World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
19248
World Ranking
19979
National Ranking
9952

Philip C. Noble publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Noble sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 265 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip C. Noble D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Noble sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip C. Noble is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Surgery. Additional areas of study include Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rheumatology, and Computational Mechanics.

Their work covers a range of topics, notably in Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic Implants and Arthroplasty, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Hip Disorders and Treatments, Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques, Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies, and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials.

Several frequent co-authors have contributed to their research, including Shuyang Han, Sabir K. Ismaily, Hugh L. Jones, David Rodríguez-Quintana, and Nicholas J. Dunbar.

Philip C. Noble has published numerous articles in a variety of specialized orthopedic and medical journals. Regular publication venues include:

  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
  • Orthopaedic Proceedings
  • Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Selected recent papers include:

  • Micromotion and Migration of Cementless Tibial Trays Under Functional Loading Conditions (2020) in The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • Contemporary Robotic Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty (2021) in Orthopedic Clinics of North America
  • Causal Discovery in Radiographic Markers of Knee Osteoarthritis and Prediction for Knee Osteoarthritis Severity With Attention-Long Short-Term Memory (2020) in Frontiers in Public Health
  • The continuum of hip range of motion: From soft-tissue restriction to bony impingement (2020) in Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
  • Designing and validation of an automated ex-vivo bioreactor system for long term culture of bone (2021) in Bone Reports

Best Publications

  • The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty.

    Philip C. Noble;Michael A. Conditt;Karon F. Cook;Kenneth B. Mathis

  • The Anatomic Basis of Femoral Component Design

    Philip C. Noble;Jerry W. Alexander;Laura J. Lindahl;David T. Yew

  • The Otto E. Aufranc Award: The role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease.

    Joseph C. Mccarthy;Philip C. Noble;Michael R. Schuck;John Wright

  • The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System.

    Giles R. Scuderi;Robert B. Bourne;Philip C. Noble;James B. Benjamin

  • Does Total Knee Replacement Restore Normal Knee Function

    Philip C. Noble;Michael J. Gordon;Jennifer M. Weiss;Robert N. Reddix

  • What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements

    Jennifer M. Weiss;Philip C. Noble;Michael A. Conditt;Harold Willis Kohl

  • Simple dislocation of the elbow in the adult. Results after closed treatment.

    T L Mehlhoff;P C Noble;J B Bennett;H S Tullos

  • The Cam-type Deformity of the Proximal Femur Arises in Childhood in Response to Vigorous Sporting Activity

    K. A. Siebenrock;F. Ferner;P. C. Noble;R. F. Santore

  • The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip

    Nobuhiko Sugano;Philip C. Noble;Emir Kamaric;Joseph K. Salama

  • The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip.

    Matthew J Crawford;Christopher J Dy;Jerry W Alexander;Matthew Thompson

  • Contributory factors and etiology of sciatic nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty.

    Bruce N. Edwards;Hugh S. Tullos;Philip C. Noble

  • Development of a new Knee Society scoring system

    Philip C. Noble;Giles R. Scuderi;Adam C. Brekke;Alla Sikorskii

  • Anatomy, pathologic features, and treatment of acetabular labral tears.

    Joseph McCarthy;Philip Noble;Frank V Aluisio;Michael Schuck

  • The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.

    Reed L. Bartz;Philip C. Noble;Nimish R. Kadakia;Hugh S. Tullos

  • Computer-based training methods for surgical procedures

    Philip C. Noble;Michael Conditt

  • The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty

    Daniel D. Rhoads;Philip C. Noble;Jeffrey D. Reuben;Ormonde M. Mahoney

  • Elution of vancomycin, daptomycin, and amikacin from acrylic bone cement.

    David K. Kuechle;Glenn C. Landon;Daniel M. Musher;Philip C. Noble

  • A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion

    Nobuhiko Sugano;Philip C. Noble;Emir Kamaric

  • The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.

    Philip C. Noble;Gloria G. Box;Emir Kamaric;Michael J. Fink

  • Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur: implications for THR.

    Philip C Noble;Emir Kamaric;Nobuhiko Sugano;Masaaki Matsubara

Frequent Co-Authors

Gangbing Song
Gangbing Song University of Houston
Robert B. Bourne
Robert B. Bourne University of Western Ontario
Karon F. Cook
Karon F. Cook Northwestern University
Klaus A. Siebenrock
Klaus A. Siebenrock University of Bern
Harold W. Kohl
Harold W. Kohl The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John J. Callaghan
John J. Callaghan University of Iowa
Hong-Nan Li
Hong-Nan Li Dalian University of Technology
Mark S. Smeltzer
Mark S. Smeltzer University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Paul Stoodley
Paul Stoodley The Ohio State University
Daniel M. Musher
Daniel M. Musher Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a medical career in the USA is diverse, and there are several flexible online options for those interested in healthcare. For individuals aiming to enter the administrative side of medicine, enrolling in online medical billing and coding courses can be a practical first step. These programs teach valuable skills for working behind the scenes in hospitals, clinics, and private practices.

Those seeking a clinical role may consider furthering their education through the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs. Nurse practitioners enjoy greater responsibilities, including patient diagnostics and care, and these online programs make advancement accessible and flexible.

Affordability is a common concern. If you’re exploring a nursing degree, understanding how much does online nursing school cost can help you make informed financial decisions and plan your future more effectively.

For those interested in leadership, education, or research in nursing, online phd nursing programs enable experienced nurses to reach the highest academic and professional levels. These programs offer flexibility while providing advanced knowledge and research skills for ambitious healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Noble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles