World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tomasz Wierzbicki

Tomasz Wierzbicki

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 77 253 229 123 103 268 27595

Tomasz Wierzbicki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tomasz Wierzbicki between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tomasz Wierzbicki published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2024. 34 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2024. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 4 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 4 publications
1966 2025

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tomasz Wierzbicki: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 4
1968 2
1969 0
1970 2
1971 3
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 0
1978 1
1979 3
1980 2
1981 2
1982 2
1983 3
1984 1
1985 2
1986 5
1987 1
1988 3
1989 5
1990 3
1991 3
1992 6
1993 6
1994 2
1995 3
1996 11
1997 5
1998 5
1999 8
2000 5
2001 6
2002 4
2003 7
2004 11
2005 10
2006 5
2007 7
2008 12
2009 10
2010 12
2011 6
2012 4
2013 4
2014 10
2015 14
2016 10
2017 3
2018 8
2019 5
2020 7
2021 8
2022 2
2023 7
2024 30
2025 4
Total 310
Download as CSV

Tomasz Wierzbicki publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Wierzbicki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 267–276 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 268 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88 268
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Tomasz Wierzbicki D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Wierzbicki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8 77
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Tomasz Wierzbicki is affiliated with MIT in the United States and primarily works within the field of Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields including Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, and Automotive Engineering.

The scientist has contributed to research topics such as:

  • Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Metallurgy and Material Forming
  • Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Wierzbicki's recent publications illustrate a focus on battery technology and mechanical behavior of materials. Notable papers include:

  • "End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries," 2021, Cell Reports Physical Science
  • "Mechanical Deformation of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells under In-Plane Loads-Part I: Experimental Investigation," 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • "Large-deformation plasticity and fracture behavior of pure lithium under various stress states," 2021, Acta Materialia
  • "Mechanical Deformation of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells under in-plane Loads-Part II: Computational Modeling," 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • "Effect of receptors on the resonant and transient harmonic vibrations of Coronavirus," 2021, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

Frequent collaborators in Wierzbicki's research include:

  • Wei Li
  • Juner Zhu
  • Mariusz Żółtowski
  • Eugeniusz Koda
  • Tobias Sedlatschek

The venues where Wierzbicki publishes frequently encompass:

  • Applied Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • International Journal of Impact Engineering
  • Materials

The scope of Wierzbicki's work highlights the intersection of material science and engineering disciplines, addressing both mechanical properties and durability concerns, often with applications in battery technology and infrastructure.

Best Publications

  • On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space

    Yingbin Bao;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence

    Yuanli Bai;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture

    Yuanli Bai;Yuanli Bai;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures

    T. Wierzbicki;W. Abramowicz

  • Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models

    Tomasz Wierzbicki;Yingbin Bao;Young-Woong Lee;Yuanli Bai

  • Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections

    Sigit P Santosa;Tomasz Wierzbicki;Arve G Hanssen;Magnus Langseth

  • Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs

    Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foam-filled thin-walled structures in energy absorption

    Weigang Chen;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Axial Crushing of Multicorner Sheet Metal Columns

    W. Abramowicz;T. Wierzbicki

  • A Comparative Study on Various Ductile Crack Formation Criteria

    Yingbin Bao;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture

    Yingbin Bao;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • A review of safety-focused mechanical modeling of commercial lithium-ion batteries

    Juner Zhu;Tomasz Wierzbicki;Wei Li

  • Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam

    S. Santosa;T. Wierzbicki

  • Calibration and finite element simulation of pouch lithium-ion batteries for mechanical integrity

    Elham Sahraei;Rich Hill;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Alexander revisited—A two folding elements model of progressive crushing of tubes

    T. Wierzbicki;S.U. Bhat;W. Abramowicz;D. Brodkin

  • Modeling and short circuit detection of 18650 Li-ion cells under mechanical abuse conditions

    Elham Sahraei;John Campbell;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Ductile fracture initiation and propagation modeling using damage plasticity theory

    Liang Xue;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Characterizing and modeling mechanical properties and onset of short circuit for three types of lithium-ion pouch cells

    Elham Sahraei;Joseph Meier;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Evaluation of six fracture models in high velocity perforation

    X. Teng;T. Wierzbicki

  • Structural Crashworthiness and Failure

    Norman Jones;Tomasz Wierzbicki

  • Energy absorption of structures and materials: Guoxing Lu and Tongxi Yu

    T Wierzbicki

Frequent Co-Authors

Junhe Lian
Junhe Lian RWTH Aachen University
Xiaowei Zhang
Xiaowei Zhang Nanjing University
Dirk Mohr
Dirk Mohr ETH Zurich
Norman Jones
Norman Jones University of Liverpool
Anthony R. Ingraffea
Anthony R. Ingraffea Cornell University
Francesco Migliavacca
Francesco Migliavacca Polytechnic University of Milan
Brad L. Boyce
Brad L. Boyce Sandia National Laboratories
John Banhart
John Banhart Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Jacques Besson
Jacques Besson Mines ParisTech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Understanding different educational paths is crucial, as the field often intersects with disciplines requiring specialized knowledge.

Similar to how different types of therapist degrees cater to specific career goals, engineering students should consider programs that align with their interests, such as materials science, robotics, or systems engineering.

Many learners seek flexible options, making easy counseling degree programs online appealing for balancing studies with other commitments. While the engineering curriculum may be more technical, understanding how online programs are structured can help students manage their workload effectively.

Accelerated pathways, like the online applied behavior analysis degree accelerated, demonstrate that fast-track options exist in many fields. Students considering advanced engineering degrees can benefit from researching institutions that offer expedited master's programs.

Lastly, admission competitiveness varies by specialization, evident in challenges like how hard it is to get into slp grad school. Prospective engineering students should prepare thoroughly for admissions and tailor their applications to enhance acceptance chances into competitive programs.

Best Scientists Citing Tomasz Wierzbicki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles