What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Leo Paul Dana mainly focuses on Entrepreneurship, Internationalization, Industrial organization, Economic growth and Marketing.
Leo Paul Dana combines subjects such as Ethnic group, International business, Small business, Social science and Economic system with his study of Entrepreneurship.
His Internationalization study incorporates themes from Competition, Competitor analysis and Economic geography.
His studies in Industrial organization integrate themes in fields like Novelty and Globalization.
His studies deal with areas such as Family values, Indigenous and The Republic as well as Economic growth.
His study looks at the intersection of Marketing and topics like Profit with Demise and Strategic management.
His most cited work include:
- Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research (276 citations)
- Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: “Opting-in” to the global economy (199 citations)
- Boundaries of Social Capital in Entrepreneurship (183 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Leo Paul Dana mainly investigates Entrepreneurship, Economy, Economic growth, Marketing and Small business.
He has included themes like Indigenous, Economic geography, Internationalization, Government and Middle East in his Entrepreneurship study.
His research in Internationalization intersects with topics in Economic system, Industrial organization and International business.
His study brings together the fields of Palestine and Middle East.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Competition and China.
His work deals with themes such as Social entrepreneurship and Ethnic group, which intersect with Economic growth.
He most often published in these fields:
- Entrepreneurship (64.85%)
- Economy (19.25%)
- Economic growth (17.57%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Entrepreneurship (64.85%)
- Economic geography (6.69%)
- Economic growth (17.57%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Entrepreneurship, Economic geography, Economic growth, Economy and Industrial organization.
When carried out as part of a general Entrepreneurship research project, his work on Social entrepreneurship is frequently linked to work in Montenegro, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
Leo Paul Dana frequently studies issues relating to Development studies and Social entrepreneurship.
The study of Economic geography is intertwined with the study of Capital in a number of ways.
He integrates Economy and Bazaar in his research.
His Government study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Middle East.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Immigrant entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda (47 citations)
- Pathways of SME Internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review (33 citations)
- Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach (33 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Leo Paul Dana spends much of his time researching Entrepreneurship, Internationalization, Economic geography, Industrial organization and Classical economics.
His Entrepreneurship research includes elements of Social science, Diversity and Politics.
His Internationalization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Process innovation, Service, Profit and Service innovation.
Leo Paul Dana interconnects Reproduction, Data collection, Diversity, Southern Hemisphere and Community structure in the investigation of issues within Economic geography.
His Industrial organization study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Coopetition, Realm and Novelty.
The Classical economics study combines topics in areas such as Economic sector, Empirical evidence, Relation and Human capital.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
