World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas F. E. Barth

Thomas F. E. Barth

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
64
Citations
14310
World Ranking
1745
National Ranking
122

Thomas F. E. Barth publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 256 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Thomas F. E. Barth D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A Biologic Definition of Burkitt's Lymphoma from Transcriptional and Genomic Profiling

    Michael Hummel;Stefan Bentink;Hilmar Berger;Wolfram Klapper

  • T-lymphocyte infiltration in visceral adipose tissue: a primary event in adipose tissue inflammation and the development of obesity-mediated insulin resistance.

    Ulrich Kintscher;Martin Hartge;Katharina Hess;Anna Foryst-Ludwig

  • MYC status in concert with BCL2 and BCL6 expression predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Heike Horn;Marita Ziepert;Claudia Becher;Thomas F. E. Barth

  • SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas.

    Janis A Müller;Rüdiger Groß;Carina Conzelmann;Jana Krüger

  • MYC stimulates EZH2 expression by repression of its negative regulator miR-26a.

    Sandrine Sander;Lars Bullinger;Kay Klapproth;Katja Fiedler

  • Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by recurrent copy number gains of the short arm of chromosome 2.

    Stefan Joos;Christiane K. Menz;Gunnar Wrobel;Reiner Siebert

  • Reticular dysgenesis (aleukocytosis) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding mitochondrial adenylate kinase 2

    Ulrich Pannicke;Manfred Hönig;Manfred Hönig;Isabell Hess;Claudia Friesen

  • Gains of 2p involving the REL locus correlate with nuclear c-Rel protein accumulation in neoplastic cells of classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Thomas F.E. Barth;José I. Martin-Subero;Stefan Joos;Christiane K. Menz

  • Rapid onset of apoptosis in vitro follows disruption of beta 1-integrin/matrix interactions in human colonic crypt cells.

    J. Sträter;U. Wedding;T. F. E. Barth;K. Koretz

  • Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines are characterized by frequent aberrations on chromosomes 2p and 9p including REL and JAK2

    Stefan Joos;Martin Granzow;Heidi Holtgreve-Grez;Reiner Siebert

  • Gain of chromosome arm 9p is characteristic of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (MBL): comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis and presentation of a novel MBL cell line.

    Martin Bentz;Thomas F.E. Barth;Silke Brüderlein;Daliah Bock

  • t(11;14)-positive mantle cell lymphomas exhibit complex karyotypes and share similarities with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Martin Bentz;Anja Plesch;Lars Bullinger;Stephan Stilgenbauer

  • VH mutation status and VDJ rearrangement structure in mantle cell lymphoma: correlation with genomic aberrations, clinical characteristics, and outcome.

    Dirk Kienle;Dirk Kienle;Alexander Kröber;Alexander Kröber;Tiemo Katzenberger;Tiemo Katzenberger;German Ott;German Ott

  • Mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma: where do we stand?

    Thomas F E Barth;Frank Leithäuser;Stefan Joos;Martin Bentz

  • Genomic DNA-chip hybridization in t(11;14)-positive mantle cell lymphomas shows a high frequency of aberrations and allows a refined characterization of consensus regions.

    Holger Kohlhammer;Carsten Schwaenen;Swen Wessendorf;Karlheinz Holzmann

  • High incidence of chromosomal imbalances and gene amplifications in the classical follicular variant of follicle center lymphoma

    Martin Bentz;Claudius A. Werner;Hartmut Dohner;Stefan Joos

  • Hidden gene amplifications in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.

    Swen Wessendorf;Carsten Schwaenen;Holger Kohlhammer;Dirk Kienle

  • Characteristic Pattern of Chromosomal Gains and Losses in Primary Large B-Cell Lymphomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract

    Thomas F.E. Barth;Hartmut Döhner;Claudius A. Werner;Stephan Stilgenbauer

  • Clinicopathologic Correlations of Genomic Gains and Losses in Follicular Lymphoma

    Andreas Viardot;Peter Möller;Josef Högel;Kirsten Werner

  • GSE12278: MYC stimulates EZH2 expression by repression of its negative regulator miR-26a.

    Lars Bullinger;Sandrine Sander;Kay Klapproth;Katja Fiedler

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Möller
Peter Möller University of Ulm
Hartmut Döhner
Hartmut Döhner University of Ulm
Klaus-Michael Debatin
Klaus-Michael Debatin University of Ulm
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm
Peter Lichter
Peter Lichter German Cancer Research Center
Stephan Stilgenbauer
Stephan Stilgenbauer University of Ulm
Andreas Rosenwald
Andreas Rosenwald University of Würzburg
Wolfram Klapper
Wolfram Klapper Kiel University
Harald Stein
Harald Stein Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens the door to varied career options, and many related fields can be pursued flexibly through online study. For those interested in the intersection of biology and mental health, a masters degree in counseling online can lead to rewarding roles assisting individuals and communities. Such programs are ideal for blending scientific knowledge with clinical skills.

If your interests lie in applying biology to legal or investigative contexts, you may be curious about what can you do with a masters in forensic psychology. This path combines molecular research with the study of behavior and law.

For those passionate about developmental sciences, child psychology masters programs offer the chance to specialize in youth mental health and behavior. These programs can complement a background in Molecular Biology, especially when working in pediatric research or healthcare.

Moreover, online masters degrees in counseling provide flexible and affordable pathways to credentials in the mental health sector—ideal for science graduates looking to make a direct impact.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. E. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles