World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7644
World Ranking
7164
National Ranking
23

Roderick Duncan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick Duncan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 116 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Roderick Duncan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick Duncan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roderick Duncan is affiliated with Christchurch Hospital in New Zealand and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine with a focus on psychiatry, mental health, and neurology. Their research portfolio comprises 31 publications spanning several subfields including psychiatry and mental health, rheumatology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, and genetics.

Their work prominently covers topics related to psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, epilepsy research and treatment, neurology and historical studies, acute ischemic stroke management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, and mental health and psychiatry.

Notable recent papers by Roderick Duncan include:

  • Routine Use of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2021, Stroke
  • Incidence and prevalence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in a Norwegian county: A 10-year population-based study, 2021, Epilepsia
  • Functional neurological disorders presenting as emergencies to secondary care, 2021, European Journal of Neurology
  • The effect of attachment style on long-term outcomes in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Results from a prospective study, 2022, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Perspectives on a name, 2020, Epilepsy & Behavior

Roderick Duncan has collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Antonia Villagrán, Morten I. Lossius, James Beharry, Teddy Y. Wu, and Campbell Le Heron. These partnerships have contributed to a range of research outputs primarily within neurological and psychiatric domains.

Their publications are mostly featured in journals such as:

  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Epilepsia
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Stroke
  • European Journal of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Minimum requirements for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a staged approach: a report from the International League Against Epilepsy Nonepileptic Seizures Task Force.

    W. Curt LaFrance;W. Curt LaFrance;Gus A. Baker;Rod Duncan;Laura H. Goldstein

  • Who is referred to neurology clinics? - The diagnoses made in 3781 new patients

    Jon C Stone;Alan J Carson;Roderick D D Duncan;Richard C Roberts

  • Guideline Development Group

    Andrew Elder;Richard Davenport;Roderick Duncan;Consultant Neurologist

  • Disability, distress and unemployment in neurology outpatients with symptoms ‘unexplained by organic disease’

    Alan J Carson;Jon C Stone;Carina Hibberd;Gordon Murray

  • A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect on Cognitive Function of Topiramate Compared with Valproate as Add‐On Therapy to Carbamazepine in Patients with Partial‐Onset Seizures

    A P Aldenkamp;G Baker;O G Mulder;D Chadwick

  • Newly presenting psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: incidence, population characteristics, and early outcome from a prospective audit of a first seizure clinic.

    Roderick Duncan;Saif Razvi;Sharon Mulhern

  • Ictal/postictal SPECT in the pre-surgical localisation of complex partial seizures.

    R Duncan;J Patterson;R Roberts;D M Hadley

  • Dose-dependent Safety and Efficacy of Zonisamide: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Patients with Refractory Partial Seizures

    Martin J. Brodie;Roderick Duncan;Herve Vespignani;Andras Solyom

  • Late onset psychogenic nonepileptic attacks.

    Roderick Duncan;Meritxell Oto;Emma Martin;Anthony Pelosi

  • Functional (conversion) neurological symptoms: Research since the millennium

    Alan J. Carson;Richard Brown;Anthony S. David;Roderick Duncan

  • The aetiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: risk factors and comorbidities.

    Stoyan Popkirov;Ali A. Asadi-Pooya;Roderick Duncan;David Gigineishvili

  • PNES around the world: where we are now and how we can close the diagnosis and treatment gaps. An ILAE PNES Task Force report

    Kousuke Kanemoto;W. Curt LaFrance;Roderick Duncan;David Gigineishvili

  • Psychopathology in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability; an investigation of potential explanatory variables

    C A Espie;J Watkins;L Curtice;A Espie

  • Clinical differences between patients with nonepileptic seizures who report antecedent sexual abuse and those who do not

    Mhairi Selkirk;Roderick Duncan;Meritxell Oto;Anthony Pelosi

  • Outpatient video EEG recording in the diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures: a randomised controlled trial of simple suggestion techniques

    A. Mcgonigal;M. Oto;A. J. C. Russell;J. Greene

  • Gender differences in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

    M. Oto;P. Conway;A. McGonigal;A.J. Russell

  • Neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1-year outcome.

    Michael C Sharpe;Jon C Stone;Carina Hibberd;Charles P Warlow

  • Recollection of vivid memories after perirhinal region stimulations: synchronization in the theta range of spatially distributed brain areas

    Emmanuel Barbeau;Fabrice Wendling;Jean Régis;Roderick Duncan

  • Access to diagnostic and therapeutic facilities for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: An international survey by the ILAE PNES Task Force

    Coraline Hingray;Wissam El-Hage;Rod Duncan;David Gigineishvili

  • Blindness in eclampsia: CT and MR imaging.

    R Duncan;D Hadley;I Bone;E M Symonds

  • Newly diagnosed psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Health care demand prior to and following diagnosis at a first seizure clinic

    Saif Razvi;Sharon Mulhern;Roderick Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Reuber
Markus Reuber University of Sheffield
Aileen McGonigal
Aileen McGonigal Aix-Marseille University
Colin A. Espie
Colin A. Espie University of Oxford
Patrick Chauvel
Patrick Chauvel University of Pittsburgh
Jon Stone
Jon Stone University of Edinburgh
Graeme J. Sills
Graeme J. Sills University of Glasgow
Roger D. Traub
Roger D. Traub IBM (United States)
Martin J. Brodie
Martin J. Brodie University of Glasgow
Richard Appleton
Richard Appleton Alder Hey Children's Hospital
Anthony G Marson
Anthony G Marson University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roderick Duncan

Trending Scientists