World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
41
Citations
7099
World Ranking
3654
National Ranking
919

Lloyd T. Wilson publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd T. Wilson sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 193 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Lloyd T. Wilson D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd T. Wilson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Botany

His main research concerns Agronomy, Botany, Cultivar, Poaceae and Sampling. His Botany study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Horticulture. His Horticulture research includes themes of Weed and Polygonaceae.

His research investigates the link between Cultivar and topics such as Dry weight that cross with problems in Growing season and Host. His work carried out in the field of Poaceae brings together such families of science as Panicle and Field experiment. His Sampling research incorporates themes from Ecology, Larva and Heliothis zea.

His most cited work include:

  • Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. (213 citations)
  • Clumping Patterns of Fruit and Arthropods in Cotton, with Implications for Binomial Sampling (200 citations)
  • Targeting Cultivars onto Rice Growing Environments Using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot Analyses (158 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Agronomy, Botany, PEST analysis, Horticulture and Ecology. In his work, Diatraea saccharalis is strongly intertwined with Crambidae, which is a subfield of Agronomy. Horticulture connects with themes related to Predation in his study.

His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Sampling, Statistics and Zoology. His study looks at the relationship between Integrated pest management and topics such as Agroforestry, which overlap with Pest control. His Cultivar study combines topics in areas such as Panicle and Resistance.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (40.84%)
  • Botany (24.08%)
  • PEST analysis (19.37%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Agronomy (40.84%)
  • Cultivar (28.27%)
  • Crop (28.80%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Agronomy, Cultivar, Crop, Resistance and Plant disease resistance. Lloyd T. Wilson has researched Agronomy in several fields, including PEST analysis, Crambidae and Botany. His work on Lepidoptera genitalia, Diatraea saccharalis and Braconidae as part of general Botany study is frequently linked to TEMPERATURE ELEVATION and Diatraea evanescens, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

His Cultivar research includes elements of Grain quality, Melanaphis sacchari, Aphididae, Panicle and Aphid. The concepts of his Crop study are interwoven with issues in Oryza, Simulation modeling and Annual percentage yield. The various areas that he examines in his Resistance study include Cropping, Biotechnology, Abiotic component and Interception.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Food security and climate change: on the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (100 citations)
  • Yield gap analysis of US rice production systems shows opportunities for improvement. (30 citations)
  • Biomass production of herbaceous energy crops in the United States: field trial results and yield potential maps from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership (28 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Botany

Lloyd T. Wilson mostly deals with Agronomy, Climate change, Yield, Ecology and Crambidae. All of his Agronomy and Crop and Sorghum investigations are sub-components of the entire Agronomy study. His Climate change study incorporates themes from Food processing, Natural resource economics, Agricultural productivity and Agricultural science.

The Abiotic component, Interception and Resistance research Lloyd T. Wilson does as part of his general Ecology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Phenotypic trait, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His research integrates issues of Perennial plant, Bromus, Poaceae and Tiller in his study of Crambidae. His Eoreuma loftini study which covers Integrated pest management that intersects with Cultivar.

Best Publications

  • Targeting Cultivars onto Rice Growing Environments Using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot Analyses

    Stanley Omar P. B. Samonte;Lloyd T. Wilson;Anna M. Mcclung;James C. Medley

  • Degree-days: An aid in crop and pest management

    L Wilson;W Barnett

  • Clumping Patterns of Fruit and Arthropods in Cotton, with Implications for Binomial Sampling

    L. T. Wilson;P. M. Room

  • Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition.

    W. H. Settle;L. T. Wilson

  • Path Analyses of Yield and Yield-Related Traits of Fifteen Diverse Rice Genotypes

    S. O. Pb. Samonte;L. T. Wilson;A. M. McClung

  • Food security and climate change: on the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide

    Lewis H. Ziska;James A. Bunce;Hiroyuki Shimono;David R. Gealy

  • Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency: Relationships with Grain Yield, Grain Protein, and Yield-Related Traits in Rice

    Stanley Omar P. B. Samonte;Lloyd T. Wilson;James C. Medley;Shannon R. M. Pinson

  • Contribution of Rice Tillers to Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield

    Guowei Wu;Lloyd T. Wilson;Anna M. McClung

  • Spatial and Temporal Variability of Corn Growth and Grain Yield

    S. Machado;E. D. Bynum;T. L. Archer;R. J. Lascano

  • Field Evaluation of Transgenic Tobacco Containing Genes Encoding Bacillus thuringiensis -Endotoxin or Cowpea Trypsin Inhibitor: Efficacy Against Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    Michael P. Hoffmann;Frank G. Zalom;Lloyd T. Wilson;Janet M. Smilanick

  • Multispectral Reflectance of Cotton Related to Plant Growth, Soil Water and Texture, and Site Elevation

    Hong Li;Hong Li;Robert J. Lascano;Edward M. Barnes;Jill Booker

  • Effect of common knotweed (Polygonum aviculare) on abundance and efficiency of insect predators of crop pests.

    R.L. Bugg;L.E. Ehler;L.T. Wilson

  • Seasonal variation in radiation use efficiency of irrigated rice

    Colin S Campbell;James L Heilman;Kevin J McInnes;Lloyd T Wilson

  • Seasonal Dynamics of Nonstructural Carbohydrate Partitioning in 15 Diverse Rice Genotypes

    S.O.Pb. Samonte;L.T. Wilson;A.M. McClung;L. Tarpley

  • Within-Plant Distribution of Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Cotton: A Developing Implementable Monitoring Program

    L. T. Wilson;D. Gonzalez;T. F. Leigh;V. Maggi

  • Pheromone blends of green stink bugs and possible parasitoid selection.

    J. R. Aldrich;W. R. Lusby;B. E. Marron;K. C. Nicolaou

  • Yield gap analysis of US rice production systems shows opportunities for improvement.

    Matthew B. Espe;Kenneth G. Cassman;Haishun Yang;Nicolas Guilpart

  • Population Dynamics and Within-Plant Distribution of the Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), an Early-Season Predator of Spider Mites Infesting Cotton

    C. H. Pickett;L. T. Wilson;D. González

  • Diel and seasonal variation in CO2 flux of irrigated rice

    Colin S Campbell;James L Heilman;Kevin J McInnes;Lloyd T Wilson

  • Biomass production of herbaceous energy crops in the United States: field trial results and yield potential maps from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership

    DoKyoung Lee;Ezra Aberle;Eric K. Anderson;William Anderson

  • Within-plant distribution of predators on cotton: comments on sampling and predator efficiencies.

    L. T. Wilson;A. P. Gutierrez

  • Spatial and temporal variability of corn grain yield: site-specific relationships of biotic and abiotic factors.

    S. Machado;E. D. Bynum;T. L. Archer;R. J. Lascano

  • Integrated pest management systems and cotton production.

    R. E. Frisbie;K. M. El-Zik;L. T. Wilson

  • Within-plant distribution of the immatures of Heliothis zea (Boddie) on cotton.

    L. T. Wilson;A. P. Gutierrez;T. F. Leigh

  • Development of an automated climatic data scraping, filtering and display system

    Y. Yang;L. T. Wilson;J. Wang

  • Causes of variation among rice models in yield response to CO2 examined with Free-Air CO2 Enrichment and growth chamber experiments

    Toshihiro Hasegawa;Tao Li;Xinyou Yin;Yan Zhu

  • Computer-based cotton pest management in Australia

    A.B. Hearn;P.M. Ives;P.M. Room;N.J. Thomson

  • Monitoring and integrated management of arthropod pests of small fruit crops

    N.J. Bostanian;L.T. Wilson;T.J. Dennehy

  • A roadmap towards sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl

    Shen Yuan;Bruce Linquist;Lloyd Wilson;Kenneth Cassman

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank G. Zalom
Frank G. Zalom University of California, Davis
Andrew Paul Gutierrez
Andrew Paul Gutierrez University of California, Berkeley
Robert J. Lascano
Robert J. Lascano United States Department of Agriculture
Anna M. McClung
Anna M. McClung Agricultural Research Service
Kevin F. Bronson
Kevin F. Bronson Agricultural Research Service
Marjorie A. Hoy
Marjorie A. Hoy University of Florida
Frank H. Arthur
Frank H. Arthur Agricultural Research Service
Xinyou Yin
Xinyou Yin Wageningen University & Research
Kenneth J. Boote
Kenneth J. Boote University of Florida
Toshihiro Hasegawa
Toshihiro Hasegawa National Agriculture and Food Research Organization

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lloyd T. Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles