World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
43597
World Ranking
4195
National Ranking
2053

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
44164
World Ranking
17340
National Ranking
8690

David M. Roth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Roth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 348 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David M. Roth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Roth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

David M. Roth is affiliated with the University of California San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on more specialized areas such as Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Epidemiology.

The topics addressed in their work include mitochondrial function and pathology, cardiovascular function and risk factors, neuroendocrine tumor research advances, muscle physiology and disorders, adipose tissue and metabolism, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and caveolin-1 and cellular processes.

Recent publications by David M. Roth cover a variety of biomedical subjects and include the following papers:

  • Grief literacy: A call to action for compassionate communities, published in 2020 in Death Studies
  • Immunosuppression of Macrophages Underlies the Cardioprotective Effects of CST (Catestatin), published in 2021 in Hypertension
  • Synapsin-caveolin-1 gene therapy preserves neuronal and synaptic morphology and prevents neurodegeneration in a mouse model of AD, published in 2021 in Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • Subpial delivery of adeno-associated virus 9-synapsin-caveolin-1 (AAV9-SynCav1) preserves motor neuron and neuromuscular junction morphology, motor function, delays disease onset, and extends survival in hSOD1G93A mice, published in 2022 in Theranostics
  • Morphine induces physiological, structural, and molecular benefits in the diabetic myocardium, published in 2021 in The FASEB Journal

Frequent collaborators in Roth's research include Hemal H. Patel, Brian P. Head, Joseph Leem, Mehul Dhanani, and Jan M. Schilling.

Their most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • The FASEB Journal
  • PLoS ONE
  • Preprints.org

David M. Roth is recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation

    Andrew S. Levey;Juan P. Bosch;Julia Breyer Lewis;Tom Greene

  • A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine

    A S Levey;J P Bosch;J B Lewis;Shahriari Ali Reza

  • Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis

    Gabriel Contreras;Victoriano Pardo;Baudouin Leclercq;Oliver Lenz

  • The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines.

    Bertram L. Kasiske;Charles B. Cangro;Sundaram Hariharan;Dondald E. Hricik

  • Circulating urokinase receptor as a cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

    Changli Wei;Shafic El Hindi;Jing Li;Alessia Fornoni

  • Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients

    Bertram L. Kasiske;Bertram L. Kasiske;Miguel A. Vazquez;William E. Harmon;Robert S. Brown

  • Two-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Belimumab in Lupus Nephritis

    Richard Furie;Brad H. Rovin;Frederic Houssiau;Ana Malvar

  • Annals of Internal Medicine A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation

    Andrew S. Levey;Juan P. Bosch;Julia Breyer Lewis;Tom Greene

  • Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Belimumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Fifty-Two-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

    William Stohl;Andreas Schwarting;Masato Okada;Morton Scheinberg

  • Belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: high disease activity predictors of response

    Ronald F van Vollenhoven;Michelle A Petri;Ricard Cervera;David A Roth

  • Impact of anesthesia on cardiac function during echocardiography in mice

    David M. Roth;James S. Swaney;Nancy D. Dalton;Elizabeth A. Gilpin

  • Acute rhabdomyolysis associated with cocaine intoxication.

    David Roth;Francisco J. Alarcón;John A. Fernandez;Richard A. Preston

  • Microtubules and Actin Microfilaments Regulate Lipid Raft/Caveolae Localization of Adenylyl Cyclase Signaling Components *

    Brian P. Head;Hemal H. Patel;David M. Roth;David M. Roth;Fiona Murray

  • Inhibition of p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Attenuates Isoflurane-mediated Neuronal Apoptosis in the Neonatal Central Nervous System

    Brian P. Head;Hemal H. Patel;Ingrid R. Niesman;John C. Drummond

  • Inhibition of cardiac myofibroblast formation and collagen synthesis by activation and overexpression of adenylyl cyclase

    James S. Swaney;David M. Roth;Erik R. Olson;Jennifer E. Naugle

  • Crystal Structure of Human Factor VIII: Implications for the Formation of the Factor IXa-Factor VIIIa Complex

    Jacky Chi Ki Ngo;Mingdong Huang;David A. Roth;Barbara C. Furie

  • G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling Components Localize in Both Sarcolemmal and Intracellular Caveolin-3-associated Microdomains in Adult Cardiac Myocytes

    Brian P. Head;Hemal H. Patel;David M. Roth;N. Chin Lai

  • Dietary protein restriction, blood pressure control, and the progression of polycystic kidney disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

    Saulo Klahr;Julia A. Breyer;Gerald J. Beck;Vincent W. Dennis

  • A pivotal phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled study of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus located in China, Japan and South Korea

    Fengchun Zhang;Sang Cheol Bae;Damon Bass;Myron Chu

  • Inflow stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts: A multicenter, prospective study

    Arif Asif;Florin N. Gadalean;Donna Merrill;Gautam Cherla

Frequent Co-Authors

Hemal H. Patel
Hemal H. Patel University of California, San Diego
Paul A. Insel
Paul A. Insel University of California, San Diego
Allan M. Lefer
Allan M. Lefer Thomas Jefferson University
Joshua Miller
Joshua Miller Northwestern University
Sushil K. Mahata
Sushil K. Mahata University of California, San Diego
William Stohl
William Stohl University of Southern California
Wolfgang H. Dillmann
Wolfgang H. Dillmann University of California, San Diego
Andreas G. Tzakis
Andreas G. Tzakis Cleveland Clinic
Chitra D. Mandyam
Chitra D. Mandyam Veterans Health Administration
Marilyn G. Farquhar
Marilyn G. Farquhar University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in Biology or Biochemistry, there are several related online programs and specialized career pathways available. Many students choose to explore fields like exercise science and kinesiology, which provide practical applications of biological and biochemical concepts. For those interested in physical fitness and human performance, an online exercise science degree offers flexible coursework and a diverse range of career options in health and wellness.

Similarly, online kinesiology programs can prepare you for careers in sports medicine, rehabilitation, or athletic training. These programs emphasize understanding body movement from scientific and clinical perspectives.

For those with advanced degrees seeking specialized certifications, nursing offers accelerated options such as the fastest post master's pmhnp certificate for psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and the 12-month fnp program online to quickly become a family nurse practitioner. These programs allow you to build on your biology or biochemistry background and transition into high-demand healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles