World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Taizo Hogetsu

Taizo Hogetsu

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 43 3278 3055 124 121 136 6390

Taizo Hogetsu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Taizo Hogetsu between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Taizo Hogetsu published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 1 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Taizo Hogetsu: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 2
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 4
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 10
2002 6
2003 8
2004 7
2005 5
2006 11
2007 9
2008 10
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 4
2013 1
2014 6
2015 3
2016 2
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 137
Download as CSV

Taizo Hogetsu publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taizo Hogetsu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 136 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194 136
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Taizo Hogetsu D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taizo Hogetsu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219 43
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genetics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Ecology, Mycorrhiza, Mycelium and Ectomycorrhiza. By researching both Botany and Suillus grevillei, Taizo Hogetsu produces research that crosses academic boundaries. His study in the fields of Species richness and Host under the domain of Ecology overlaps with other disciplines such as Internal transcribed spacer.

The Detrended correspondence analysis research Taizo Hogetsu does as part of his general Species richness study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Pinaceae, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His Primary succession study incorporates themes from Biological dispersal and Gene flow. His studies deal with areas such as Outcrossing, Strobilus, Mating and Hypha as well as Pinus densiflora.

His most cited work include:

  • Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer–broadleaf forests (342 citations)
  • An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers. (172 citations)
  • Analysis of genetic structure of a Suillus grevillei population in a Larix kaempferi stand by polymorphism of inter‐simple sequence repeat (ISSR) (157 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Taizo Hogetsu mainly investigates Botany, Microsatellite, Genetic structure, Ecology and Genetics. His study in the field of Pinus thunbergii, Fungus and Mycelium is also linked to topics like Mycorrhiza and Ectomycorrhiza. His Pinus thunbergii research includes themes of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Nematode, Inoculation, Cutting and Wilt disease.

His work on Polymorphic Microsatellite Marker as part of general Microsatellite research is frequently linked to Genetic marker, bridging the gap between disciplines. His work carried out in the field of Genetic structure brings together such families of science as Seed dispersal and Robinia. His work in the fields of Volcanic desert and Primary succession overlaps with other areas such as Salix reinii.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (71.76%)
  • Microsatellite (28.24%)
  • Genetic structure (16.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2021)?

  • Botany (71.76%)
  • Pinus thunbergii (10.69%)
  • Genetic diversity (11.45%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Botany, Pinus thunbergii, Genetic diversity, Biological dispersal and Ecology. His studies in Botany integrate themes in fields like Inoculation and Host. His research integrates issues of Woody plant and Mycelium in his study of Pinus thunbergii.

His work on Gene flow as part of general Genetic diversity research is frequently linked to Mesorhizobium, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. Taizo Hogetsu has included themes like Zoology and Ilex integra in his Biological dispersal study. His Ecology study typically links adjacent topics like Genetic structure.

Between 2008 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Genotypic analysis of the foliose lichen Parmotrema tinctorum using microsatellite markers: association of mycobiont and photobiont, and their reproductive modes (31 citations)
  • Reproduction of a Robinia pseudoacacia population in a coastal Pinus thunbergii windbreak along the Kujukurihama Coast, Japan. (29 citations)
  • Regeneration of Robinia pseudoacacia riparian forests after clear-cutting along the Chikumagawa River in Japan (27 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genetics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Pinus thunbergii, Asexual reproduction, Plant ecology and Robinia. His Botany research integrates issues from Inoculation and Host. His Pinus thunbergii course of study focuses on Woody plant and Pith, Staining and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Taizo Hogetsu works mostly in the field of Asexual reproduction, limiting it down to topics relating to Sexual reproduction and, in certain cases, Foliose lichen, Lichen, Thallus and Isidium. His Plant ecology research incorporates elements of Plant breeding, Windbreak, Shoot and Clearcutting. Taizo Hogetsu combines subjects such as Basidiomycota and Mycelium with his study of Hypha.

Best Publications

  • Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer–broadleaf forests

    Takahide A. Ishida;Kazuhide Nara;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Tricholoma matsutake in a natural Pinus densiflora forest: correspondence between above- and below-ground genets, association with multiple host trees and alteration of existing ectomycorrhizal communities.

    Chunlan Lian;Maki Narimatsu;Kazuhide Nara;Taizo Hogetsu

  • ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON ESTABLISHED SHRUBS FACILITATE SUBSEQUENT SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT OF SUCCESSIONAL PLANT SPECIES

    Kazuhide Nara;Taizo Hogetsu

  • An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers.

    Chunlan L. Lian;Md. Abdul Wadud;Qifang Geng;Kenichiro Shimatani

  • Development of microsatellite markers in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) using a dual‐supression‐PCR technique

    C. Lian;T. Hogetsu

  • Underground primary succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a volcanic desert on Mount Fuji

    Kazuhide Nara;Hironobu Nakaya;Bingyun Wu;Zhihua Zhou

  • Analysis of genetic structure of a Suillus grevillei population in a Larix kaempferi stand by polymorphism of inter‐simple sequence repeat (ISSR)

    Zhihua Zhou;Makoto Miwa;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Ectomycorrhizal sporocarp succession and production during early primary succession on Mount Fuji

    Kazuhide Nara;Hironobu Nakaya;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism

    Chunlan Lian;Makoto Miwa;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Genetic structure and reproduction dynamics of Salix reinii during primary succession on Mount Fuji, as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite analysis.

    Chunlan Lian;Ryuya Oishi;Naoya Miyashita;Kazuhide Nara

  • A Simple Method for Developing Microsatellite Markers using Amplified Fragments of Inter-simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR)

    Chunlan Lian;Zhihua Zhou;Taizo Hogetsu

  • MICROSATELLITE MARKERS REVEAL POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE ALEXANDRIUM TAMARENSE (DINOPHYCEAE) IN JAPANESE COASTAL WATERS1

    Satoshi Nagai;Chunlan Lian;Sanae Yamaguchi;Masami Hamaguchi

  • Involvement of cellulose synthesis in actions of gibberellin and kinetin on cell expansion. 2,6-Dicholorobenzonitrile as a new cellulose-synthesis inhibitor

    Taizo Hogetsu;Hiroh Shibaoka;Masami Shimokoriyama

  • Germination and infectivity of ectomycorrhizal fungal spores in relation to their ecological traits during primary succession.

    Takahide A. Ishida;Takahide A. Ishida;Kazuhide Nara;Megumi Tanaka;Akihiko Kinoshita

  • Can 14C‐labeled photosynthetic products move between Pinus densiflora seedlings linked by ectomycorrhizal mycelia?

    Bingyun Wu;Kazuhide Nara;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Competition between ectomycorrhizal fungi colonizing Pinus densiflora

    B. Wu;K. Nara;T. Hogetsu

  • Flavonoids induce germination of basidiospores of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus bovinus

    Kensuke Kikuchi;Norihisa Matsushita;Kazuo Suzuki;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a primary successional volcanic desert on the southeast slope of Mount Fuji

    Bingyun Wu;Taizo Hogetsu;Katsunori Isobe;Ryuichi Ishii

  • Spatial distribution of the subterranean mycelia and ectomycorrhizae of Suillus grevillei genets

    Zhihua Zhou;Makoto Miwa;Yosuke Matsuda;Taizo Hogetsu

  • Mating system, pollen and propagule dispersal, and spatial genetic structure in a high-density population of the mangrove tree Kandelia candel.

    Qifang Geng;Chunlan Lian;Susumu Goto;Jianmin Tao

Frequent Co-Authors

Kazuhide Nara
Kazuhide Nara University of Tokyo
Rongliang Qiu
Rongliang Qiu South China Agricultural University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Taizo Hogetsu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles