World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pamela Gallagher

Pamela Gallagher

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
6141
World Ranking
4820
National Ranking
19

Pamela Gallagher publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Pamela Gallagher D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pamela Gallagher is affiliated with Dublin City University in Ireland. Their scholarly work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a substantial focus on Oncology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered by their research include cancer survivorship and care, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, family support in illness, palliative care and end-of-life issues, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and cancer-related cognitive impairment studies.

Gallagher's recent papers include:

  • FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Tumor Mutational Burden-High Solid Tumors, 2021, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Unmet supportive care needs associated with quality of life for people with lung cancer: A systematic review of the evidence 2007-2020, 2021, European Journal of Cancer Care
  • FDA Approval Summary: Rucaparib for the Treatment of Patients with Deleterious BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, 2020, The Oncologist
  • Assistive technologies, educational engagement and psychosocial outcomes among students with disabilities in higher education, 2020, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
  • Health-related quality of life in adults with low-grade gliomas: a systematic review, 2022, Quality of Life Research

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Gallagher include Linda Sharp, Simon Dunne, Ben Rimmer, Lizzie Dutton, and Joanne Lewis.

Their work has been published in various venues, notably the Journal of Cancer Survivorship, BMJ Open, European Journal of Cancer Care, Psycho-Oncology, and Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, reflecting repeated contributions to these journals.

Best Publications

  • Participation in communication and decision-making: children and young people's experiences in a hospital setting.

    Imelda Coyne;Pamela Gallagher

  • Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES).

    Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm MacLachlan

  • The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation.

    Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm MacLachlan

  • Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit.

    Deirdre Desmond;Natasha Ann Layton;Jacob A. Bentley;Fleur H. Boot

  • Adjustment to an Artificial Limb: A Qualitative Perspective

    Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm Maclachlan

  • Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: a descriptive analysis.

    Pamela Gallagher;David Allen;Malcolm MacLachlan

  • The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review.

    Aoife McNicholl;Hannah Casey;Deirdre Desmond;Pamela Gallagher

  • Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

    Laura Coffey;Conor Mahon;Pamela Gallagher

  • Environmental barriers, activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by people with major limb amputation.

    Pamela Gallagher;Mary-Ann O’Donovan;Anne Doyle;Deirdre Desmond

  • Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs.

    Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm MacLachlan

  • Psychosocial adjustment to diabetes-related lower limb amputation.

    L. Coffey;P. Gallagher;O. Horgan;D. Desmond

  • Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and rasch analysis.

    Pamela Gallagher;F. Franchignoni;A. Giordano;M. MacLachlan

  • Psychological variables associated with quality of life following primary treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2015

    Simon Dunne;Orla Mooney;Laura Coffey;Linda Sharp

  • Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users

    Elisabeth Schaffalitzky;Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm Maclachlan;Nicola Ryall

  • Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use.

    Elisabeth Schaffalitzky;Pamela Gallagher;Malcolm MacLachlan;Stephen T. Wegener

  • Body image in people with lower-limb amputation: A Rasch analysis of the amputee body image scale

    Pamela Gallagher;Olga Horgan;Franco Franchignoni;Andrea Giordano

  • The Paralympic athlete: a systematic review of the psychosocial literature.

    Philip Jefferies;Pamela Gallagher;Simon Dunne

  • Pain and psychosocial adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users

    Deirdre Desmond;Pamela Gallagher;David Henderson-Slater;Rob Chatfield

  • Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: a systematic review.

    M O'Connor;P Gallagher;J Waller;CM Martin

  • Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb.

    P. Gallagher;M. MacLachlan

  • Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer and a two‐item depression screen (Patient Health Questionnaire‐2) with a ‘help’ question for psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer

    Dermot Anthony Ryan;Pamela Gallagher;Shelagh Wright;Eugene M. Cassidy

Frequent Co-Authors

Malcolm MacLachlan
Malcolm MacLachlan National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Jo Waller
Jo Waller King's College London
Joan K. Austin
Joan K. Austin Indiana University
Oliver FitzGerald
Oliver FitzGerald University College Dublin
Michal Molcho
Michal Molcho University of Galway
Mark Walterfang
Mark Walterfang University of Melbourne
John E. Pachankis
John E. Pachankis Yale University
Zahinoor Ismail
Zahinoor Ismail University of Calgary
Nathalie Jette
Nathalie Jette Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, a range of online degrees offer flexible learning and numerous career opportunities. One popular path is in counseling, with cacrep-accredited counseling programs ensuring you receive industry-recognized training essential for licensure and professional practice.

Another in-demand field is marriage and family therapy. Accredited and online marriage and family therapy programs are tailored for those looking to specialize in helping couples and families navigate complex relationships.

Psychology remains a cornerstone of Social Sciences, and finding the cheapest online psychology degree can make quality education accessible for anyone driven by a passion for human behavior and mental health.

For those aiming to impact communities directly, the easiest online msw program options provide streamlined pathways into social work. These degrees not only open doors to meaningful careers but also address urgent social needs with practical training and support.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles