World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
45
Citations
13357
World Ranking
19045
National Ranking
7773

Rollie J. Clem publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rollie J. Clem sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 85 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Rollie J. Clem D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rollie J. Clem sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rollie J. Clem is a researcher affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States, with contributions across various fields related to biology and medicine. Their work primarily addresses topics within medicine, agricultural and biological sciences, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. This multidisciplinary approach reflects a focus on both fundamental biological processes and applied medical research.

The scientist's research subfields include public health, environmental and occupational health, insect science, molecular biology, infectious diseases, and immunology. These domains intersect in their investigations into vector-borne diseases and the immune responses of invertebrates, indicating a detailed examination of disease transmission and host-pathogen interactions.

The main topics of Rollie J. Clem's research encompass:

  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Viral infections and vectors
  • Insect resistance and genetics
  • Invertebrate immune response mechanisms
  • Viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects
  • Fibroblast growth factor research

Rollie J. Clem has a variety of recent publications, demonstrating ongoing engagement with entomological virology and vector biology. Notable papers include:

  • Extreme infectious titer variability in individual Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Sindbis virus is associated with both differences in virus population structure and dramatic disparities in specific infectivity (2024, PLoS Pathogens)
  • Factors Affecting Arbovirus Midgut Escape in Mosquitoes (2023, Pathogens)
  • Investigation of Biological Factors Contributing to Individual Variation in Viral Titer after Oral Infection of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes by Sindbis Virus (2022, Viruses)
  • Expressing the Pro-Apoptotic Reaper Protein via Insertion into the Structural Open Reading Frame of Sindbis Virus Reduces the Ability to Infect Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes (2022, Viruses)
  • Infection of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes with Midgut-Attenuated Sindbis Virus Reduces, but Does Not Eliminate, Disseminated Infection (2021, Journal of Virology)

The distribution of publications reveals consistent contributions to the journal Viruses, along with other journals such as PLoS Pathogens, Pathogens, and the Journal of Virology. This reflects the scientist's focus on virology, particularly in the context of mosquito-borne viruses.

Rollie J. Clem frequently collaborates with specific researchers in their field. These coauthors include:

  • Alexis Carpenter
  • Peter Hodoameda
  • Scott R. Santos
  • Robert E. Ditter
  • Gregory D. Ebel

Their collaborative network suggests interdisciplinary work bridging virology, entomology, and molecular biology. Overall, Rollie J. Clem's scientific contributions focus heavily on the dynamics of virus-mosquito interactions, immune mechanisms in insects, and factors influencing arbovirus transmission.

Best Publications

  • Conversion of Bcl-2 to a Bax-like Death Effector by Caspases

    Emily H.-Y. Cheng;Emily H.-Y. Cheng;David G. Kirsch;David G. Kirsch;Rollie J. Clem;Rollie J. Clem;Rajani Ravi;Rajani Ravi

  • An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif.

    N E Crook;R J Clem;L K Miller

  • Prevention of Apoptosis by a Baculovirus Gene During Infection of Insect Cells

    Rollie J. Clem;Marcus Fechheimer;Lois K. Miller

  • A conserved family of cellular genes related to the baculovirus iap gene and encoding apoptosis inhibitors.

    C S Duckett;V E Nava;R W Gedrich;R J Clem

  • An apoptosis-inhibiting gene from a nuclear polyhedrosis virus encoding a polypeptide with Cys/His sequence motifs.

    M J Birnbaum;R J Clem;L K Miller

  • Control of programmed cell death by the baculovirus genes p35 and iap.

    R J Clem;L K Miller

  • Modulation of cell death by Bcl-XL through caspase interaction.

    Rollie J. Clem;Rollie J. Clem;Emily H.-Y. Cheng;Emily H.-Y. Cheng;Christopher L. Karp;David G. Kirsch

  • Hid, Rpr and Grim negatively regulate DIAP1 levels through distinct mechanisms

    Soon Ji Yoo;Jun R. Huh;Israel R. Muro;Hong Yu

  • Tissue Barriers to Arbovirus Infection in Mosquitoes.

    Alexander Franz;Asher Kantor;A. Passarelli;Rollie Clem

  • Apoptosis reduces both the in vitro replication and the in vivo infectivity of a baculovirus.

    R J Clem;L K Miller

  • Multifaceted biological insights from a draft genome sequence of the tobacco hornworm moth, Manduca sexta

    Michael R. Kanost;Estela L. Arrese;Xiaolong Cao;Yun Ru Chen

  • Pathogenomics of Culex quinquefasciatus and Meta-Analysis of Infection Responses to Diverse Pathogens

    Lyric C. Bartholomay;Robert M. Waterhouse;Robert M. Waterhouse;Robert M. Waterhouse;George F. Mayhew;Corey L. Campbell

  • The Drosophila DIAP1 protein is required to prevent accumulation of a continuously generated, processed form of the apical caspase DRONC.

    Israel Muro;Bruce A. Hay;Rollie J. Clem

  • Baculoviruses and apoptosis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

    R J Clem

  • Herpesvirus saimiri encodes a functional homolog of the human bcl-2 oncogene.

    V. E. Nava;E. H.-Y. Cheng;M. Veliuona;S. Zou

  • The role of apoptosis in defense against baculovirus infection in insects.

    R. J. Clem

  • Baculoviruses and apoptosis: a diversity of genes and responses.

    Rollie J Clem

  • Sindbis Virus Induces Apoptosis through a Caspase-Dependent, CrmA-Sensitive Pathway

    Victor E. Nava;Antony Rosen;Michael A. Veliuona;Rollie J. Clem

  • c-IAP1 Is Cleaved by Caspases to Produce a Proapoptotic C-terminal Fragment

    Rollie J. Clem;Ting Ting Sheu;Bettina W.M. Richter;Wei Wu He

  • Insect defenses against virus infection: the role of apoptosis.

    Thomas E Clarke;Rollie J Clem

Frequent Co-Authors

Lois K. Miller
Lois K. Miller University of Georgia
J. Marie Hardwick
J. Marie Hardwick Johns Hopkins University
George F. Rohrmann
George F. Rohrmann Oregon State University
Robert M. Waterhouse
Robert M. Waterhouse Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Emily H. Cheng
Emily H. Cheng Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Evgeny M. Zdobnov
Evgeny M. Zdobnov Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Marc A. T. Muskavitch
Marc A. T. Muskavitch Biogen (United States)
Michael B. Kastan
Michael B. Kastan Duke University
Carol D. Blair
Carol D. Blair Colorado State University
Bruce A. Hay
Bruce A. Hay California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancements in online education have opened flexible pathways for students interested in Biology and Biochemistry. Many reputable universities now offer programs that allow you to study remotely while gaining valuable credentials.

If you’re looking to accelerate your biology education, consider a biology degree online. These programs let students move at their own pace and often support transfer credits, making them ideal for self-motivated learners.

For those interested in nursing, asn online nursing programs can be a practical starting point. They prepare you for the NCLEX-RN exam and entry-level roles in healthcare, building on foundational biology and biochemistry courses.

Already working as a medical assistant? Advancing your credentials through a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online can expand your career options and salary potential, blending biology theory with clinical practice.

Finally, with growing awareness about diet and health, earning the best online nutrition degree can prepare you for roles in hospitals, community health, or wellness coaching. These programs delve into biochemistry, food science, and wellness strategies.

Best Scientists Citing Rollie J. Clem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles