World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 41 1949 1803 56 53 181 5627

Alexis Rusinek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alexis Rusinek between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alexis Rusinek published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 11 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alexis Rusinek: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 7
2008 12
2009 15
2010 10
2011 9
2012 11
2013 8
2014 11
2015 9
2016 6
2017 10
2018 15
2019 6
2020 18
2021 18
2022 4
2023 2
2024 6
2025 5
Total 197
Download as CSV

Alexis Rusinek publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexis Rusinek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 181 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130 181
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Alexis Rusinek D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexis Rusinek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100 41
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Alexis Rusinek is affiliated with the University of Lorraine in France and specializes in engineering and materials science, with a particular focus on materials chemistry and mechanical engineering.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering

They have contributed significantly to topics that intersect material behavior under dynamic conditions and manufacturing innovations. The main topics of their scholarly work include:

  • High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Energetic Materials and Combustion
  • Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
  • Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology

Alexis Rusinek has published numerous papers in various research venues. The most frequent venues include:

  • Materials
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • International Journal of Impact Engineering
  • Materials Today Proceedings
  • Composite Structures

Recent publications by Rusinek document investigations into composite and additive manufacturing materials and structures, with studies on mechanical, electrical, and thermal behaviors as well as structural responses. Selected studies are:

  • Conductive 3D printed PLA composites: On the interplay of mechanical, electrical and thermal behaviours (2021, Composite Structures)
  • Investigations on the Mechanical Response of Gradient Lattice Structures Manufactured via SLM (2020, Metals)
  • Out-of-plane crushing response of aluminum honeycombs in-situ filled with graphene-reinforced polyurethane foam (2020, Composite Structures)
  • Effect of powder bed fusion laser melting process parameters, build orientation and strut thickness on porosity, accuracy and tensile properties of an auxetic structure in IN718 alloy (2020, Additive manufacturing)
  • Simple shear behavior and constitutive modeling of 304 stainless steel over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures (2021, International Journal of Impact Engineering)

Collaboration is a notable part of Rusinek's research profile. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Slim Bahi
  • Paul Wood
  • T. Jankowiak
  • Amine Bendarma
  • Urvashi Gunputh

Best Publications

  • Shear testing of a sheet steel at wide range of strain rates and a constitutive relation with strain-rate and temperature dependence of the flow stress

    A. Rusinek;J.R Klepaczko

  • Experiments on heat generated during plastic deformation and stored energy for TRIP steels

    A. Rusinek;J.R. Klepaczko

  • Mechanical impact behavior of polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK)

    D. Garcia-Gonzalez;A. Rusinek;Tomasz Jankowiak;A. Arias

  • Constitutive relations in 3-D for a wide range of strain rates and temperatures – Application to mild steels

    A. Rusinek;R. Zaera;J.R. Klepaczko

  • Numerical simulations of impact behaviour of thin steel plates subjected to cylindrical, conical and hemispherical non-deformable projectiles

    A. Arias;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez;A. Rusinek

  • A thermo-viscoplastic constitutive model for FCC metals with application to OFHC copper

    A. Rusinek;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez;A. Arias

  • Conductive 3D printed PLA composites: On the interplay of mechanical, electrical and thermal behaviours

    I. Tirado-Garcia;D. Garcia-Gonzalez;S. Garzon-Hernandez;S. Garzon-Hernandez;A. Rusinek;A. Rusinek

  • Investigation of mechanical impact behavior of short carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK composites

    D. Garcia-Gonzalez;M. Rodriguez-Millan;A. Rusinek;A. Arias

  • Experimental and numerical study on the perforation process of mild steel sheets subjected to perpendicular impact by hemispherical projectiles

    A. Rusinek;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez;R. Zaera;J.R. Klepaczko

  • Influence of strain rate, temperature and adiabatic heating on the mechanical behaviour of poly-methyl-methacrylate: Experimental and modelling analyses

    M. Nasraoui;M. Nasraoui;P. Forquin;L. Siad;A. Rusinek

  • Analysis of inertia and scale effects on dynamic neck formation during tension of sheet steel

    A. Rusinek;R. Zaera;J.R. Klepaczko;R. Cheriguene

  • Influence of projectile shape on dynamic behavior of steel sheet subjected to impact and perforation

    K. M. Kpenyigba;Tomasz Jankowiak;Alexis Rusinek;Raphaël Pesci

  • The cohesive element approach to dynamic fragmentation: the question of energy convergence

    Jean-François Molinari;G. Gazonas;R. Raghupathy;A. Rusinek

  • Finite element simulation of steel ring fragmentation under radial expansion

    A. Rusinek;R. Zaera

  • Thermo-viscoplastic constitutive relation for aluminium alloys, modeling of negative strain rate sensitivity and viscous drag effects

    Alexis Rusinek;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez

  • Influence of conical projectile diameter on perpendicular impact of thin steel plate

    A. Rusinek;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez;A. Arias;J.R. Klepaczko

  • A constitutive model for analyzing martensite formation in austenitic steels deforming at high strain rates

    Ramon Zaera;J. A. Rodriguez-Martinez;Ana Maria Casado;José Fernandez-Saez

  • Modelling of thermo-viscoplastic behaviour of DH-36 and Weldox 460-E structural steels at wide ranges of strain rates and temperatures, comparison of constitutive relations for impact problems

    J.R. Klepaczko;A. Rusinek;J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez;R.B. Pęcherski

  • Validation of the Klepaczko–Malinowski model for friction correction and recommendations on Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar

    T. Jankowiak;A. Rusinek;T. Lodygowski

  • Experimental study on the martensitic transformation in AISI 304 steel sheets subjected to tension under wide ranges of strain rate at room temperature

    J. A. Rodriguez-Martinez;Raphaël Pesci;Alexis Rusinek

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramón Zaera
Ramón Zaera Carlos III University of Madrid
George Z. Voyiadjis
George Z. Voyiadjis Louisiana State University
Farid Abed
Farid Abed American University of Sharjah
Alain Molinari
Alain Molinari University of Lorraine
Tomasz Sadowski
Tomasz Sadowski Lublin University of Technology
Joseph E. Shepherd
Joseph E. Shepherd California Institute of Technology
Thierry Grosdidier
Thierry Grosdidier University of Lorraine
Mohamed El Mansori
Mohamed El Mansori Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology
Emanoil Linul
Emanoil Linul Polytechnic University of Timişoara
Wolfgang Bleck
Wolfgang Bleck RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring career paths connected to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, it’s beneficial to consider related online degrees that offer versatile skills. Programs such as the accredited easiest counseling degree programs provide a foundation in human behavior and support, valuable for leadership and team management roles within engineering projects.

Additionally, professionals interested in behavioral sciences may explore the accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online, which can complement technical expertise by focusing on systematic problem-solving and analytics.

When considering careers in speech pathology or therapy, understanding program selection is crucial. Resources such as the slp acceptance rate provide insight into competitive admissions, while knowing the easiest slp programs to get into can guide applicants toward attainable options.

These diverse educational opportunities highlight the importance of multidisciplinary skills and provide flexible pathways for career growth in and around the engineering sector.

Best Scientists Citing Alexis Rusinek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles