World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
21331
World Ranking
7960
National Ranking
183

Ueli Gubler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ueli Gubler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ueli Gubler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ueli Gubler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ueli Gubler is affiliated with Roche (Switzerland) and has a research portfolio spanning biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work intersects multiple subfields including molecular biology, infectious diseases, parasitology, epidemiology, and organic chemistry.

The scientist's research topics cover diverse areas such as parasitic diseases research and treatment, parasites and host interactions, Trypanosoma species research and implications, advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques, DNA and nucleic acid chemistry, RNA interference and gene delivery, and synthesis and reactivity of heterocycles.

Ueli Gubler has contributed to several scientific publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from the filarial nematode W. bancrofti in complex with NADPH and folate, 2023, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • A beginners guide to SELEX and DNA aptamers, 2025, Analytical Biochemistry
  • A Novel Strategy for Identifying Non-covalent KRas Inhibitors, 2020, Medical Research Archives
  • Mutational analysis confirms the presence of distal inhibitor-selectivity determining residues in B. stearothermophilus dihydrofolate reductase, 2020, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Frequent coauthors in their research include Nina M. Goodey, Tyler Eck, Cheryl A. Janson, Keith Lange, and Kathleen M. Frey, with multiple collaborations documented.

The scientist's frequent publication venues reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research, featuring journals such as PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Analytical Biochemistry, Medical Research Archives, and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Best Publications

  • A simple and very efficient method for generating cDNA libraries

    Ueli Gubler;Beth J. Hoffman

  • THE INTERLEUKIN-12/INTERLEUKIN-12-RECEPTOR SYSTEM: Role in Normal and Pathologic Immune Responses

    Maurice K. Gately;Louis M. Renzetti;Jeanne Magram;Alvin S. Stern

  • Regulation of the interleukin (IL)-12R beta 2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells.

    Susanne J. Szabo;Anand S. Dighe;Ueli Gubler;Kenneth M. Murphy

  • Cloning and expression of murine interleukin-1 cDNA in Escherichia coli

    Peter T. Lomedico;Ueli Gubler;Christopher P. Hellmann;Mitchell Dukovich

  • Selective Expression of an Interleukin-12 Receptor Component by Human T Helper 1 Cells

    Lars Rogge;Luisella Barberis-Maino;Mauro Biffi;Nadia Passini

  • A functional interleukin 12 receptor complex is composed of two β-type cytokine receptor subunits

    David H. Presky;Hong Yang;Lisa J. Minetti;Anne O. Chua

  • Coexpression of two distinct genes is required to generate secreted bioactive cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor

    U Gubler;A O Chua;D S Schoenhaut;C M Dwyer

  • Molecular cloning establishes proenkephalin as precursor of enkephalin-containing peptides

    U. Gubler;Peter H. Seeburg;B. J. Hoffman;L. P. Gage

  • Cloning and expression of murine IL-12.

    D S Schoenhaut;A O Chua;A G Wolitzky;P M Quinn

  • Regulation of human lymphocyte proliferation by a heterodimeric cytokine, IL-12 (cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor).

    M K Gately;B B Desai;A G Wolitzky;P M Quinn

  • Mouse interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) p40 homodimer: a potent IL‐12 antagonist

    Silke Gillessen;Daisy Carvajal;Ping Ling;Frank J. Podlaski

  • Human IL-12 p40 homodimer binds to the IL-12 receptor but does not mediate biologic activity.

    Ping Ling;M. K. Gately;U. Gubler;A. S. Stern

  • Human keratinocytes contain mRNA indistinguishable from monocyte interleukin 1 alpha and beta mRNA. Keratinocyte epidermal cell-derived thymocyte-activating factor is identical to interleukin 1.

    T S Kupper;D W Ballard;A O Chua;J S McGuire

  • Interleukin 1 gene expression in cultured human keratinocytes is augmented by ultraviolet irradiation

    T S Kupper;A O Chua;P Flood;J McGuire

  • Fibroblasts genetically engineered to secrete interleukin 12 can suppress tumor growth and induce antitumor immunity to a murine melanoma in vivo.

    Hideaki Tahara;Herbert J. Zeh;Walter J. Storkus;Itzhak Pappo

  • Two high-affinity interleukin 1 receptors represent separate gene products.

    Richard Chizzonite;Terri Truitt;Patricia L. Kilian;Alvin S. Stern

  • TWO HUMAN TNF RECEPTORS HAVE SIMILAR EXTRACELLULAR, BUT DISTINCT INTRACELLULAR, DOMAIN SEQUENCES

    Zlatko Dembic;Hansruedi Loetscher;Ueli Gubler;Yu-Ching E. Pan

  • Effective eradication of established murine tumors with IL-12 gene therapy using a polycistronic retroviral vector.

    H. Tahara;L. Zitvogel;W. J. Storkus;H. J. Zeh

  • Recombinant human interleukin 1 alpha: purification and biological characterization.

    U Gubler;A O Chua;A S Stern;C P Hellmann

  • Interleukin 1 alpha and interleukin 1 beta bind to the same receptor on T cells.

    P L Kilian;K L Kaffka;A S Stern;D Woehle

  • Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for the precursor of human growth hormone-releasing factor, somatocrinin

    U Gubler;J J Monahan;P T Lomedico;R S Bhatt

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurice K. Gately
Maurice K. Gately Roche (Switzerland)
Zlatko Dembic
Zlatko Dembic University of Oslo
Kenneth M. Murphy
Kenneth M. Murphy Washington University in St. Louis
Silke Gillessen
Silke Gillessen Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Manfred Brockhaus
Manfred Brockhaus Roche (Switzerland)
Thomas S. Kupper
Thomas S. Kupper Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul D. Robbins
Paul D. Robbins University of Minnesota
Peter Bohlen
Peter Bohlen Eli Lilly (United States)
Sidney Udenfriend
Sidney Udenfriend Roche Institute of Molecular Biology
Reiner L. Gentz
Reiner L. Gentz Gentz Biopharmaceutical Consulting

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads to diverse career options and academic routes. Many students consider online pathways for greater flexibility and faster completion. If your interest expands beyond a pure research focus, clinical practice is another rewarding direction. An online psyd program can open doors to advanced roles in counseling and mental health, offering specializations that complement neuroscience expertise.

For those interested in therapy, marriage and family therapy online programs allow graduates to support individuals and families through evidence-based approaches, with streamlined pathways to licensure. If you’re aiming to earn your degree quickly, an accelerated online bachelor’s degree is a popular choice, enabling faster entry into the workforce or graduate school.

Lastly, when deciding your academic direction, reviewing the top degrees in the world can help you align your neuroscience interest with high-paying, in-demand fields for long-term career growth. Combining neuroscience with these flexible online programs broadens your options across healthcare, research, and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ueli Gubler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles