World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
34289
World Ranking
9290
National Ranking
366

Jane Stewart publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Stewart sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 249 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jane Stewart D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Stewart sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jane Stewart is a researcher affiliated with Concordia University in Canada. Their work spans several interdisciplinary fields, particularly focusing on immunology, plant science, obstetrics and gynecology, and gender studies. Their research engages with themes related to ecology and conservation studies, biosimilars and bioanalytical methods, reproductive system and pregnancy, pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, and demographic trends and gender preferences.

Stewart has contributed to multiple scientific papers, including several published in the journal Birth Defects Research. Some of the notable paper titles include:

  • Issue Information (2021, Birth Defects Research)
  • Issue Information (2021, Birth Defects Research)
  • Issue Information (2020, Birth Defects Research)
  • Issue Information (2020, Birth Defects Research)
  • Issue Information (2021, Birth Defects Research)

The frequent collaborators in Stewart's publications reflect a network of researchers involved in related studies. These coauthors include Kristin Artinger, Michel Vekemans, Christina Chambers, San Diego, and John Wiley.

Stewart's published works appear regularly in several academic venues. The primary publication outlets include:

  • Birth Defects Research
  • Forest Pathology
  • Toxicology Research
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Their research engages with subfields that include immunology and plant science, as well as medical and gender studies topics. This multidisciplinary approach supports their investigations into both biological and social dimensions of health and environmental science.

Recognition of Stewart's career includes being awarded Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1996 under the Academy of Science and Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1986.

Best Publications

  • Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity

    Peter W. Kalivas;Jane Stewart

  • The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings.

    Yavin Shaham;Uri Shalev;Lin Lu;Harriet de Wit

  • Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants.

    Jane Stewart;Harriet de Wit;Roelof Eikelboom

  • Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat

    Harriet de Wit;Jane Stewart

  • Stress-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking in rats: a review.

    Yavin Shaham;Suzanne Erb;Jane Stewart

  • Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstatement procedure.

    David H. Epstein;David H. Epstein;Kenzie L. Preston;Jane Stewart;Yavin Shaham

  • Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co-use

    Francesco Leri;Julie Bruneau;Jane Stewart

  • Conditioning of drug-induced physiological responses.

    Roelof Eikelboom;Jane Stewart

  • Stress reinstates cocaine-seeking behavior after prolonged extinction and a drug-free period.

    Suzanne Erb;Y. Shaham;J. Stewart

  • Pathways to relapse: the neurobiology of drug- and stress-induced relapse to drug-taking.

    Jane Stewart

  • A role for the prefrontal cortex in stress- and cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats

    Nancy Capriles;Nancy Capriles;Demetra Rodaros;Robert E. Sorge;Jane Stewart

  • Stress reinstates heroin-seeking in drug-free animals: An effect mimicking heroin, not withdrawal

    Y. Shaham;J. Stewart

  • A descriptive study of social development in the rat (Rattus norvegicus)

    Michael J. Meaney;Jane Stewart

  • A Role for the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis, But Not the Amygdala, in the Effects of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor on Stress-Induced Reinstatement of Cocaine Seeking

    Suzanne Erb;Jane Stewart

  • The Role of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Corticosterone in Stress- and Cocaine-Induced Relapse to Cocaine Seeking in Rats

    Suzanne Erb;Yavin Shaham;Jane Stewart

  • Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference: reinstatement by priming injections of cocaine after extinction.

    Devin Mueller;Jane Stewart

  • The role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens in analgesia

    Nadège Altier;Jane Stewart

  • Corticotropin-Releasing Factor, But Not Corticosterone, Is Involved in Stress-Induced Relapse to Heroin-Seeking in Rats

    Yavin Shaham;Douglas Funk;Suzanne Erb;Theodore J. Brown

  • CP-154,526, a selective, non-peptide antagonist of the corticotropin-releasing factor1 receptor attenuates stress-induced relapse to drug seeking in cocaine- and heroin-trained rats.

    Y. Shaham;Suzanne Erb;Shirley Leung;Yvona Buczek

  • Amphetamine administered to the ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens sensitizes rats to systemic morphine: lack of conditioned effects.

    Paul Vezina;Jane Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Shimon Amir
Shimon Amir Concordia University
Yavin Shaham
Yavin Shaham National Institute on Drug Abuse
Paul Vezina
Paul Vezina University of Chicago
Michael J. Meaney
Michael J. Meaney McGill University
Cecilia Flores
Cecilia Flores McGill University
Aldert H. Piersma
Aldert H. Piersma Centre for Health Protection
Mark D. Kilby
Mark D. Kilby University of Birmingham
Tin-Chiu Li
Tin-Chiu Li Chinese University of Hong Kong
Robert McFarland
Robert McFarland Newcastle University
Douglass M. Turnbull
Douglass M. Turnbull Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path. Today, aspiring healthcare professionals have access to numerous online programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and quality education. These programs can be an ideal alternative or complement to in-person medical study, especially for working adults.

For prospective nurse practitioners, choosing from the cheapest nurse practitioner programs can help minimize student debt while opening doors to advanced clinical roles. Those starting out in nursing may wonder what is the cheapest online college for nursing? Choosing an affordable, accredited institution can fast-track entry into the nursing profession.

For nurses aiming for career advancement, earning an online nursing doctorate can pave the way to leadership, teaching, and research positions. Alternatively, registered nurses with an associate degree can increase their opportunities by enrolling in the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs.

Exploring these related online degrees and pathways can help you decide the right direction for your medical career journey—offering flexibility, affordability, and new opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Stewart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles