World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 44 4802 4443 2154 1973 151 6619

Joshua Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joshua Miller between 1968 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joshua Miller published across 57 years, from 1968 to 2024, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2003. 1 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2003. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1968 2024

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joshua Miller: publications per year, 1968 to 2024
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 3
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 5
1995 7
1996 6
1997 7
1998 4
1999 9
2000 8
2001 2
2002 12
2003 17
2004 16
2005 11
2006 8
2007 9
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 5
2012 3
2013 8
2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 177
Download as CSV

Joshua Miller publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 151 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159 151
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Joshua Miller D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157 44
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Joshua Miller is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Immunology and Microbiology, with additional work in Medicine. Within these areas, their subfield specializations include Immunology and Hematology.

The main topics explored in their research cover several aspects of immune cell biology and transplantation, including:

  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Joshua Miller has contributed to the scholarly literature with publications in established venues such as Frontiers in Immunology. Their recent work includes a 2024 research article titled Differentiation of regulatory myeloid and T-cells from adult human hematopoietic stem cells after allogeneic stimulation, published in Frontiers in Immunology.

Their research collaborations feature recurrent co-authorship with several colleagues, including:

  • James M. Mathew
  • Jes M. Sanders
  • Robert Cirocco
  • Joseph R. Leventhal

Joshua Miller's contributions to the understanding of immune regulation involve investigation of how different immune cell populations arise and interact following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The focus on regulatory myeloid and T-cell differentiation highlights themes relevant to transplantation immunology and tolerance induction.

Best Publications

  • Chimerism and Tolerance Without GVHD or Engraftment Syndrome in HLA-Mismatched Combined Kidney and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

    Joseph Leventhal;Michael Abecassis;Joshua Miller;Lorenzo Gallon

  • Serial ten-year follow-up of HLA and MICA antibody production prior to kidney graft failure.

    Kazuo Mizutani;Paul Terasaki;Anne Rosen;Violet Esquenazi

  • Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation.

    Sumihito Tamura;Tomoaki Kato;Mariana Berho;Evangelos P. Misiakos

  • A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring.

    Gaetano Ciancio;George W. Burke;Jeffrey J. Gaynor;Manuel R. Carreno

  • Unexpected augmentation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy, and analogous in vitro findings

    Keith Zucker;Anne Rosen;Alexandra Tsaroucha;Ludmilla de Faria

  • The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on renal allograft recipients

    David Roth;Keith Zucker;Robert Cirocco;Angelo M DeMattos

  • High-dose donor bone marrow infusions to enhance allograft survival : The effect of timing

    Camillo Ricordi;Theodore Karatzas;Jose Nery;Marc Webb

  • The Importance of Anti-HLA-Specific Antibody Strength in Monitoring Kidney Transplant Patients

    K. Mizutani;P. Terasaki;E. Hamdani;V. Esquenazi

  • Tolerance induction in HLA disparate living donor kidney transplantation by donor stem cell infusion: durable chimerism predicts outcome.

    Joseph Leventhal;Michael Abecassis;Joshua Miller;Lorenzo Gallon

  • Six-year clinical effect of donor bone marrow infusions in renal transplant patients.

    Gaetano Ciancio;Joshua Miller;Joshua Miller;Rolando O. Garcia-Morales;Manuel Carreno

  • De novo membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in hepatitis C virus-infected renal allograft recipients.

    David Roth;Robert Cirocco;Keith Zucker;Phillip Ruiz

  • Soluble HLA‐G Expression and Renal Graft Acceptance

    J. Qiu;P. I. Terasaki;J. Miller;K. Mizutani

  • A prospective study of hepatitis C virus infection in renal allograft recipients.

    David Roth;Keith Zucker;Robert Cirocco;George Burke

  • Immune reconstitution/immunocompetence in recipients of kidney plus hematopoietic stem/facilitating cell transplants.

    Joseph R. Leventhal;Mary J. Elliott;Esma S. Yolcu;Larry D. Bozulic

  • Mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation

    S. Cho;G. Danovitch;M. Deierhoi;R. Ferguson

  • A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: three-year analysis.

    Gaetano Ciancio;George W. Burke;Jeffrey J. Gaynor;Phillip Ruiz

  • The Role of Donor Bone Marrow Infusions in Withdrawal of Immunosuppression in Adult Liver Allotransplantation

    Panagiotis Tryphonopoulos;Andreas G. Tzakis;Debbie Weppler;Rolando Garcia-Morales

  • The effects of chimeric cells following donor bone marrow infusions as detected by PCR-flow assays in kidney transplant recipients.

    Rolando Garcia-Morales;Manuel Carreno;James Mathew;Keith Zucker

  • Comparison of tacrolimus with microemulsion cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation

    Xaralambos Zervos;Deborah Weppler;Georgios Fragulidis;Maria Torres

  • A randomized trial of thymoglobulin vs. alemtuzumab (with lower dose maintenance immunosuppression) vs. daclizumab in renal transplantation at 24 months of follow-up

    Gaetano Ciancio;George W. Burke;Jeffrey J. Gaynor;David Roth

  • Preliminary experience with campath 1H (C1H) in intestinal and liver transplantation.

    Andreas G. Tzakis;Tomoaki Kato;Seigo Nishida;David M. Levi

  • Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for renal allograft recipients.

    David Roth;Jane Colona;George W. Burke;Gaetano Ciancio

  • Continuing observations on the regulatory effects of donor-specific bone marrow cell infusions and chimerism in kidney transplant recipients

    Rolando Garcia-Morales;Manuel Carreno;James Mathew;Robert Cirocco

  • Interference with tissue factor prolongs intrahepatic islet allograft survival in a nonhuman primate marginal mass model.

    Dora M. Berman;Over Cabrera;Over Cabrera;Norman M. Kenyon;Joshua Miller

  • Allosensitization of islet allograft recipients.

    Roberta Cardani;Roberta Cardani;Antonello Pileggi;Camillo Ricordi;Carmen Gomez

  • Use of older controlled non-heart-beating donors for liver transplantation.

    Tatsuya Fukumori;Tatsuya Fukumori;Tomoaki Kato;David Levi;Les Olson

  • Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant recipients.

    David Roth;John A. Fernandez;George W. Burke;Violet Esquenazi

  • Differential Effects of Calcineurin and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors on Alloreactive Th1, Th17, and Regulatory T Cells.

    Lorenzo Gallon;Opas Traitanon;Yuming Yu;Bo Shi

  • The human bone marrow as an immunoregulatory organ.

    Joshua Miller;James Mathew;Rolando Garcia-Morales;Keith E. Zucker

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas G. Tzakis
Andreas G. Tzakis Cleveland Clinic
David Roth
David Roth University of Miami
Camillo Ricordi
Camillo Ricordi University of Miami
Michael Abecassis
Michael Abecassis University of Arizona
David M. Roth
David M. Roth University of California San Diego
Phillip Ruiz
Phillip Ruiz University of Miami
Eugene R. Schiff
Eugene R. Schiff University of Miami
Suzanne T. Ildstad
Suzanne T. Ildstad University of Louisville
Christopher M. Gomez
Christopher M. Gomez University of Chicago
Bonnie B. Blomberg
Bonnie B. Blomberg University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in immunology opens doors to various healthcare roles, many of which benefit from specialized nursing education and certifications. For those already in nursing, advancing your qualifications with an acute care certification for FNP can be a strategic move, enabling you to work with patients facing complex immunological conditions in critical care settings.

If you're looking to fast-track your nursing education, accelerated NP programs offer an efficient pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner with expertise that complements immunology. For individuals without a nursing background, there are excellent online nursing programs for non nurses that provide the foundational knowledge needed to enter nursing and eventually specialize.

Additionally, if you're searching for accessible entry points into nursing, consider ABSN programs with high acceptance rates. These programs help aspiring nurses quickly obtain their Bachelor of Science in Nursing, an important step toward careers involving immunology research and patient care.

By exploring these educational routes, students and professionals can tailor their career paths to meet the evolving demands of immunology and related healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles