World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 34 6934 6440 3368 3071 112 5127

Amanda Seidl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Seidl between 2001 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Seidl published across 23 years, from 2001 to 2023, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 5 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications
2001 2023

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Seidl: publications per year, 2001 to 2023
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 8
2009 5
2010 4
2011 9
2012 7
2013 8
2014 12
2015 9
2016 5
2017 10
2018 6
2019 13
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
Total 121
Download as CSV

Amanda Seidl publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Seidl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 112 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 112
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Seidl D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Seidl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181 34
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Seidl is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with an emphasis on developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Additional interests include artificial intelligence, education, and pharmacy.

Their work centers on topics such as language development and disorders, autism spectrum disorder research, behavioral and psychological studies, speech recognition and synthesis, child development and digital technology, infant health and development, and hearing impairment and communication.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Amanda Seidl include:

  • "Describing Vocalizations in Young Children: A Big Data Approach Through Citizen Science Annotation," 2021, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • "Semi-Automatic Assessment of Vocalization Quality for Children With and Without Angelman Syndrome," 2023, PubMed
  • "Electrophysiological Measures of Tactile and Auditory Processing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder," 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Mothers' Use of Touch Across Infants' Development and Its Implications for Word Learning: Evidence from Korean Dyadic Interactions," 2023, Infancy
  • "Equivalent Behavioral Facilitation to Tactile Cues in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder," 2021, Brain Sciences

Amanda Seidl has frequently collaborated with co-authors such as Lisa R. Hamrick, Bridgette Kelleher, Rana Abu-Zhaya, Girija Kadlaskar, and Sophia Bergmann.

The scientist's work has been published in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (2 publications)
  • PubMed (1 publication)
  • Infancy (1 publication)
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (1 publication)
  • Brain Sciences (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants

    Melanie Soderstrom;Amanda Seidl;Deborah G. Kemler Nelson;Peter W. Jusczyk

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Minimal Indirect Reference: A Theory of the Syntax-Phonology Interface

    Amanda Hallie Seidl

  • Infant word segmentation revisited: edge alignment facilitates target extraction.

    Amanda Seidl;Elizabeth K. Johnson

  • The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech.

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Parental Reports on Touch Screen Use in Early Childhood

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan.

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Charlotte Vaughn;Rachel Schmale

  • Infants’ use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation

    Amanda Seidl

  • Accommodating variability in voice and foreign accent: flexibility of early word representations.

    Rachel Schmale;Amanda Seidl

  • On the Learning of Arbitrary Phonological Rules

    Amanda Seidl;Eugene Buckley

  • Developmental Changes in Infants' Ability to Cope with Dialect Variation in Word Recognition

    Rachel Schmale;Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Elizabeth K. Johnson

  • Early Understanding of Subject and Object Wh-Questions

    Amanda Seidl;George Hollich;Peter W. Jusczyk

  • The edge factor in early word segmentation: utterance-level prosody enables word form extraction by 6-month-olds.

    Elizabeth K. Johnson;Amanda Seidl;Michael D. Tyler

  • At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics

    Elizabeth K. Johnson;Amanda H. Seidl

  • Is Infants' Learning of Sound Patterns Constrained by Phonological Features?

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Toddlers recognize words in an unfamiliar accent after brief exposure

    Rachel Schmale;Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl

  • Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants

    Alejandrina Cristià;Grant L. McGuire;Amanda Seidl;Alexander L. Francis

  • Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues.

    Amanda Seidl;Alejandrina Cristià

  • Predicting Individual Variation in Language From Infant Speech Perception Measures

    Alejandrina Cristia;Amanda Seidl;Caroline Junge;Melanie Soderstrom

  • The INTERSPEECH 2019 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Styrian Dialects, Continuous Sleepiness, Baby Sounds & Orca Activity.

    Björn W. Schuller;Anton Batliner;Christian Bergler;Florian B. Pokorny

  • Allophonic and phonemic contrasts in infants' learning of sound patterns

    Amanda Seidl;Alejandrina Cristia;Amelie Bernard;Kristine H. Onishi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alejandrina Cristia
Alejandrina Cristia École Normale Supérieure
Elizabeth K. Johnson
Elizabeth K. Johnson University of Toronto
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Leher Singh
Leher Singh University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Thierry Nazzi
Thierry Nazzi Université Paris Cité
Janet F. Werker
Janet F. Werker University of British Columbia
Sharon Peperkamp
Sharon Peperkamp École Normale Supérieure
Emmanuel Dupoux
Emmanuel Dupoux School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences
Sandra R. Waxman
Sandra R. Waxman Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the Social Sciences and Humanities, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable options for starting or advancing your career. Many high-demand roles in areas like psychology, counseling, and social work now accept online credentials, provided they are properly accredited.

If you’re considering a future in clinical counseling, a cacrep accredited counseling program ensures you meet industry standards and licensure requirements. Those looking to work with families and couples can explore a marriage and family therapy degree online to specialize in relational and mental health support.

For a broader understanding of human behavior, pursuing an accredited online psychology degree can open doors to multiple career paths including research, business, and education. Alternatively, a career in social advocacy and community support starts with choosing from the msw (Master of Social Work) programs that balance accessibility and professional recognition.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to specialize, these accredited online programs provide the credentials and flexibility needed to make a real impact in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Seidl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles