World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4822 4466 343 329 172 6126

Paola Escudero publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paola Escudero between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paola Escudero published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 18 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
2000 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paola Escudero: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 10
2008 5
2009 6
2010 12
2011 9
2012 6
2013 8
2014 16
2015 18
2016 13
2017 8
2018 8
2019 10
2020 9
2021 6
2022 8
2023 8
2024 9
2025 9
Total 197
Download as CSV

Paola Escudero publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paola Escudero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 172 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 172
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Paola Escudero D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paola Escudero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Paola Escudero is affiliated with Western Sydney University in Australia and has contributed research primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including developmental and educational psychology, linguistics and language, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research focuses extensively on topics such as phonetics and phonology research, linguistic variation and morphology, language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, multilingual education and policy, child and animal learning development, and speech and dialogue systems.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include Frontiers in Psychology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Languages, Frontiers in Communication, and Language Learning.

Among notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Paola Escudero are:

  • Probability of Heritage Language Use at a Supportive Early Childhood Setting in Australia, 2020, Frontiers in Education
  • Four-Year-Old's Online Versus Face-to-Face Word Learning via eBooks, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Cross-Situational Word Learning in Two Foreign Languages: Effects of Native Language and Perceptual Difficulty, 2020, Frontiers in Communication
  • The Role of Acoustic Similarity and Non-Native Categorisation in Predicting Non-Native Discrimination: Brazilian Portuguese Vowels by English vs. Spanish Listeners, 2021, Languages
  • Evidence-Based Design Principles for Spanish Pronunciation Teaching, 2021, Frontiers in Communication

They have collaborated frequently with co-authors including Jaydene Elvin, Weicong Li, Kakeru Yazawa, Alba Tuninetti, and Gloria Pino Escobar. These collaborations reflect ongoing engagement with researchers active in related domains.

The combination of publication venues, research topics, and collaborative network highlights a research profile centered on language acquisition, phonetics, and cognitive processes related to language and communication development, particularly in multilingual and educational settings.

Best Publications

  • BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION RESEARCH AND PHONOLOGICAL THEORY

    Paola Escudero;Paul Boersma

  • Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access

    Paola Escudero;Rachel Hayes-Harb;Holger Mitterer

  • A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese

    Paola Escudero;Paul Boersma;Andréia Schurt Rauber;Ricardo A. H. Bion

  • Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: the L2LP model revised.

    Jan-Willem van Leussen;Paola Escudero

  • Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners

    Paola Escudero;Titia Benders;Silvia C. Lipski

  • The Effect of L1 Orthography on Non-Native Vowel Perception.

    Paola Escudero;Karin Wanrooij

  • Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic catergories: an integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories

    P. Boersma;P. Escudero;R. Hayes

  • The linguistic perception of SIMILAR L2 sounds

    Paola Escudero

  • The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: Multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish

    Paola Escudero;Paul Boersma

  • Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input

    Bene Bassetti;Paola Escudero;Rachel Hayes-Harb

  • Weighting of vowel cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning.

    Suzanne Curtin;Christopher Fennell;Paola Escudero

  • Enhanced bimodal distributions facilitate the learning of second language vowels

    Paola Escudero;Titia Benders;Karin Wanrooij

  • Modelling the perceptual development of phonological contrasts with Optimality Theory and the Gradual Learning Algorithm.

    Paola Escudero;Paul Boersma

  • Context-specific acoustic differences between Peruvian and Iberian Spanish vowels.

    Kateřina Chládková;Paola Escudero;Paul Boersma

  • The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception

    Paola Escudero;Ellen Simon;Holger Mitterer

  • Learning words in a new language: orthography doesn't always help

    Paola Escudero;Ellen Simon;Karen E. Mulak

  • A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English.

    Daniel Williams;Paola Escudero

  • Dynamic acoustic properties of monophthongs and diphthongs in Western Sydney Australian English

    Jaydene Elvin;Daniel Williams;Paola Escudero

  • Spanish listeners' perception of American and Southern British English vowels.

    Paola Escudero;Kateřina Chládková

  • The Interrelation between the Perception and Production of English Vowels by Native Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese

    Andréia S. Rauber;Paola Escudero;Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann Bion;Barbara O. Baptista

  • Developmental patterns in the adult L2 acquisition of new contrasts: the acoustic cue weighting in the perception of Scottish tense/lax vowels by Spanish speakers

    Paola Escudero

  • The linguistic perception of similar L2 sounds

    P. Escudero;P. Boersma;S. Hamann

Frequent Co-Authors

Denis K Burnham
Denis K Burnham Western Sydney University
Scott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
John Hajek
John Hajek University of Melbourne
Carel ten Cate
Carel ten Cate Leiden University
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Catherine T. Best
Catherine T. Best Haskins Laboratories
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Niels O. Schiller
Niels O. Schiller Leiden University
Evan Kidd
Evan Kidd Australian National University
Linda Polka
Linda Polka McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences or Humanities? There are many flexible online degree options in the USA that can kickstart or advance your journey. For students seeking affordability, exploring the cheapest online psychology degree programs can help you earn a respected qualification without extensive debt.

If you're interested in community impact and direct client work, a masters in social work opens doors in social services, healthcare, and policy roles. For those aiming for advanced clinical or counseling careers, consider an online psyd program, which focuses on clinical practice and professional psychology.

Aspiring to specialize in family dynamics or relationship counseling? Accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited can lead to licensure and practice as a therapist. With these varied pathways, you can match your academic interests and career ambitions with accessible, quality online education.

Best Scientists Citing Paola Escudero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles