World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
41
Citations
9682
World Ranking
3591
National Ranking
902

R. Michael Miller publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Michael Miller sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 72 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

R. Michael Miller D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Michael Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses

    Nancy Collins Johnson;Gail W. T. Wilson;Matthew A. Bowker;Jacqueline A. Wilson

  • Contributions of interacting biological mechanisms to soil aggregate stabilization in restored prairie

    J.D. Jastrow;R.M. Miller;J. Lussenhop

  • Carbon Dynamics of Aggregate-Associated Organic Matter Estimated by Carbon-13 Natural Abundance

    J. D. Jastrow;R. M. Miller;T. W. Boutton

  • Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the Law of the Minimum

    Nancy Collins Johnson;Gail W. T. Wilson;Jacqueline A. Wilson;R. Michael Miller

  • Soil aggregate stabilization and carbon sequestration: Feedbacks through organomineral associations

    J.D. Jastrow;R.M. Miller

  • Carbon cycling by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil-plant systems.

    Yong-Guan Zhu;R Michael Miller

  • Changes in Soil Microbial Community Structure in a Tallgrass Prairie Chronosequence

    Victoria J. Allison;R. Michael Miller;Julie D. Jastrow;Roser Matamala

  • Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide increases soil carbon

    Julie D. Jastrow;R. Michael Miller;Roser Matamala;Richard J. Norby

  • Some occurrences of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural and disturbed ecosystems of the Red Desert

    R. Michael Miller

  • The GAAS metagenomic tool and its estimations of viral and microbial average genome size in four major biomes.

    Florent E. Angly;Dana Willner;Alejandra Prieto-Davó;Robert A. Edwards;Robert A. Edwards

  • Evidence of a mycorrhizal mechanism for the adaptation of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) to high- and low-nutrient prairies.

    Peggy A. Schultz;R. Michael Miller;Julie D. Jastrow;Claudia V. Rivetta

  • Mycorrhizal mediated feedbacks influence net carbon gain and nutrient uptake in Andropogon gerardii

    R. M. Miller;S. P. Miller;J. D. Jastrow;C. B. Rivetta

  • Mycorrhizal status of the genus Carex (Cyperaceae).

    R. Michael Miller;Christopher I. Smith;Julie D. Jastrow;James D. Bever

  • Decline of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in northern hardwood forests exposed to chronic nitrogen additions.

    Linda T. A. Van Diepen;Erik A. Lilleskov;Kurt S. Pregitzer;R. Michael Miller

  • Simulated Nitrogen Deposition Causes a Decline of Intra- and Extraradical Abundance of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Changes in Microbial Community Structure in Northern Hardwood Forests

    Linda T. A. van Diepen;Linda T. A. van Diepen;Erik A. Lilleskov;Kurt S. Pregitzer;R. Michael Miller

  • From Lilliput to Brobdingnag: Extending Models of Mycorrhizal Function across Scales

    Nancy Collins Johnson;Jason D. Hoeksema;James D. Bever;V. Bala Chaudhary

  • Intra-annual changes in biomass, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics at 4-year old switchgrass field trials in west Tennessee, USA

    C. T. Garten;Jeffery L. Smith;Donald D. Tyler;James E. Amonette

  • Long-term effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on below-ground biomass and transformations to soil organic matter in grassland.

    J.D. Jastrow;R.M. Miller;C.E. Owensby

  • Fungi in the future: interannual variation and effects of atmospheric change on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities

    T. E. Anne Cotton;T. E. Anne Cotton;T. E. Anne Cotton;Alastair H. Fitter;R. Michael Miller;Alex J. Dumbrell

  • Empirical estimates to reduce modeling uncertainties of soil organic carbon in permafrost regions: a review of recent progress and remaining challenges

    U. Mishra;J. D. Jastrow;R. Matamala;Gustaf Hugelius

  • Response of “Alamo” switchgrass tissue chemistry and biomass to nitrogen fertilization in West Tennessee, USA

    Charles T. Garten;Deanne J. Brice;Hector F. Castro;Robin L. Graham

  • The nonmycorrhizal root--a strategy for survival in nutrient-impoverished soils.

    R. Michael Miller

  • Mycorrhizas: Gene to function

    James H. Graham;R. Michael Miller

  • Fungal Genome Sequencing and Bioenergy

    Scott E. Baker;Jette Thykaer;Jette Thykaer;William S. Adney;Thomas S. Brettin

  • Genotypic diversity effects on biomass production in native perennial bioenergy cropping systems

    Geoffrey P. Morris;Zhenbin Hu;Paul P. Grabowski;Justin O. Borevitz

  • Assessing Soil Microbial Community Composition Across Landscapes: Do Surface Soils Reveal Patterns?

    Victoria J. Allison;Zhanna Yermakov;R. Michael Miller;Julie D. Jastrow

  • Plant Diversity and Fertilizer Management Shape the Belowground Microbiome of Native Grass Bioenergy Feedstocks.

    Daniel Revillini;Gail W T Wilson;R Michael Miller;Ryan Lancione

  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Grassland Ecosystems

    R. Michael Miller;Gail W. T. Wilson;Nancy C. Johnson

  • Utilizing mycorrhizal responses to guide selective breeding for agricultural sustainability

    Adam B. Cobb;Eric B. Duell;Kaitlin B. Haase;R. Michael Miller

  • The Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature

    R. Michael Miller

  • Influence on Soil Structure Supports Agricultural Role for Prairies, Prairie Restoration

    R. Michael Miller;Julie D. Jastrow

  • Chapter 3 Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Grassland Ecosystems

    R. Michael Miller;Nancy C. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie D. Jastrow
Julie D. Jastrow Argonne National Laboratory
Nancy Collins Johnson
Nancy Collins Johnson Northern Arizona University
Gail W. T. Wilson
Gail W. T. Wilson Oklahoma State University
Roser Matamala
Roser Matamala Argonne National Laboratory
Erik A. Lilleskov
Erik A. Lilleskov US Forest Service
James D. Bever
James D. Bever University of Kansas
Christopher W. Schadt
Christopher W. Schadt Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Kurt S. Pregitzer
Kurt S. Pregitzer University of Idaho
Matthew A. Bowker
Matthew A. Bowker Northern Arizona University
Gerald A. Tuskan
Gerald A. Tuskan Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing R. Michael Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles