World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
9863
World Ranking
9118
National Ranking
3876

Mark Liberman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Liberman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 177 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Liberman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Liberman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Liberman is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on areas within computer science and psychology.

Their work includes significant contributions to the subfields of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, signal processing, and psychiatry and mental health. These areas reflect a broad approach to understanding human language, cognition, and related disorders through computational and psychological methods.

Liberman's research topics cover a variety of subjects, including:

  • Neurobiology of language and bilingualism
  • Language development and disorders
  • Speech recognition and synthesis
  • Voice and speech disorders
  • Phonetics and phonology research
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Music and audio processing

Their recent publications demonstrate an interdisciplinary focus on language and cognitive disorders, as well as computational approaches in neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Notable papers include:

  • Natural language processing methods are sensitive to sub-clinical linguistic differences in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 2021, Schizophrenia
  • Birdsong Learning and Culture: Analogies with Human Spoken Language, 2020, Annual Review of Linguistics
  • Automated analysis of lexical features in frontotemporal degeneration, 2021, Cortex
  • Lexical and Acoustic Speech Features Relating to Alzheimer Disease Pathology, 2022, Neurology
  • The Future of Computational Linguistics: On Beyond Alchemy, 2021, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

They frequently collaborate with other researchers, including Sunghye Cho, Naomi Nevler, Murray Grossman, Sharon Ash, and David J. Irwin. These partnerships contribute to a prolific output within their research domains.

Liberman publishes regularly in a range of venues that specialize in neurology, linguistics, and interdisciplinary scientific research. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Best Publications

  • The intonational system of English

    Mark Yoffe Liberman

  • Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus

    Jiahong Yuan;Mark Liberman

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • A formal framework for linguistic annotation

    Steven Bird;Mark Liberman

  • UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and recognizer benchmarks

    I. Guyon;L. Schomaker;R. Plamondon;M. Liberman

  • Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production

    Claude Barras;Edouard Geoffrois;Zhibiao Wu;Mark Liberman

  • Towards an Integrated Understanding of Speaking Rate in Conversation

    Jiahong Yuan;Mark Liberman;Christopher Cieri

  • Integrated Annotation for Biomedical Information Extraction

    Seth Kulick;Ann Bies;Mark Liberman;Mark Mandel

  • The Stress and Structure of Modified Noun Phrases in English

    Mark Liberman;Richard Sproat

  • The Second DIHARD Diarization Challenge: Dataset, Task, and Baselines.

    Neville Ryant;Kenneth Church;Christopher Cieri;Alejandrina Cristià

  • Transcriber: a free tool for segmenting, labeling and transcribing speech

    Claude Barras;Edouard Geoffrois;Zhibiao Wu;Mark Liberman

  • Text Analysis and Word Pronunciation in Text-to-speech Synthesis

    Mark Y. Liberman;Kenneth W. Church

  • BITS: a method for bilingual text search over the Web

    Xiaoyi Ma;Mark Y. Liberman

  • ATLAS: A Flexible and Extensible Architecture for Linguistic Annotation

    Steven Bird;David Day;John S. Garofolo;John Henderson

  • Speech activity detection on youtube using deep neural networks.

    Neville Ryant;Mark Liberman;Jiahong Yuan

  • THE TDT-2 TEXT AND SPEECH CORPUS

    Chris Cieri;David Graff;Mark Liberman;Nii Martey

  • Synthesis by rule of english intonation patterns

    M. Anderson;J. Pierrehumbert;M. Liberman

  • The Phonetic Interpretation of Tone in Igbo

    M. Liberman;J. M. Schultz;Soonhyun Hong;V. Okeke

  • Natural language processing methods are sensitive to sub-clinical linguistic differences in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

    Sunny X. Tang;Reno Kriz;Sunghye Cho;Suh Jung Park

  • A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English

    Ezra Black;Steven Abney;Dan Flickinger;Claudia Gdaniec

  • A Context Pattern Induction Method for Named Entity Extraction

    Partha Pratim Talukdar;Thorsten Brants;Mark Liberman;Fernando Pereira

  • The Third DIHARD Diarization Challenge

    Neville Ryant;Prachi Singh;Venkat Krishnamohan;Rajat Varma

  • A Formal Framework for Linguistic Annotation (revised version)

    Steven Bird;Mark Liberman

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
David J. Irwin
David J. Irwin University of Pennsylvania
Steven Bird
Steven Bird Charles Darwin University
Kenneth Church
Kenneth Church Baidu (China)
Robert T. Schultz
Robert T. Schultz Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Janet B. Pierrehumbert
Janet B. Pierrehumbert University of Oxford
Jun Du
Jun Du University of Science and Technology of China
Fernando Pereira
Fernando Pereira Google (United States)
Stephen E. Levinson
Stephen E. Levinson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Computer Science, it’s worth exploring related online programs that can offer flexibility and strong career outcomes. For those looking to fast-track their education, you can find guidance on the quickest degree to get online, which highlights accelerated options leading to well-paying jobs.

As technology evolves, artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest-growing fields. Explore the best online masters in ai to discover affordable programs designed to help you specialize in AI and machine learning, even if you’re starting from a Computer Science background.

When evaluating your study options, it’s useful to consider the best college majors that align with industry demand. Computer Science remains a top choice, but other technology-related majors may also offer excellent prospects.

For those interested in postgraduate study, some may prefer programs that are less intensive. Check out a list of easy masters programs that balance career growth with manageable coursework. These resources can help you make informed decisions and shape your career path in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Liberman

Trending Scientists