D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Neuroscience D-index 33 Citations 3,407 61 World Ranking 4704 National Ranking 395

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Neuroscience
  • Statistics
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Auditory cortex, Auditory perception, Stimulus, Neuroscience and Functional magnetic resonance imaging are his primary areas of study. His Auditory cortex study frequently links to related topics such as Percept. His Auditory perception study is focused on Perception in general.

In his research, Pattern recognition, Artificial intelligence, Surprise and Bioinformatics is intimately related to Local field potential, which falls under the overarching field of Stimulus. His study in the fields of Valence, Nerve net, Amygdala and Time perception under the domain of Neuroscience overlaps with other disciplines such as Feeling. His studies in Functional magnetic resonance imaging integrate themes in fields like Planum temporale, Speech recognition, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Feature.

His most cited work include:

  • Distinct neural substrates of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing. (237 citations)
  • Features versus feelings: dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds. (96 citations)
  • Features versus feelings: dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds. (96 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Auditory cortex, Neuroscience, Perception, Stimulus and Auditory perception. His work deals with themes such as Planum temporale, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Artificial intelligence, Local field potential and Pattern recognition, which intersect with Auditory cortex. He usually deals with Perception and limits it to topics linked to Loudness and Thalamus and Limbic lobe.

His Stimulus study combines topics in areas such as Intraparietal sulcus, Speech recognition, Psychophysics and Bioinformatics. His Bioinformatics study incorporates themes from Log probability and Surprise. His Auditory perception research incorporates elements of Cognitive psychology, Natural sounds and Speech perception.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Auditory cortex (77.01%)
  • Neuroscience (66.67%)
  • Perception (52.87%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Auditory cortex (77.01%)
  • Neuroscience (66.67%)
  • Cortex (6.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Auditory cortex, Neuroscience, Cortex, Electrocorticography and Gyrus. Sukhbinder Kumar has researched Auditory cortex in several fields, including Mirror neuron, Pattern analysis, Coding, Posterior parietal cortex and Pattern recognition. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Posterior parietal cortex, Perception is strongly linked to Cortex.

Sukhbinder Kumar combines subjects such as Cognitive psychology, Loudness, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Neuroimaging and Sensory cortex with his study of Perception. His primary area of study in Neuroscience is in the field of Local field potential. His research in Electrocorticography intersects with topics in Superior temporal gyrus, Electrophysiology, Stimulus, Working memory and Planum temporale.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • How Can Hearing Loss Cause Dementia (8 citations)
  • Direct electrophysiological mapping of human pitch-related processing in auditory cortex (4 citations)
  • Direct electrophysiological mapping of human pitch-related processing in auditory cortex (4 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Distinct neural substrates of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing.

Sundeep Teki;Manon Grube;Sukhbinder Kumar;Timothy D. Griffiths.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2011)

348 Citations

Features versus feelings: dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds.

Sukhbinder Kumar;Sukhbinder Kumar;Katharina von Kriegstein;Karl Friston;Timothy D. Griffiths;Timothy D. Griffiths.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2012)

140 Citations

Hierarchical processing of auditory objects in humans.

Sukhbinder Kumar;Klaas E Stephan;Jason D Warren;Karl J Friston.
PLOS Computational Biology (2005)

117 Citations

Brain bases for auditory stimulus-driven figure–ground segregation

S Teki;S Teki;M Chait;S Kumar;S Kumar;K von Kriegstein;K von Kriegstein.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2011)

114 Citations

Direct recordings of pitch responses from human auditory cortex.

Timothy D. Griffiths;Sukhbinder Kumar;William Sedley;Kirill V. Nourski.
Current Biology (2010)

105 Citations

A Brain System for Auditory Working Memory.

Sukhbinder Kumar;Sabine Joseph;Phillip E. Gander;Nicolas Barascud.
The Journal of Neuroscience (2016)

99 Citations

Neural signatures of perceptual inference

William Sedley;William Sedley;Phillip E Gander;Sukhbinder Kumar;Sukhbinder Kumar;Sukhbinder Kumar;Christopher K Kovach.
eLife (2016)

97 Citations

Improved principal component monitoring using the local approach

Uwe Kruger;Sukhbinder Kumar;Tim Littler.
Automatica (2007)

95 Citations

The Brain Basis for Misophonia

Sukhbinder Kumar;Sukhbinder Kumar;Olana Tansley-Hancock;William Sedley;Joel S. Winston.
Current Biology (2017)

95 Citations

An Integrative Tinnitus Model Based on Sensory Precision

William Sedley;Karl J. Friston;Phillip E. Gander;Sukhbinder Kumar.
Trends in Neurosciences (2016)

89 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Sukhbinder Kumar

Timothy D. Griffiths

Timothy D. Griffiths

Newcastle University

Publications: 66

Jonas Obleser

Jonas Obleser

University of Lübeck

Publications: 28

David Poeppel

David Poeppel

Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience

Publications: 24

Marcus T. Pearce

Marcus T. Pearce

Queen Mary University of London

Publications: 23

Sonja A. Kotz

Sonja A. Kotz

Maastricht University

Publications: 20

Karl J. Friston

Karl J. Friston

University College London

Publications: 19

Klaas E. Stephan

Klaas E. Stephan

University of Zurich

Publications: 18

Sven Vanneste

Sven Vanneste

Trinity College Dublin

Publications: 18

Chunhui Zhao

Chunhui Zhao

Zhejiang University

Publications: 18

Elvira Brattico

Elvira Brattico

Royal Academy of Music

Publications: 16

Jason D. Warren

Jason D. Warren

University College London

Publications: 15

Martin Meyer

Martin Meyer

University of Zurich

Publications: 15

Peter Vuust

Peter Vuust

Royal Academy of Music

Publications: 15

Shihab A. Shamma

Shihab A. Shamma

University of Maryland, College Park

Publications: 13

Laurel J. Trainor

Laurel J. Trainor

McMaster University

Publications: 13

Uwe Kruger

Uwe Kruger

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Publications: 12

Trending Scientists

Matt W. Mutka

Matt W. Mutka

Michigan State University

Kurt Faber

Kurt Faber

University of Graz

Jonathan R. Lloyd

Jonathan R. Lloyd

University of Manchester

John Hunt

John Hunt

University of Sydney

V. H. Oddy

V. H. Oddy

University of New England

Sunil Kadri

Sunil Kadri

University of Stirling

Yuan-Tsong Chen

Yuan-Tsong Chen

Academia Sinica

Thomas Edlund

Thomas Edlund

Umeå University

Luis F. Parada

Luis F. Parada

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Jean-Marc Sabatier

Jean-Marc Sabatier

Aix-Marseille University

Uwe Brand

Uwe Brand

Brock University

Bas Eickhout

Bas Eickhout

Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Norman Geschwind

Norman Geschwind

Harvard University

Susan Preston-Martin

Susan Preston-Martin

University of Southern California

Francesco Paolo Schena

Francesco Paolo Schena

University of Bari Aldo Moro

Brian Uzzi

Brian Uzzi

Northwestern University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.