clinical counseling education—which can be essential for licensure.

Those specifically interested in supporting families may want to pursue an marriage and family therapy degree online. These programs combine psychological principles with practical skills to prepare you for roles in private practice, hospitals, or community agencies.

Best Scientists Citing Sharon Peperkamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles