World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher M. Gomez

Christopher M. Gomez

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
11135
World Ranking
4525
National Ranking
2043

Christopher M. Gomez publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Gomez sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 205 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Christopher M. Gomez D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Gomez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome

    P. Trouillas;T. Takayanagi;M. Hallett;R.D. Currier

  • Restricted use of T cell receptor V genes in murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis raises possibilities for antibody therapy

    James L. Urban;Vipin Kumar;Dwight H. Kono;Christopher Gomez

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: Gaze‐evoked and vertical nystagmus, Purkinje cell degeneration, and variable age of onset

    Christopher M. Gomez;Randall M. Thompson;Jason T. Gammack;Susan L. Perlman

  • Dysfunction of the basal ganglia, but not the cerebellum, impairs kinaesthesia.

    Matthias Maschke;Christopher M. Gomez;Paul J. Tuite;Jürgen Konczak

  • Incidence of dominant spinocerebellar and Friedreich triplet repeats among 361 ataxia families

    Melinda L Moseley;K A Benzow;L J Schut;Thomas D Bird

  • Second Cistron in CACNA1A Gene Encodes a Transcription Factor Mediating Cerebellar Development and SCA6

    Xiaofei Du;Jun Wang;Haipeng Zhu;Lorenzo Rinaldo

  • C-termini of P/Q-type Ca2+ channel α1A subunits translocate to nuclei and promote polyglutamine-mediated toxicity

    Holly B. Kordasiewicz;Randall M. Thompson;H. Brent Clark;Christopher M. Gomez;Christopher M. Gomez

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 and Machado-Joseph disease: incidence of CAG expansions among adult-onset ataxia patients from 311 families with dominant, recessive, or sporadic ataxia.

    L. P W Ranum;J. K. Lundgren;L. J. Schut;M. J. Ahrens

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 knockin mice develop a progressive neuronal dysfunction with age-dependent accumulation of mutant CaV2.1 channels

    Kei Watase;Curtis F. Barrett;Taisuke Miyazaki;Taro Ishiguro

  • The Polyglutamine Expansion in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 Causes a β Subunit-Specific Enhanced Activation of P/Q-Type Calcium Channels in Xenopus Oocytes

    Sophie Restituito;Randall M. Thompson;Jacob Eliet;Robert S. Raike

  • Clinical characteristics of patients with spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3 and 6 in the US; A prospective observational study

    Tetsuo Ashizawa;Karla P Figueroa;Susan L Perlman;Christopher M Gomez

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6

    Ana Solodkin;Christopher M Gomez

  • Monoclonal anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies can cause experimental myasthenia

    David P. Richman;Christopher M. Gomez;Phillip W. Berman;Steven A. Burres

  • Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies directed against the alpha-bungarotoxin binding site induce a unique form of experimental myasthenia

    Christopher M. Gomez;David P. Richman

  • Progression of Friedreich ataxia: quantitative characterization over 5 years.

    Maya Patel;Charles J. Isaacs;Lauren Seyer;Karlla Brigatti

  • FXN methylation predicts expression and clinical outcome in Friedreich ataxia.

    Marguerite V Evans-Galea;Marguerite V Evans-Galea;Nissa Carrodus;Simone M Rowley;Louise Anne Corben

  • A β‐subunit mutation in the acetylcholine receptor channel gate causes severe slow‐channel syndrome

    Christopher M. Gomez;Ricardo A Maselli;Jason Gammack;Jose Lasalde

  • Sharing of antigenic determinants between the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and proteins in Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Possible role in the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis.

    Kari Stefansson;Michael E. Dieperink;David P. Richman;Christopher M. Gomez

  • Measuring the rate of progression in Friedreich ataxia: implications for clinical trial design.

    Lisa S. Friedman;Lisa S. Friedman;Jennifer M. Farmer;Jennifer M. Farmer;Susan Perlman;George Wilmot

  • Monoclonal antibodies against purified nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

    Christopher M. Gomez;David P. Richman;Phillip W. Berman;Steven A. Burres

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Perlman
Susan Perlman University of California, Los Angeles
Tetsuo Ashizawa
Tetsuo Ashizawa Houston Methodist
Stefan M. Pulst
Stefan M. Pulst University of Utah
David A. Lynch
David A. Lynch Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jeremy D. Schmahmann
Jeremy D. Schmahmann Harvard Medical School
Henry L. Paulson
Henry L. Paulson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Vikram G. Shakkottai
Vikram G. Shakkottai The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Sheng-Han Kuo
Sheng-Han Kuo Columbia University Medical Center
Joshua Miller
Joshua Miller Northwestern University
Thomas D. Bird
Thomas D. Bird University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Christopher M. Gomez