World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
59
Citations
10450
World Ranking
7492
National Ranking
1853

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
58
Citations
10354
World Ranking
2553
National Ranking
780

Brad L. Boyce publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad L. Boyce sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 352 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Brad L. Boyce D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad L. Boyce sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brad L. Boyce is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research primarily spans across the fields of Engineering and Materials Science, with particular emphasis on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

Their work explores several main topics, including:

  • Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Ion-surface interactions and analysis
  • Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science

Notable recent publications by Boyce include:

  • "Review of Multifunctional Separators: Stabilizing the Cathode and the Anode for Alkali (Li, Na, and K) Metal-Sulfur and Selenium Batteries," 2022, Chemical Reviews
  • "Void nucleation during ductile rupture of metals: A review," 2023, Progress in Materials Science
  • "Size-dependent stochastic tensile properties in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel," 2020, Additive Manufacturing
  • "Multi-morphology lattices lead to improved plastic energy absorption," 2020, Materials & Design
  • "Pragmatic generative optimization of novel structural lattice metamaterials with machine learning," 2021, Materials & Design

The venues where Boyce frequently publishes include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Materials & Design
  • Acta Materialia
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • JOM

Boyce has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, such as:

  • Khalid Hattar
  • Rémi Dingreville
  • David P. Adams
  • Philip Noell
  • Anthony Garland

Best Publications

  • Slip planes in bcc transition metals

    Christopher Robert Weinberger;Brad Lee Boyce;Corbett Chandler Battaile

  • Review of Multifunctional Separators: Stabilizing the Cathode and the Anode for Alkali (Li, Na, and K) Metal-Sulfur and Selenium Batteries.

    Unknown

  • Influence of microstructure on high-cycle fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V: Bimodal vs. lamellar structures

    R. K. Nalla;R. O. Ritchie;B. L. Boyce;J. P. Campbell

  • Effect of load ratio and maximum stress intensity on the fatigue threshold in Ti–6Al–4V

    B.L. Boyce;R.O. Ritchie

  • Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions

    Brad L. Boyce;J. Mark Grazier;Reese E. Jones;Thao D. Nguyen

  • A Review of Fatigue Behavior in Nanocrystalline Metals

    H. A. Padilla;B. L. Boyce

  • The mechanisms of ductile rupture

    Philip J. Noell;Jay D. Carroll;Brad L. Boyce

  • Additive manufacturing: Toward holistic design

    Bradley H. Jared;Miguel A. Aguilo;Lauren L. Beghini;Brad L. Boyce

  • Thresholds for high-cycle fatigue in a turbine engine Ti–6Al–4V alloy

    R.O Ritchie;B.L Boyce;J.P Campbell;O Roder

  • Grain-scale experimental validation of crystal plasticity finite element simulations of tantalum oligocrystals

    H. Lim;J.D. Carroll;C.C. Battaile;T.E. Buchheit

  • The residual stress state due to a spherical hard-body impact

    B.L. Boyce;X. Chen;J.W. Hutchinson;R.O. Ritchie

  • The dynamic tensile behavior of tough, ultrahigh-strength steels at strain-rates from 0.0002 s−1 to 200 s−1 ☆

    Brad Lee Boyce;Morris F. Dilmore

  • High-throughput stochastic tensile performance of additively manufactured stainless steel

    Bradley C. Salzbrenner;Jeffrey M. Rodelas;Jonathan D. Madison;Bradley Howell Jared

  • Stress-controlled viscoelastic tensile response of bovine cornea

    B.L. Boyce;R.E. Jones;T.D. Nguyen;J.M. Grazier

  • The Sandia Fracture Challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing

    B. L Boyce;S. L B Kramer;H. E Fang;T. E Cordova

  • Rethinking How External Pressure Can Suppress Dendrites in Lithium Metal Batteries

    Xin Zhang;Q. Jane Wang;Katharine L. Harrison;Katherine Jungjohann

  • Void Nucleation During Ductile Rupture of Metals: A Review

    Unknown

  • Fracture strength of micro- and nano-scale silicon components

    Frank W. DelRio;Robert F. Cook;Brad L. Boyce

  • On the application of the Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram to foreign-object damage and high-cycle fatigue

    J.O Peters;B.L Boyce;X Chen;J.M McNaney

  • Achieving Ultralow Wear with Stable Nanocrystalline Metals.

    John F. Curry;Tomas F. Babuska;Timothy A. Furnish;Ping Lu

  • Modeling the anisotropic finite-deformation viscoelastic behavior of soft fiber-reinforced composites

    T.D. Nguyen;R.E. Jones;B.L. Boyce

  • A Nonlinear Anisotropic Viscoelastic Model for the Tensile Behavior of the Corneal Stroma

    T. D. Nguyen;R. E. Jones;B. L. Boyce

  • Strength Distributions in Polycrystalline Silicon MEMS

    B.L. Boyce;J.M. Grazier;T.E. Buchheit;M.J. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Thao D. Nguyen
Thao D. Nguyen Johns Hopkins University
Stephen M. Foiles
Stephen M. Foiles Sandia National Laboratories
Robert O. Ritchie
Robert O. Ritchie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Christopher R. Weinberger
Christopher R. Weinberger Colorado State University
Somuri V. Prasad
Somuri V. Prasad Sandia National Laboratories
Robert F. Cook
Robert F. Cook National Institute of Standards and Technology
John W. Hutchinson
John W. Hutchinson Harvard University
Anthony R. Ingraffea
Anthony R. Ingraffea Cornell University
Ken Gall
Ken Gall Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology studies in the USA opens versatile career options. However, many students also seek complementary online degrees to strengthen their leadership, management, and communication skills for broader career pathways.

For example, a masters in human resources can prepare engineers to manage technical teams or lead HR initiatives within tech-focused companies. An affordable online master's degree in communications is valuable for professionals who need to sharpen their ability to explain complex, technical ideas to diverse audiences.

Aspiring tech entrepreneurs may consider online mba entrepreneurship programs to gain essential business skills for launching products or leading startups. Additionally, if you want to accelerate your path to management, several top online mba programs no gmat now offer flexible admissions and curricula designed for working professionals in technical fields.

These related online degrees can complement your technical background and help you access leadership positions, transition to new roles, or expand your professional network in the dynamic world of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Brad L. Boyce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles