What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Psychiatry
Her primary areas of investigation include Meta-analysis, Epilepsy, Pediatrics, Incidence and Epidemiology.
Her Meta-analysis research integrates issues from Prevalence, Systematic review, Disease and Confidence interval.
Her Epilepsy study contributes to a more complete understanding of Psychiatry.
Nathalie Jette has included themes like Positive predicative value, Physical therapy, Cerebral palsy and Coding in her Pediatrics study.
In her study, Chronic bronchitis, Proportional hazards model, Risk factor and Hazard ratio is strongly linked to Cohort study, which falls under the umbrella field of Incidence.
Her study explores the link between Epidemiology and topics such as Demography that cross with problems in Young adult.
Her most cited work include:
- The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (909 citations)
- Psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy: a population-based analysis. (699 citations)
- American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version. (608 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her main research concerns Epilepsy, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, Meta-analysis and Epidemiology.
Her Epilepsy research is mostly focused on the topic Epilepsy surgery.
Her research integrates issues of Dementia and Clinical psychology in her study of Psychiatry.
Her studies in Pediatrics integrate themes in fields like Retrospective cohort study and Electroencephalography.
Nathalie Jette works mostly in the field of Meta-analysis, limiting it down to concerns involving Confidence interval and, occasionally, Disease and Emergency medicine.
Her Epidemiology research incorporates themes from Demography and Incidence.
She most often published in these fields:
- Epilepsy (42.51%)
- Psychiatry (25.75%)
- Pediatrics (23.05%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Epilepsy (42.51%)
- Internal medicine (14.67%)
- Confidence interval (12.57%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Nathalie Jette mainly focuses on Epilepsy, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Odds ratio and Stroke.
She does research in Epilepsy, focusing on Epilepsy surgery specifically.
Her Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Depression and Cardiology.
Her Depression research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Meta-analysis and Individual participant data.
Her work carried out in the field of Odds ratio brings together such families of science as Psychological intervention, Disease and Pediatrics.
In her research on the topic of Pediatrics, Electroencephalography is strongly related with Epileptogenesis.
Between 2019 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis (32 citations)
- Epilepsy in older people. (31 citations)
- Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (24 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Psychiatry
Her primary areas of study are Epilepsy, Meta-analysis, Comorbidity, Internal medicine and Odds ratio.
Psychiatry covers Nathalie Jette research in Epilepsy.
Her Meta-analysis research includes themes of Patient Health Questionnaire and Depression.
Her work in Odds ratio addresses subjects such as Odds, which are connected to disciplines such as Clinical psychology, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and CIDI.
As part of one scientific family, Nathalie Jette deals mainly with the area of Medical diagnosis, narrowing it down to issues related to the Pediatrics, and often Incidence.
In her work, Epidemiology is strongly intertwined with Subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is a subfield of Incidence.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
