World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 53 2391 2153 159 147 165 9726

Thomas Braulke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Braulke between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Braulke published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2010. 2 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2010. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Braulke: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 4
1988 5
1989 2
1990 4
1991 1
1992 5
1993 3
1994 2
1995 6
1996 3
1997 3
1998 7
1999 1
2000 3
2001 5
2002 3
2003 5
2004 10
2005 6
2006 5
2007 10
2008 11
2009 6
2010 13
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 5
2015 12
2016 3
2017 5
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
2021 3
2022 3
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 192
Download as CSV

Thomas Braulke publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Braulke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 165 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 165
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Braulke D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Braulke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106 53
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Sorting of lysosomal proteins.

    Thomas Braulke;Juan S. Bonifacino

  • Lysine Glutarylation Is a Protein Posttranslational Modification Regulated by SIRT5

    Minjia Tan;Chao Peng;Kristin A. Anderson;Peter Chhoy

  • Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses

    Anu Jalanko;Thomas Braulke

  • Mucolipidosis II is caused by mutations in GNPTA encoding the alpha/beta GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferase.

    Stephan Tiede;Stephan Storch;Torben Lübke;Bernhard Henrissat

  • A Key Enzyme in the Biogenesis of Lysosomes Is a Protease That Regulates Cholesterol Metabolism

    Katrin Marschner;Katrin Kollmann;Michaela Schweizer;Thomas Braulke

  • A New Type of Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation (CDG-Ii) Provides New Insights into the Early Steps of Dolichol-linked Oligosaccharide Biosynthesis

    Christian Thiel;Markus Schwarz;Jianhe Peng;Michal Grzmil

  • Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor fails to interact with G-proteins. Analysis of mutant cytoplasmic receptor domains.

    Christian Körner;Bernd Nürnberg;Martina Uhde;Thomas Braulke

  • Protein kinase a dependent phosphorylation of apical membrane antigen 1 plays an important role in erythrocyte invasion by the malaria parasite.

    Kerstin Leykauf;Moritz Treeck;Paul R. Gilson;Thomas Nebl

  • Scoring evaluation of the natural course of mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (Sanfilippo syndrome type A).

    Ann Meyer;Kai Kossow;Andreas Gal;Chris Mühlhausen

  • Cell biology and function of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-related proteins.

    Katrin Kollmann;Kristiina Uusi-Rauva;Enzo Scifo;Jaana Tyynelä

  • PROTEOLYSIS OF INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTORS (IGF) AND IGF BINDING PROTEINS BY CATHEPSIN D

    Max Claussen;Bernd Kübler;Martin Wendland;Klaus Neifer

  • Mannose phosphorylation in health and disease.

    Katrin Kollmann;Sandra Pohl;Katrin Marschner;Marisa Encarnação

  • Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor: distinct binding sites for mannose 6-phosphate and insulin-like growth factor II.

    Thomas Braulke;Christa Causin;Abdul Waheed;Ulrich Junghans

  • Localization of the insulin-like growth factor II binding site to amino acids 1508-1566 in repeat 11 of the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor.

    Bernhard Schmidt;Christina Kiecke-Siemsen;Abdul Waheed;Thomas Braulke

  • In Vivo Evidence for Lysosome Depletion and Impaired Autophagic Clearance in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Type SPG11.

    Rita-Eva Varga;Mukhran Khundadze;Markus Damme;Sandor Nietzsche

  • Functional biology of the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) proteins.

    Aija Kyttälä;Ulla Lahtinen;Thomas Braulke;Sandra L. Hofmann

  • Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II-binding proteins in human serum and urine. Their relation to the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor.

    C Causin;A Waheed;T Braulke;U Junghans

  • Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin like growth factor II receptor: the two types of ligands bind simultaneously to one receptor at different sites.

    Abdul Waheed;Thomas Braulke;Ulrich Junghans;Kurt von Figura

  • Defective endoplasmic reticulum-resident membrane protein CLN6 affects lysosomal degradation of endocytosed arylsulfatase A.

    Claudia Heine;Bettina Koch;Stephan Storch;Alfried Kohlschütter

  • Regulation of the mannose 6-phosphate/IGF II receptor expression at the cell surface by mannose 6-phosphate, insulin like growth factors and epidermal growth factor.

    T Braulke;S Tippmer;E Neher;K von Figura

Frequent Co-Authors

Michaela Schweizer
Michaela Schweizer Universität Hamburg
Sara E. Mole
Sara E. Mole University College London
Volkmar Gieselmann
Volkmar Gieselmann University of Bonn
Markus Glatzel
Markus Glatzel Universität Hamburg
Andrej Hasilik
Andrej Hasilik Philipp University of Marburg
Paul Saftig
Paul Saftig Kiel University
Werner F. Blum
Werner F. Blum University of Giessen
Joachim Thiem
Joachim Thiem Universität Hamburg
Michael Amling
Michael Amling Universität Hamburg
Andreas Gal
Andreas Gal Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to a wide spectrum of online degrees and rewarding career paths in science and health. Many students find that their interests overlap with fields like psychology, counseling, or forensic science, where a strong foundation in biology and research is highly valued.

For those interested in the intersection of science and law, careers in forensic psychology offer opportunities to apply biological principles in legal investigations and the justice system. If you’re passionate about supporting mental health in younger populations, an online masters child psychology program can help leverage your scientific knowledge in a therapeutic setting.

There is also a growing demand for well-trained counselors. With several affordable masters in counseling programs now fully online, students can easily complement their molecular biology background. Additionally, those interested in deep clinical work may consider clinical psychology masters programs online, which offer a flexible path toward licensure and advanced practice.

Each option provides unique professional possibilities and allows you to apply your molecular biology skills in new and impactful ways.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Braulke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles