World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
84
Citations
22423
World Ranking
3371
National Ranking
1695

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
23061
World Ranking
14732
National Ranking
7453

David Roth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Roth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 405 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David Roth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Roth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Roth is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, focusing primarily on hepatology, transplantation, epidemiology, nephrology, and infectious diseases. Their body of work encompasses significant research on renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, hepatitis C virus research, renal diseases and glomerulopathies, liver disease and transplantation, pregnancy and medication impact, hepatitis B virus studies, and tuberculosis research and epidemiology.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "KDOQI US Commentary on the 2018 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention, Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Hepatitis C" (2020), published in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • "Discovery and validation of a personalized risk predictor for incident tuberculosis in low transmission settings" (2020), published in Nature Medicine
  • "Benefit of B7-1 staining and abatacept for treatment-resistant post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a predominantly pediatric cohort: time for a reappraisal" (2022), published in Pediatric Nephrology
  • "The podocyte: glomerular sentinel at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity" (2023), published in Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Randomized trial of 3 maintenance regimens (TAC/SRL vs. TAC/MMF vs. CSA/SRL) with low-dose corticosteroids in primary kidney transplantation: 18-year results" (2020), published in Clinical Transplantation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Roth include George W. Burke, Gaetano Ciancio, Warren Kupin, Mariella Ortigosa-Goggins, and Adela Mattiazzi.

They have published multiple works across prominent venues such as Frontiers in Immunology, Clinical Transplantation, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Kidney International Reports, and Nature Medicine.

David Roth's research interests span several subfields with a strong focus on hepatology and transplantation, which are reflected in their extensive publication record. Their studies cover critical issues in renal transplantation outcomes, hepatitis viruses, and immune mechanisms relevant to kidney disease and transplantation medicine.

Best Publications

  • Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis

    Gabriel Contreras;Victoriano Pardo;Baudouin Leclercq;Oliver Lenz

  • Circulating urokinase receptor as a cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

    Changli Wei;Shafic El Hindi;Jing Li;Alessia Fornoni

  • Grazoprevir plus elbasvir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (the C-SURFER study): a combination phase 3 study.

    David Roth;David R. Nelson;Annette Bruchfeld;Annmarie Liapakis

  • V(D)J recombination: broken DNA molecules with covalently sealed (hairpin) coding ends in scid mouse thymocytes.

    David B. Roth;Joseph P. Menetski;Pamela B. Nakajima;Melvin J. Bosma

  • Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells: role for short sequence homologies in the joining reaction.

    D B Roth;J H Wilson

  • Growth Retardation and Leaky SCID Phenotype of Ku70-Deficient Mice

    Yansong Gu;Katherine J. Seidl;Gary A. Rathbun;Chengming Zhu

  • Ku86-deficient mice exhibit severe combined immunodeficiency and defective processing of V(D)J recombination intermediates

    Chengming Zhu;Molly A. Bogue;Dae Sik Lim;Paul Hasty

  • Modernizing the Nonhomologous End-Joining Repertoire: Alternative and Classical NHEJ Share the Stage

    Ludovic Deriano;David B Roth

  • Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells.

    D B Roth;T N Porter;J H Wilson

  • Rag mutations reveal robust alternative end joining

    Barbara Corneo;Rebecca L. Wendland;Ludovic Deriano;Xiaoping Cui

  • Effects of DNA nonhomologous end-joining factors on telomere length and chromosomal stability in mammalian cells

    Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna;M.Prakash Hande;Wei-Min Tong;David Roth

  • Double-strand break repair in Ku86- and XRCC4-deficient cells

    Elena B. Kabotyanski;Larissa Gomelsky;Jung-Ok Han;Thomas D. Stamato

  • RAG Proteins Shepherd Double-Strand Breaks to a Specific Pathway, Suppressing Error-Prone Repair, but RAG Nicking Initiates Homologous Recombination

    Gregory S Lee;Matthew B Neiditch;Sandra S Salus;David B Roth

  • Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination

    Mark A. Landree;Jamie A. Wibbenmeyer;David B. Roth

  • Cancer predisposition and hematopoietic failure in Rad50S/S mice

    Carla F. Bender;Michael L. Sikes;Ruth Sullivan;Leslie Erskine Huye

  • A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring.

    Gaetano Ciancio;George W. Burke;Jeffrey J. Gaynor;Manuel R. Carreno

  • V(D)J recombination in mouse thymocytes: Double-strand breaks near T cell receptor δ rearrangement signals

    David B. Roth;Pamela B. Nakajima;Joseph P. Menetski;Melvin J. Bosma

  • Unexpected augmentation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy, and analogous in vitro findings

    Keith Zucker;Anne Rosen;Alexandra Tsaroucha;Ludmilla de Faria

  • Posttransplant hyperglycemia. Increased incidence in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients.

    David Roth;Martin Milgrom;Violet Esquenazi;Laphalle Fuller

  • The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on renal allograft recipients

    David Roth;Keith Zucker;Robert Cirocco;Angelo M DeMattos

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua Miller
Joshua Miller Northwestern University
Phillip Ruiz
Phillip Ruiz University of Miami
Andreas G. Tzakis
Andreas G. Tzakis Cleveland Clinic
Camillo Ricordi
Camillo Ricordi University of Miami
Paul J. Martin
Paul J. Martin Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Martin Gellert
Martin Gellert National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Stanislas Pol
Stanislas Pol Université Paris Cité
John H. Wilson
John H. Wilson Baylor College of Medicine
Jay S. Skyler
Jay S. Skyler University of Miami
David R. Nelson
David R. Nelson University of Tennessee Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and Biochemistry majors in the USA have access to a wide range of online study options and career pathways in allied health and medical sciences. For those interested in technology and diagnostics, exploring the best online radiology tech programs can be a valuable step toward a specialized healthcare career.

Nutrition and dietetics is another popular pathway. The best dietitian programs offer both bachelor’s and master’s degrees online, preparing students for roles in hospitals, wellness centers, and private practice.

If you’re interested in patient care, consider starting with a medical assisting credential. There are medical assistant programs online Michigan that provide flexible learning and access to financial aid, making it easier to enter the field.

For current medical assistants looking to expand their skills, ma to lpn bridge programs online offer a pathway to become a Licensed Practical Nurse, further increasing career options and earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing David Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles