World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9872 9239 683 640 78 5072

Eric Hehman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Hehman between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Hehman published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2025. 20 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2025. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 13 publications
2010 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Hehman: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 3
2012 3
2013 3
2014 8
2015 5
2016 5
2017 4
2018 11
2019 8
2020 10
2021 12
2022 10
2023 5
2024 7
2025 13
Total 108
Download as CSV

Eric Hehman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Hehman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Hehman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Hehman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric Hehman is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions also in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

Their work covers multiple main topics, including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Face Recognition and Perception, and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification.

Eric Hehman has published numerous papers in respected venues. Frequent publication outlets include Social Psychological and Personality Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Social Cognition, Nature Human Behaviour, and Behavior Research Methods.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Facial Impressions Are Predicted by the Structure of Group Stereotypes, 2021, Psychological Science
  • Dress is a Fundamental Component of Person Perception, 2023, Personality and Social Psychology Review

Eric Hehman has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Sally Y Xie
  • Neil Hester
  • Ryan M. Stolier
  • Jonathan B. Freeman
  • Eugene K. Ofosu

Best Publications

  • Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations

    Jessica K. Flake;Jolynn Pek;Eric Hehman

  • Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science

    Eric Hehman;Ryan M. Stolier;Jonathan B. Freeman

  • Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents

    Eric Hehman;Jessica K. Flake;Jimmy Calanchini

  • Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias

    Eugene K. Ofosu;Michelle K. Chambers;Jacqueline M. Chen;Eric Hehman

  • The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.

    Eric Hehman;Clare A M Sutherland;Jessica K Flake;Michael L Slepian

  • To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Jessica K. Flake;Marco Tullio Liuzza

  • Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test

    Anthony G Greenwald;Miguel Brendl;Huajian Cai;Dario Cvencek

  • Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect

    Eric Hehman;Eric W. Mania;Samuel L. Gaertner

  • Blacks’ Death Rate Due to Circulatory Diseases Is Positively Related to Whites’ Explicit Racial Bias: A Nationwide Investigation Using Project Implicit

    Jordan B. Leitner;Eric Hehman;Ozlem Ayduk;Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton

  • Establishing construct validity evidence for regional measures of explicit and implicit racial bias.

    Eric Hehman;Jimmy Calanchini;Jessica K Flake;Jordan B Leitner

  • Amygdala Responsivity to High-Level Social Information from Unseen Faces

    Jonathan B. Freeman;Jonathan B. Freeman;Ryan M. Stolier;Zachary A. Ingbretsen;Eric A. Hehman

  • The conceptual structure of face impressions

    Ryan M. Stolier;Eric Hehman;Matthias D. Keller;Mirella Walker

  • Static and Dynamic Facial Cues Differentially Affect the Consistency of Social Evaluations

    Eric Hehman;Jessica K. Flake;Jonathan B. Freeman

  • Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation

    Eric Hehman;Jordan B. Leitner;Samuel L. Gaertner

  • Racial bias is associated with ingroup death rate for Blacks and Whites: Insights from Project Implicit.

    Jordan B. Leitner;Eric Hehman;Ozlem Ayduk;Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton

  • Group Status Drives Majority and Minority Integration Preferences

    Eric Hehman;Samuel L. Gaertner;John F. Dovidio;Eric W. Mania

  • Early Processing of Gendered Facial Cues Predicts the Electoral Success of Female Politicians

    Eric Hehman;Colleen M. Carpinella;Kerri L. Johnson;Jordan B. Leitner

  • A common ingroup identity: Categorization, identity, and intergroup relations.

    Samuel L. Gaertner;John F. Dovidio;Rita Guerra;Eric Hehman

  • Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender.

    Sally Y. Xie;Jessica K. Flake;Eric Hehman

  • The neural basis of stereotypic impact on multiple social categorization

    Eric Hehman;Eric Hehman;Zachary A. Ingbretsen;Jonathan B. Freeman;Jonathan B. Freeman

  • Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition.

    Ryan M. Stolier;Eric Hehman;Jonathan B. Freeman;Jonathan B. Freeman

  • Facial Structure Is Indicative of Explicit Support for Prejudicial Beliefs

    Eric Hehman;Jordan B. Leitner;Matthew P. Deegan;Samuel L. Gaertner

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel L. Gaertner
Samuel L. Gaertner University of Delaware
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Malte Friese
Malte Friese Saarland University
Kerri L. Johnson
Kerri L. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Huajian Cai
Huajian Cai University of Oklahoma
Nicholas O. Rule
Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students interested in psychology also consider social work, as both fields share a commitment to mental health and helping others. Accredited programs across the country provide flexible online options for students at all stages of their careers.

If you are considering social work, you may want to research the best social work programs in Virginia or the best social work programs in West Virginia, both of which offer a range of undergraduate and graduate opportunities. For those interested in advancing even further, there are easiest online social work doctorate programs in the US that offer flexible, accessible learning paths.

Students seeking a streamlined route to a graduate credential might explore the easiest online social work master's programs in the US. Each pathway equips graduates with valuable skills, opening doors to careers in counseling, community services, and clinical environments.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Hehman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles