World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
19005
World Ranking
16929
National Ranking
714

Jean Dénarié publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Dénarié sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 94 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jean Dénarié D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Dénarié sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Jean Dénarié is affiliated with INRAE, the Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement in France. This institution is focused on research in agriculture, food, and environmental sciences, indicating that their work is positioned at the intersection of these critical areas.

The scientist has been recognized by prominent organizations in the European scientific community. In 2001, they became a member of Academia Europaea, an organization aimed at promoting learning, education, and research. They also hold membership in the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), which reflects an engagement with molecular biology at the European level.

Although there is no specific publication record detailed here, the affiliations and awards suggest involvement in significant scientific research relevant to molecular biology, agriculture, and environmental studies. Their work likely intersects these domains, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.

Best Publications

  • Symbiotic host-specificity of Rhizobium meliloti is determined by a sulphated and acylated glucosamine oligosaccharide signal.

    Patrice Lerouge;Philippe Roche;Catherine Faucher;Fabienne Maillet

  • The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses

    Nevin D Young;Frédéric Debellé;Frédéric Debellé;Giles E D Oldroyd;Rene Geurts

  • Rhizobium Lipo-Chitooligosaccharide Nodulation Factors: Signaling Molecules Mediating Recognition and Morphogenesis

    Jean Dénarié;Frédéric Debellé;Jean-Claude Promé

  • Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza

    Fabienne Maillet;Véréna Poinsot;Olivier André;Virginie Puech-Pagès;Virginie Puech-Pagès

  • A putative Ca2+ and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase required for bacterial and fungal symbioses.

    Julien Lévy;Cécile Bres;René Geurts;Boulos Chalhoub

  • Four Genes of Medicago truncatula Controlling Components of a Nod Factor Transduction Pathway

    Romy Catoira;Christine Galera;Francoise de Billy;R. Varma Penmetsa

  • Sulphated lipo-oligosaccharide signals of Rhizobium meliloti elicit root nodule organogenesis in alfalfa

    Georges Truchet;Philippe Roche;Patrice Lerouge;Jacques Vasse

  • Medicago truncatula DMI1 Required for Bacterial and Fungal Symbioses in Legumes

    Jean Michel Ané;Jean Michel Ané;György B. Kiss;György B. Kiss;Brendan K. Riely;R. Varma Penmetsa

  • The Medicago truncatula lysine motif-receptor-like kinase gene family includes NFP and new nodule-expressed genes.

    Jean-François Arrighi;Annick Barre;Besma Ben Amor;Anne Bersoult

  • Molecular basis of symbiotic host specificity in rhizobium meliloti: nodH and nodPQ genes encode the sulfation of lipo-oligosaccharide signals

    Philippe Roche;Frédéric Debellé;Fabienne Maillet;Patrice Lerouge

  • Rhizobium meliloti lipooligosaccharide nodulation factors: different structural requirements for bacterial entry into target root hair cells and induction of plant symbiotic developmental responses.

    M Ardourel;N Demont;F Debellé;F Maillet

  • Medicago truncatula, a model plant for studying the molecular genetics of the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis.

    David G. Barker;Sylvie Bianchi;François Blondon;Yvette Dattée

  • A diffusible factor from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induces symbiosis-specific MtENOD11 expression in roots of Medicago truncatula.

    Sonja Kosuta;Mireille Chabaud;Géraldine Lougnon;Clare Gough

  • The NFP locus of Medicago truncatula controls an early step of Nod factor signal transduction upstream of a rapid calcium flux and root hair deformation

    Besma Ben Amor;Sidney L. Shaw;Giles E. D. Oldroyd;Fabienne Maillet

  • Genes controlling early and late functions in symbiosis are located on a megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti

    Charles Rosenberg;Pierre Boistard;Jean Dénarié;Francine Casse-Delbart

  • Nod factors and a diffusible factor from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate lateral root formation in Medicago truncatula via the DMI1/DMI2 signalling pathway.

    Boglárka Oláh;Christian Brière;Guillaume Bécard;Jean Dénarié

  • Lipo-oligosaccharide nodulation factors: A new class of signaling molecules mediating recognition and morphogenesis

    Jean Dénarié;Julie Cullimore

  • SIGNALING AND HOST RANGE VARIATION IN NODULATION

    Jean Dénarié;Frédéric Debellé;Charles Rosenberg

  • Genetic analysis of calcium spiking responses in nodulation mutants of Medicago truncatula

    Rebecca J. Wais;Christine Galera;Giles Oldroyd;Romy Catoira

  • Broad-host-range Rhizobium species strain NGR234 secretes a family of carbamoylated, and fucosylated, nodulation signals that are O-acetylated or sulphated

    Neil Philip John Price;Biserka Relic;F. Talmont;Astrid Lewin

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrice Lerouge
Patrice Lerouge University of Rouen
Douglas R. Cook
Douglas R. Cook University of California, Davis
Giles E. D. Oldroyd
Giles E. D. Oldroyd University of Cambridge
Guillaume Bécard
Guillaume Bécard Paul Sabatier University
David G. Barker
David G. Barker Paul Sabatier University
Ton Bisseling
Ton Bisseling Wageningen University & Research
William J. Broughton
William J. Broughton University of Geneva
Sharon R. Long
Sharon R. Long Stanford University
Edward C. Cocking
Edward C. Cocking University of Nottingham
Jean-Michel Ané
Jean-Michel Ané University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean Dénarié

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles