World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicholas C. Sangster

Nicholas C. Sangster

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
40
Citations
6488
World Ranking
1161
National Ranking
68

Nicholas C. Sangster publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas C. Sangster sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 107 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Nicholas C. Sangster D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas C. Sangster sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Internal medicine

His scientific interests lie mostly in Anthelmintic, Veterinary medicine, Resistance, Drug resistance and Pharmacology. The concepts of his Anthelmintic study are interwoven with issues in Milbemycin, Avermectin, Urine and Area under the curve. Nicholas C. Sangster interconnects Feces and Animal science in the investigation of issues within Veterinary medicine.

His Resistance research incorporates elements of Agriculture, Livestock, Biotechnology and Helminths. His studies deal with areas such as Peak plasma, Divided dose, Haemonchus contortus and Oxfendazole as well as Drug resistance. His work in the fields of Pharmacology, such as Clinical pharmacology, overlaps with other areas such as Infectious disease, Status quo and Macrocyclic lactone.

His most cited work include:

  • Drug resistance in veterinary helminths (643 citations)
  • Anthelmintic resistance: past, present and future (208 citations)
  • Pharmacology of Anthelmintic Resistance (156 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Nicholas C. Sangster spends much of his time researching Anthelmintic, Haemonchus contortus, Veterinary medicine, Pharmacology and Resistance. Nicholas C. Sangster has included themes like In vitro, Ivermectin, Drug resistance, Microbiology and In vivo in his Anthelmintic study. In most of his Drug resistance studies, his work intersects topics such as Helminths.

His Haemonchus contortus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Levamisole, Gene and In vitro toxicology. His Veterinary medicine study combines topics in areas such as Feces and Animal science. The Resistance study combines topics in areas such as Livestock and Biotechnology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Anthelmintic (38.46%)
  • Haemonchus contortus (32.97%)
  • Veterinary medicine (26.37%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2018)?

  • Veterinary medicine (26.37%)
  • Anthelmintic (38.46%)
  • Resistance (13.19%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Nicholas C. Sangster mostly deals with Veterinary medicine, Anthelmintic, Resistance, Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. His Veterinary medicine research includes elements of Feces, Fasciola hepatica, Triclabendazole and Animal science. As a member of one scientific family, Nicholas C. Sangster mostly works in the field of Resistance, focusing on Biotechnology and, on occasion, Livestock.

His work carried out in the field of Ivermectin brings together such families of science as Potency, Haemonchus contortus and In vitro toxicology. His Haemonchus contortus study results in a more complete grasp of Nematode. His studies in Fenbendazole integrate themes in fields like Pyrantel, Parascaris equorum, Ivermectin / Pyrantel and Foal.

Between 2009 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Confirmation of Fasciola hepatica resistant to triclabendazole in naturally infected Australian beef and dairy cattle. (67 citations)
  • Comparative kinetics of serological and coproantigen ELISA and faecal egg count in cattle experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica and following treatment with triclabendazole. (41 citations)
  • The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia (34 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Internal medicine

Nicholas C. Sangster mainly focuses on Veterinary medicine, Anthelmintic, Triclabendazole, Fasciola hepatica and Feces. Nicholas C. Sangster does research in Veterinary medicine, focusing on Fenbendazole specifically. His Anthelmintic research integrates issues from Livestock, Biotechnology and Resistance.

His Triclabendazole study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Drug treatment, Hepatica, Igg elisa, Serology and Egg count. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Dairy cattle, Herd, Animal science, Beef cattle and Liver fluke. His research integrates issues of Pyrantel, Ivermectin and Foal in his study of Feces.

Best Publications

  • Drug resistance in veterinary helminths

    Adrian J. Wolstenholme;Ian Fairweather;Roger Prichard;Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna

  • Anthelmintic resistance: past, present and future

    N.C. Sangster

  • Pharmacology of Anthelmintic Resistance

    N.C Sangster;J Gill

  • Managing parasiticide resistance.

    N.C Sangster

  • Frontiers in anthelmintic pharmacology.

    Timothy G. Geary;Nicholas C. Sangster;David P. Thompson

  • Pharmacology of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes: will it occur with the avermectin/milbemycins?

    N.C. Sangster

  • Confirmation of Fasciola hepatica resistant to triclabendazole in naturally infected Australian beef and dairy cattle.

    Yvette M. Brockwell;Timothy P. Elliott;Glenn R. Anderson;Rex Stanton

  • Disposition of oxfendazole in goats and efficacy compared with sheep

    N.C. Sangster;J.M. Rickard;D.R. Hennessy;J.W. Steel

  • Haemonchus contortus: Sequence Heterogeneity of Internucleotide Binding Domains from P-Glycoproteinsand an Association with Avermectin/Milbemycin Resistance

    Nicholas C. Sangster;Sharron C. Bannan;Anthony S. Weiss;Susan C. Nulf

  • Ten Events That Defined Anthelmintic Resistance Research.

    Nicholas C. Sangster;Ann Cowling;Robert G. Woodgate

  • Parasitism. The ecology and evolution of intimate interactions

    Nicholas C. Sangster

  • Geometric means provide a biased efficacy result when conducting a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT)

    R.J. Dobson;Nicholas Sangster;R. B. Besier;R. G. Woodgate

  • Comparative pharmacokinetic behaviour of albendazole in sheep and goats

    D.R. Hennessy;N.C. Sangster;J.W. Steel;G.H. Collins

  • Comparative kinetics of serological and coproantigen ELISA and faecal egg count in cattle experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica and following treatment with triclabendazole.

    Yvette Brockwell;Terry Spithill;Terry Spithill;Glenn Anderson;Glenn Anderson;Victoria Grillo

  • Efficacy of two cyclooctadepsipeptides, PF1022A and emodepside, against anthelmintic-resistant nematodes in sheep and cattle.

    G. Von Samson-Himmelstjerna;A. Harder;N. C. Sangster;G. C. Coles

  • Evaluation of tests for anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes.

    J.F Pook;M.L Power;N.C Sangster;J.L Hodgson

  • Tubulin and benzimidazole-resistance in Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Nematoda).

    Nicholas C. Sangster;Roger K. Prichard;Ernest Lacey

  • The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia

    Susan Armstrong;Robert Woodgate;Sarah Gough;Jane Heller

  • Resistance to antiparasitic drugs: the role of molecular diagnosis.

    Nicholas Sangster;Phillip Batterham;H.David Chapman;Manoj Duraisingh

  • Pharmacology of anthelmintic resistance.

    N. Sangster

  • Investigation of the mechanism of levamisole resistance in trichostrongylid nematodes of sheep

    N.C. Sangster;F.L. Riley;G.H. Collins

  • Genetic characterisation of Cryptosporidium from a wild population of eastern grey kangaroos Macropus giganteus inhabiting a water catchment.

    Michelle L Power;Martin B Slade;Nicholas C Sangster;Duncan A Veal

  • Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep: parasite fecundity correlates with worm size and host lymphocyte counts.

    Anthony Rowe;Kate McMaster;David Emery;Nicholas Sangster

  • Anthelmintics and ion-channels: after a puncture, use a patch

    Richard J Martin;Iain Murray;Alan P Robertson;Henrik Bjorn

  • Inheritance of levamisole and benzimidazole resistance in an isolate of Haemonchus contortus

    N.C. Sangster;J.M. Redwin;H. Bjorn

  • Closantel resistance in Haemonchus contortus from sheep.

    Rolfe Pf;Boray Jc;Fitzgibbon C;Parsons G

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy G. Geary
Timothy G. Geary McGill University
Terry W. Spithill
Terry W. Spithill La Trobe University
Anthony S. Weiss
Anthony S. Weiss University of Sydney
Roger K. Prichard
Roger K. Prichard McGill University
Janina McKay-Demeler
Janina McKay-Demeler Freie Universität Berlin
Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna
Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna Freie Universität Berlin
George A. Conder
George A. Conder Pfizer (United States)
Ray M. Kaplan
Ray M. Kaplan St. George's University
Gerald C. Coles
Gerald C. Coles University of Bristol
Andrew C. Kotze
Andrew C. Kotze University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Animal Science and Veterinary fields opens doors to diverse career opportunities that extend beyond traditional veterinary roles. Many professionals explore careers with animals, including wildlife conservation, animal behavior, and zoo management. Online degrees provide flexible options for gaining the necessary knowledge to excel in these paths.

For those interested in health and wellness, pursuing an exercise science degree online complements animal care careers, especially in rehabilitative sciences or performance optimization for animals and humans alike. This blend of expertise can broaden professional roles significantly.

Moreover, leadership roles in related fields, such as becoming an athletic director, offer competitive career paths in sports and animal health sectors. Understanding the role and benefits of an athletic director salary and career trajectory provides insight for those considering administrative or managerial positions aligned with animal and human fitness.

For individuals focusing on behavioral science, accredited programs like the bcaba accredited programs offer the credentials needed for specialized roles in applied behavior analysis. These programs can be pursued online, offering flexibility for working professionals looking to expand their qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas C. Sangster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles