World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
21211
World Ranking
18780
National Ranking
9358

Louis L. Pisters publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis L. Pisters sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 400 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Louis L. Pisters D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis L. Pisters sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louis L. Pisters is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of medicine, with an emphasis on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, molecular biology, cancer research, and neurology.

Their work covers several key topics within the medical field, including:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Testicular diseases and treatments
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Louis L. Pisters has contributed to numerous publications, particularly in the following journals:

  • Cancers
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
  • Clinical Cancer Research

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • John F. Ward
  • Brian F. Chapin
  • John W. Davis
  • Patricia Troncoso
  • Miao Zhang

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Neoantigen responses, immune correlates, and favorable outcomes after ipilimumab treatment of patients with prostate cancer," 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • "The MD Anderson Prostate Cancer Patient-derived Xenograft Series (MDA PCa PDX) Captures the Molecular Landscape of Prostate Cancer and Facilitates Marker-driven Therapy Development," 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • "Ductal Prostate Cancers Demonstrate Poor Outcomes with Conventional Therapies," 2020, European Urology
  • "Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer," 2021, Nature Reviews Urology
  • "Somatic-type Malignancies in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors," 2021, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Best Publications

  • Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

    Martin G. Sanda;Rodney L. Dunn;Jeff Michalski;Howard M. Sandler

  • p53 Protein Accumulation and Gene Mutation in the Progression of Human Prostate Carcinoma

    Nora M. Navone;Patricia Troncoso;Louis L. Pisters;Tamra L. Goodrow

  • C-met Proto-Oncogene Expression in Benign and Malignant Human Prostate Tissues

    Louis L. Pisters;Adel K. El-Naggar;Weiping Luo;Anais Malpica

  • Presalvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

    Philippe E. Spiess;Andrew K. Lee;Dan Leibovici;Xuemei Wang

  • Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus

    Jonathan C Nesbitt;Ernesto R Soltero;Colin P.N Dinney;Garrett L Walsh

  • Multimodality Management of Urachal Carcinoma: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience

    Arlene O Siefker-Radtke;Jason R. Gee;Yu-Lin Shen;Sijin Wen

  • Prediction of Erectile Function Following Treatment for Prostate Cancer

    Mehrdad Alemozaffar;Meredith M. Regan;Matthew R. Cooperberg;John T. Wei

  • Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients.

    Ashish M. Kamat;Colin P. N. Dinney;Jason R. Gee;H. Barton Grossman

  • Best practice statement on cryosurgery for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

    Richard J. Babaian;Bryan Donnelly;Duke Bahn;John G. Baust

  • The Efficacy and Complications of Salvage Cryotherapy of the Prostate

    Louis L. Pisters;Andrew C. von Eschenbach;Shellie M. Scott;David A. Swanson

  • Evidence supporting preoperative chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective review of the M. D. Anderson cancer experience.

    Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke;Colin P. Dinney;Neil A. Abrahams;Cesar Moran

  • PCAT-1, a long noncoding RNA, regulates BRCA2 and controls homologous recombination in cancer

    John R. Prensner;Wei Chen;Matthew K. Iyer;Qi Cao

  • PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH SARCOMATOID RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

    Badar M Mian;Nishin A. Bhadkamkar;Joel W. Slaton;Peter W. T. Pisters

  • The case for early cystectomy in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma.

    Ashish M. Kamat;Jason R. Gee;Colin P.N. Dinney;H. Barton Grossman

  • Depressive Symptoms and Cortisol Rhythmicity Predict Survival in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of Inflammatory Signaling

    Lorenzo Cohen;Steven W. Cole;Anil K. Sood;Sarah Prinsloo

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Carcinoma: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience

    Curtis A. Pettaway;Louis L. Pisters;Colin P.N. Dinney;Fe Jularbal

  • Salvage Prostate Cryoablation: Initial Results From the Cryo On-Line Data Registry

    Louis L. Pisters;John C. Rewcastle;Bryan J. Donnelly;Franco M. Lugnani

  • ADULT PROSTATE SARCOMA: THE M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER EXPERIENCE

    Wade J. Sexton;Raymond E. Lance;Adriana O. Reyes;Peter W.T. Pisters

  • Lymph Node Density Is Superior to TNM Nodal Status in Predicting Disease-Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Pooled Data From MDACC and MSKCC

    Wassim Kassouf;Piyush K. Agarwal;Harry W. Herr;Mark F. Munsell

  • An Assessment of Quality of Life Following Radical Prostatectomy, High Dose External Beam Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy Iodine Implantation as Monotherapies for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Steven Jay Frank;Louis L Pisters;John W Davis;Andrew K. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Curtis A. Pettaway
Curtis A. Pettaway The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ashish M. Kamat
Ashish M. Kamat The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Colin P. Dinney
Colin P. Dinney The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Deborah A. Kuban
Deborah A. Kuban The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Patricia Troncoso
Patricia Troncoso The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Christopher G. Wood
Christopher G. Wood The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Surena F. Matin
Surena F. Matin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Christopher J. Logothetis
Christopher J. Logothetis The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Xuemei Wang
Xuemei Wang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
H. Barton Grossman
H. Barton Grossman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare is an excellent option for students interested in Medicine or seeking flexible learning options. Today, many healthcare careers can be started or advanced through online degrees, featuring various specializations, structures, and pricing.

For those considering healthcare management roles, knowing how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is vital. Accreditation, program format, and curriculum relevance are key factors to assess.

Nurses aiming to advance their qualifications can benefit from online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which provide a flexible, accessible route to a BSN without in-person requirements. For those seeking leadership or advanced clinical roles, pursuing accelerated dnp programs online offers a fast-tracked way to earn a terminal nursing degree, while cheapest online dnp programs can reduce the financial burden.

These options cater to various career goals and life situations, making it easier than ever to advance in the healthcare field without putting your life on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Louis L. Pisters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles