World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
20870
World Ranking
2554
National Ranking
1025

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
61
Citations
20189
World Ranking
1131
National Ranking
307

David G. Williams publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 165 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

David G. Williams D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For contributions to the study of gamma rays from extragalactic sources such as gammaray bursts and blazars, for using gammaray data to test cosmological models of the extragalactic background light, and for leadership in the development of past, present, and future groundbased gammaray telescopes
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

David G. Williams is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics within environmental science, agricultural and biological sciences, and earth and planetary sciences. The scientist's work covers multiple subfields, including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, plant science, water science and technology, and nature and landscape conservation.

The main topics of study in David G. Williams's research include plant water relations and carbon dynamics, hydrology and watershed management studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant responses to elevated CO2, botanical research and applications, tree-ring climate responses, and geology and paleoclimatology research.

Frequent coauthors in their publications are Jason J. Mercer, Kevin R. Hultine, B. E. Ewers, Shannon E. Albeke, and William H. Bowers.

Their recent papers cover a range of subjects and publication venues:

  • A combination of soil water extraction methods quantifies the isotopic mixing of waters held at separate tensions in soil, 2020, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Global change impacts on cacti (Cactaceae): current threats, challenges and conservation solutions, 2023, Annals of Botany
  • Hydraulic and photosynthetic limitations prevail over root non-structural carbohydrate reserves as drivers of resprouting in two Mediterranean oaks, 2020, Plant Cell & Environment
  • Stable isotopes of water and specific conductance reveal complimentary information on streamflow generation in snowmelt-dominated, seasonally arid watersheds, 2021, Journal of Hydrology
  • Soil N enrichment mediates carbon allocation through respiration in a dominant grass during drought, 2022, Functional Ecology

David G. Williams frequently publishes in venues such as Annals of Botany, Hydrology and earth system sciences, Plant Cell & Environment, Journal of Hydrology, and Functional Ecology.

They have received recognition as a Fellow of the American Physical Society (2019) for contributions related to gamma rays from extragalactic sources and for leadership in gamma-ray telescope development. Additionally, they are a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?

    Nate G. McDowell;William T. Pockman;Craig D. Allen;David D. Breshears

  • Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency

    Travis E. Huxman;Melinda D. Smith;Melinda D. Smith;Philip A. Fay;Alan K. Knapp

  • Assessing the Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Potential Changes in Precipitation

    Jake F. Weltzin;Michael E. Loik;Susanne Schwinning;David G. Williams

  • Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques

    D.G. Williams;W. Cable;K. Hultine;J.C.B. Hoedjes

  • C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland.

    Jack A. Morgan;Daniel R. LeCain;Elise Pendall;Dana M. Blumenthal

  • Hydrogen isotope fractionation during water uptake by woody xerophytes

    Patrick Z. Ellsworth;David G. Williams

  • Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses.

    Lucas A. Cernusak;Guillaume Tcherkez;Claudia Keitel;William K. Cornwell

  • African Grass Invasion in the Americas: Ecosystem Consequences and the Role of Ecophysiology

    David G. Williams;Zdravko Baruch

  • Intra- and interspecific variation for summer precipitation use in pinyon-juniper woodlands

    David G. Williams;James R. Ehleringer

  • Water sources used by riparian trees varies among stream types on the San Pedro River, Arizona.

    Keirith A Snyder;David G Williams

  • Genetic engineering of taxol biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    JingHong M. DeJong;Yule Liu;Arthur P. Bollon;Robert M. Long

  • Partitioning overstory and understory evapotranspiration in a semiarid savanna woodland from the isotopic composition of water vapor

    Enrico A. Yepez;David G. Williams;Russell L. Scott;Guanghui Lin

  • Ecophysiology of Introduced Pennisetum Setaceum on Hawaii: The Role of Phenotypic Plasticity

    David G. Williams;David G. Williams;Richard N. Mack;R. Alan Black

  • Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture

    Travis E. Huxman;Jessica M. Cable;Danielle D. Ignace;J. Alex Eilts

  • Ecohydrological impacts of woody‐plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment

    Russell L. Scott;Travis E. Huxman;David G. Williams;David C. Goodrich

  • Climate change alters stoichiometry of phosphorus and nitrogen in a semiarid grassland

    Feike A. Dijkstra;Elise Pendall;Jack A. Morgan;Dana M. Blumenthal

  • Soil Texture Drives Responses of Soil Respiration to Precipitation Pulses in the Sonoran Desert: Implications for Climate Change

    Jessica M. Cable;Kiona Ogle;David G. Williams;Jake F. Weltzin

  • Limits to water transport in Juniperus osteosperma and Pinus edulis: implications for drought tolerance and regulation of transpiration

    M. J. Linton;J. S. Sperry;D. G. Williams

  • Antecedent moisture and seasonal precipitation influence the response of canopy‐scale carbon and water exchange to rainfall pulses in a semi‐arid grassland

    D. L. Potts;D. L. Potts;T. E. Huxman;J. M. Cable;N. B. English

  • Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved Sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought

    G. W. Wall;T. J. Brooks;N. R. Adam;A. B. Cousins

  • Hydraulic redistribution by a dominant, warm‐desert phreatophyte: seasonal patterns and response to precipitation pulses

    K. R. Hultine;R. L. Scott;W. L. Cable;D. C. Goodrich

  • Dynamics of transpiration and evaporation following a moisture pulse in semiarid grassland: A chamber-based isotope method for partitioning flux components

    Enrico A. Yepez;Travis E. Huxman;Danielle D. Ignace;Nathan B. English

  • Transpiration of cottonwood/willow forest estimated from sap flux

    Sean M. Schaeffer;Sean M. Schaeffer;David G. Williams;David C. Goodrich

  • Seasonal estimates of riparian evapotranspiration using remote and in situ measurements.

    D.C Goodrich;R Scott;J Qi;B Goff

  • Controls on transpiration in a semiarid riparian cottonwood forest

    Rico M. Gazal;Russell L. Scott;David C. Goodrich;David G. Williams

  • Ecohydrology of Water-Controlled Ecosystems: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics

    David G. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Elise Pendall
Elise Pendall Western Sydney University
Travis E. Huxman
Travis E. Huxman University of California, Irvine
Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Jack A. Morgan
Jack A. Morgan Agricultural Research Service
Kevin R. Hultine
Kevin R. Hultine Desert Botanical Garden
Jake F. Weltzin
Jake F. Weltzin United States Geological Survey
David L. Dettman
David L. Dettman University of Arizona
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture
Feike A. Dijkstra
Feike A. Dijkstra University of Sydney
Dana M. Blumenthal
Dana M. Blumenthal Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David G. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles