World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leo Paul Dana

Leo Paul Dana

Award Badge
Business and Management
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 77 194 179 1 1 539 22755

Leo Paul Dana publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leo Paul Dana between 1974 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leo Paul Dana published across 50 years, from 1974 to 2023, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2021. 11 of the 541 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2021. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 34 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 50 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 61 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications
1974 2023

541 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leo Paul Dana: publications per year, 1974 to 2023
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 3
1988 3
1989 0
1990 4
1991 0
1992 3
1993 4
1994 2
1995 4
1996 6
1997 1
1998 3
1999 34
2000 24
2001 12
2002 10
2003 12
2004 12
2005 8
2006 19
2007 28
2008 23
2009 20
2010 19
2011 15
2012 10
2013 17
2014 16
2015 23
2016 17
2017 50
2018 15
2019 24
2020 25
2021 61
2022 5
2023 6
Total 541
Download as CSV

Leo Paul Dana publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Paul Dana sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 436+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 539 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100 539
Download as CSV

Leo Paul Dana D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Paul Dana sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19 77
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Business and Management in France Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • World War II
  • Law
  • China

Leo Paul Dana mainly focuses on Entrepreneurship, Internationalization, Industrial organization, Economic growth and Marketing. Leo Paul Dana combines subjects such as Ethnic group, International business, Small business, Social science and Economic system with his study of Entrepreneurship. His Internationalization study incorporates themes from Competition, Competitor analysis and Economic geography.

His studies in Industrial organization integrate themes in fields like Novelty and Globalization. His studies deal with areas such as Family values, Indigenous and The Republic as well as Economic growth. His study looks at the intersection of Marketing and topics like Profit with Demise and Strategic management.

His most cited work include:

  • Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research (276 citations)
  • Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: “Opting-in” to the global economy (199 citations)
  • Boundaries of Social Capital in Entrepreneurship (183 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Leo Paul Dana mainly investigates Entrepreneurship, Economy, Economic growth, Marketing and Small business. He has included themes like Indigenous, Economic geography, Internationalization, Government and Middle East in his Entrepreneurship study. His research in Internationalization intersects with topics in Economic system, Industrial organization and International business.

His study brings together the fields of Palestine and Middle East. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Competition and China. His work deals with themes such as Social entrepreneurship and Ethnic group, which intersect with Economic growth.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Entrepreneurship (64.85%)
  • Economy (19.25%)
  • Economic growth (17.57%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Entrepreneurship (64.85%)
  • Economic geography (6.69%)
  • Economic growth (17.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Entrepreneurship, Economic geography, Economic growth, Economy and Industrial organization. When carried out as part of a general Entrepreneurship research project, his work on Social entrepreneurship is frequently linked to work in Montenegro, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. Leo Paul Dana frequently studies issues relating to Development studies and Social entrepreneurship.

The study of Economic geography is intertwined with the study of Capital in a number of ways. He integrates Economy and Bazaar in his research. His Government study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Middle East.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Immigrant entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda (47 citations)
  • Pathways of SME Internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review (33 citations)
  • Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach (33 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • World War II
  • Law
  • China

Leo Paul Dana spends much of his time researching Entrepreneurship, Internationalization, Economic geography, Industrial organization and Classical economics. His Entrepreneurship research includes elements of Social science, Diversity and Politics. His Internationalization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Process innovation, Service, Profit and Service innovation.

Leo Paul Dana interconnects Reproduction, Data collection, Diversity, Southern Hemisphere and Community structure in the investigation of issues within Economic geography. His Industrial organization study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Coopetition, Realm and Novelty. The Classical economics study combines topics in areas such as Economic sector, Empirical evidence, Relation and Human capital.

Best Publications

  • Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research

    Leo Paul Dana;Teresa E. Dana

  • Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: “Opting-in” to the global economy

    Robert B. Anderson;Leo Paul Dana;Teresa E. Dana

  • Boundaries of Social Capital in Entrepreneurship

    Ivan H Light;Leo Paul Dana

  • Entrepreneurship in a Remote Sub-Arctic Community:

    Leo-Paul Dana

  • Immigrant entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda

    Marina Dabić;Marina Dabić;Bozidar Vlačić;Justin Paul;Justin Paul;Leo-Paul Dana

  • Towards a theory of indigenous entrepreneurship

    Ana Maria Peredo;Robert B. Anderson;Craig S. Galbraith;Benson Honig

  • The education and training of entrepreneurs in Asia

    Leo Paul Dana

  • Creating Entrepreneurs in India

    Leo Paul Dana

  • Qualitative research revisited: epistemology of a comprehensive approach

    Léo Paul Dana;Hervé Dumez

  • Symbiotic International Business Networks: Collaboration between Small and Large Firms

    Hamid Etemad;Richard W. Wright;Leo Paul Dana

  • Religion as an Explanatory Variable for Entrepreneurship

    Leo Paul Dana

  • Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review

    Marina Dabic;Marina Dabic;Jane F. Maley;Leo-Paul Dana;Ivan Novak

  • International Entrepreneurship Research: What Scope for International Business Theories?

    Stephen Young;Pavlos Dimitratos;Léo-Paul Dana

  • Entrepreneurial marketing dimensions and SMEs performance

    Nora Sadiku-Dushi;Léo-Paul Dana;Veland Ramadani

  • ICT, Innovation and Firm Performance: The Transition Economies Context

    Shqipe Gërguri-Rashiti;Veland Ramadani;Hyrije Abazi-Alili;Léo-Paul Dana

  • Women entrepreneurs in the Republic of Macedonia: waiting for directions

    Veland Ramadani;Shqipe Gërguri;Leo Paul Dana;Tatjana Tašaminova

  • Handbook of research on ethnic minority entrepreneurship : a co-evolutionary view on resource management

    Leo Paul Dana

  • Asian Models Of Entrepreneurship - From The Indian Union And Nepal To The Japanese Archipelago: Context, Policy And Practice

    Leo Paul Dana

  • Local Open Innovation : A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs

    Anja Leckel;Sophie Veilleux;Leo Paul Dana

  • Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach

    Veland Ramadani;Robert D. Hisrich;Hyrije Abazi-Alili;Léo-Paul Dana

  • Changing Paradigms of International Entrepreneurship Strategy

    Richard W. Wright;Léo-Paul Dana

  • Toward a Theory of Indigenous Entrepreneurship

    Ana Maria Peredo;Robert B. Anderson;Craig Galbraith;Benson Honig

Frequent Co-Authors

Veland Ramadani
Veland Ramadani South East European University
Vanessa Ratten
Vanessa Ratten La Trobe University
Isabell M. Welpe
Isabell M. Welpe Technical University of Munich
Ivan Light
Ivan Light University of California, Los Angeles
Marina Dabić
Marina Dabić University of Zagreb
Benson Honig
Benson Honig McMaster University
João J. Ferreira
João J. Ferreira University of Beira Interior
Robert D. Hisrich
Robert D. Hisrich Kent State University
Gerard McElwee
Gerard McElwee York St John University
Zoltan J. Acs
Zoltan J. Acs George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management studies in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Students seeking advanced leadership roles in corporations or nonprofits may consider an online phd leadership program, which is designed to build expertise in organizational strategy and change management.

For those looking for flexible and recognized academic options, nationally accredited online universities offer accredited business programs that meet rigorous academic standards and provide greater acceptance in the job market.

Individuals interested in specialized management sectors can also benefit from accelerated programs. The best 2 year construction management degree online options allow students to quickly enter a dynamic field with strong industry growth.

Meanwhile, those passionate about the healthcare industry may opt for a career in administration through online programs for healthcare administration, which are designed to prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Leo Paul Dana

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles