World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
22166
World Ranking
2838
National Ranking
1318

Ken D. McCarthy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken D. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 101 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ken D. McCarthy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken D. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken D. McCarthy is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with significant contributions also in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The research output of Ken D. McCarthy includes investigations within several subfields such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, physiology, cell biology, and cognitive neuroscience. These reflect a broad engagement with biological mechanisms at the cellular level as well as functional aspects related to nervous system processes.

Key topics explored in their work encompass neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, pain mechanisms and treatments, neuropeptides and animal physiology, neuroscience and neural engineering, nerve injury and regeneration, microtubule and mitosis dynamics, along with receptor mechanisms and signaling. These themes point to a multifaceted approach centered on the nervous system and its biochemical and physiological regulation.

McCarthy has published extensively in venues such as UNC Libraries, which accounts for a majority of their publications, as well as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, the 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'22), and Science Signaling.

Frequent collaborators include Alison Xiaoqiao Xie, Kristen B. Casper, Sarah Taves, Jeremy Petravicz, and Todd A. Fiacco, indicating a network of partnerships that spans various expertise within neuroscience and related fields.

Representative recent papers by Ken D. McCarthy include:

  • Hippocampal Astrocytes In Situ Respond to Glutamate Released from Synaptic Terminals, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Conditional Knock-Out of Kir4.1 Leads to Glial Membrane Depolarization, Inhibition of Potassium and Glutamate Uptake, and Enhanced Short-Term Synaptic Potentiation, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Intracellular Astrocyte Calcium Waves In Situ Increase the Frequency of Spontaneous AMPA Receptor Currents in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Sensory satellite glial Gq-GPCR activation alleviates inflammatory pain via peripheral adenosine 1 receptor activation, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Implication of Kir4.1 Channel in Excess Potassium Clearance: An In Vivo Study on Anesthetized Glial-Conditional Kir4.1 Knock-Out Mice, 2021, UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue.

    K D McCarthy;J de Vellis

  • Astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks.

    Olivier Pascual;Kristen B. Casper;Cathryn Kubera;Jing Zhang

  • What Is the Role of Astrocyte Calcium in Neurophysiology

    Cendra Agulhon;Jeremy Petravicz;Allison B. McMullen;Elizabeth J. Sweger

  • Hippocampal Astrocytes In Situ Respond to Glutamate Released from Synaptic Terminals

    James T. Porter;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Astrocytic neurotransmitter receptors in situ and in vivo.

    James T Porter;Ken D Mccarthy

  • Conditional Knock-Out of Kir4.1 Leads to Glial Membrane Depolarization, Inhibition of Potassium and Glutamate Uptake, and Enhanced Short-Term Synaptic Potentiation

    Biljana Djukic;Kristen B. Casper;Benjamin D. Philpot;Lih Shen Chin

  • Control of gap-junctional communication in astrocytic networks

    Christian Giaume;Kenny D Mccarthy

  • Hippocampal Short- and Long-Term Plasticity Are Not Modulated by Astrocyte Ca2+ Signaling

    Cendra Agulhon;Todd A. Fiacco;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Hippocampal astrocytes in situ exhibit calcium oscillations that occur independent of neuronal activity.

    Wolfgang J. Nett;Scott H. Oloff;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Intracellular astrocyte calcium waves in situ increase the frequency of spontaneous AMPA receptor currents in CA1 pyramidal neurons.

    Todd A. Fiacco;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Loss of IP3 Receptor-Dependent Ca2+ Increases in Hippocampal Astrocytes Does Not Affect Baseline CA1 Pyramidal Neuron Synaptic Activity

    Jeremy Petravicz;Todd A. Fiacco;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Selective stimulation of astrocyte calcium in situ does not affect neuronal excitatory synaptic activity.

    Todd A. Fiacco;Cendra Agulhon;Sarah R. Taves;Jeremy Petravicz

  • In vivo and in vitro development of serotonergic neurons.

    Jean M. Lauder;James A. Wallace;Helmut Krebs;Peter Petrusz

  • GFAP-positive progenitor cells produce neurons and oligodendrocytes throughout the CNS.

    Kristen B. Casper;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Implication of Kir4.1 Channel in Excess Potassium Clearance: An In Vivo Study on Anesthetized Glial-Conditional Kir4.1 Knock-Out Mice

    Oana Chever;Biljana Djukic;Ken D. McCarthy;Florin Amzica

  • Astroglial Gap Junction Communication Is Increased by Treatment with Either Glutamate or High K+ Concentration

    M. O. Kristian Enkvist;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Engineering GPCR signaling pathways with RASSLs

    Bruce R. Conklin;Edward C. Hsiao;Sylvie Claeysen;Aline Dumuis

  • Astrocyte Calcium Signaling: From Observations to Functions and the Challenges Therein

    Baljit S. Khakh;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Astrocytic Gq-GPCR-Linked IP3R-Dependent Ca2+ Signaling Does Not Mediate Neurovascular Coupling in Mouse Visual Cortex In Vivo

    Daniel E. Bonder;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Astrocyte calcium elevations: Properties, propagation, and effects on brain signaling

    Todd A. Fiacco;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Activation of Protein Kinase C Blocks Astroglial Gap Junction Communication and Inhibits the Spread of Calcium Waves

    M. O. Kristian Enkvist;Ken D. McCarthy

  • Conditional knock-out of K(ir)4.1 leads to glial membrane depolarization, inhibition of potassium and glutamate uptake, and enhanced short-term synaptic Potentiation

    Biljana Djukic;Kristen B. Casper;Benjamin D. Philpot;Lih-Shen Chin

Frequent Co-Authors

Bryan L. Roth
Bryan L. Roth University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Brian Popko
Brian Popko Northwestern University
Pierre Morell
Pierre Morell University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lih-Shen Chin
Lih-Shen Chin Emory University
Jürgen Wess
Jürgen Wess National Institutes of Health
Bruce R. Conklin
Bruce R. Conklin University of California, San Francisco
Benjamin D. Philpot
Benjamin D. Philpot University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sylvie Claeysen
Sylvie Claeysen Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Joël Bockaert
Joël Bockaert University of Montpellier
Debra J. Gilbert
Debra J. Gilbert National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ken D. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles