World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 102 495 37 179 38434

Michael S. Neuberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael S. Neuberger between 1973 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael S. Neuberger published across 54 years, from 1973 to 2026, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 2 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2000. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 8 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1973 2026

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael S. Neuberger: publications per year, 1973 to 2026
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 4
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 8
1986 4
1987 6
1988 5
1989 5
1990 8
1991 4
1992 0
1993 8
1994 5
1995 4
1996 9
1997 7
1998 8
1999 4
2000 10
2001 8
2002 10
2003 7
2004 5
2005 7
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 4
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
2023 6
2024 1
2025 1
2026 1
Total 202
Download as CSV

Michael S. Neuberger publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Neuberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 179 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110 179
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael S. Neuberger D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Neuberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29 102
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Michael S. Neuberger was affiliated with the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with emphases on various subfields including Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's published work covered key topics such as surgical site infection prevention, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, hernia repair and management, parathyroid disorders and treatments, pancreatitis pathology and treatment, COVID-19 clinical research studies, and abdominal surgery and complications.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Neuberger included Tara Mueller, Victoria Kehl, Rebekka Dimpel, Christiane Blankenstein, and Silvia Egert-Schwender.

Neuberger published in several venues repeatedly, including:

  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  • JAMA Surgery
  • Infection
  • European Urology Open Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Neuberger were:

  • Duodenal tropism of SARS-CoV-2 and clinical findings in critically ill COVID-19 patients, 2022, Infection
  • Determinants and clinical significance of negative scintigraphic findings in primary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective observational study, 2022, Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine

Additional research linked to coauthors included:

  • Intraoperative Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy, 2024, JAMA Surgery
  • Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma - real world data from a retrospective multi-center analysis, 2023, European Urology Open Science
  • Intraoperative Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Laparotomy: The Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled IOWISI Trial (DRKS00012251) of the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC CHIR-Net), 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal

Michael S. Neuberger was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse

    Peter T. Jones;Paul H. Dear;Jefferson Foote;Michael S. Neuberger

  • Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers

    Serena Nik-Zainal;Ludmil B. Alexandrov;David C. Wedge;Peter Van Loo;Peter Van Loo;Peter Van Loo

  • DNA deamination mediates innate immunity to (retro)viral infection

    Michael Malim;Ann Sheehy;Reuben Harris;Kate Bishop

  • AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification

    Svend K. Petersen-Mahrt;Reuben S. Harris;Michael S. Neuberger

  • Comparison of the effector functions of human immunoglobulins using a matched set of chimeric antibodies.

    M Brüggemann;G T Williams;C I Bindon;M R Clark

  • Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching Is Inhibited and Somatic Hypermutation Perturbed in UNG-Deficient Mice

    Cristina Rada;Gareth T. Williams;Hilde Nilsen;Deborah E Barnes

  • B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation.

    Facundo D. Batista;Dagmar Iber;Michael S. Neuberger

  • Hyperresponsive B Cells in CD22-Deficient Mice

    Theresa L. O'Keefe;Gareth T. Williams;Sarah L. Davies;Michael S. Neuberger

  • RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 and some of its homologs can act as DNA mutators.

    Reuben S. Harris;Svend K. Petersen-Mahrt;Michael S. Neuberger

  • Recombinant antibodies possessing novel effector functions

    Michael S. Neuberger;Gareth T. Williams;Robert O. Fox

  • Evolution of the AID/APOBEC Family of Polynucleotide (Deoxy)cytidine Deaminases

    Silvestro G. Conticello;Cornelia J. F. Thomas;Svend K. Petersen-Mahrt;Michael S. Neuberger

  • Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase

    Javier Di Noia;Michael S. Neuberger

  • The Vif Protein of HIV Triggers Degradation of the Human Antiretroviral DNA Deaminase APOBEC3G

    Silvestro G Conticello;Reuben S Harris;Michael S Neuberger

  • Affinity Dependence of the B Cell Response to Antigen: A Threshold, a Ceiling, and the Importance of Off-Rate

    Facundo D Batista;Michael S Neuberger

  • Expression and regulation of immunoglobulin heavy chain gene transfected into lymphoid cells.

    M S Neuberger

  • Mismatch Recognition and Uracil Excision Provide Complementary Paths to Both Ig Switching and the A/T-Focused Phase of Somatic Mutation

    Cristina Rada;Javier M. Di Noia;Michael S. Neuberger

  • A hapten-specific chimaeric IgE antibody with human physiological effector function.

    M. S. Neuberger;G. T. Williams;E. B. Mitchell;S. S. Jouhal

  • Elements regulating somatic hypermutation of an immunoglobulin κ gene : critical role for the intron enhancer/matrix attachment region

    Alexander G. Betz;César Milstein;Africa González-Fernández;Richard Pannell

  • Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH2-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting.

    Cristina Rada;Michael R. Ehrenstein;Michael S. Neuberger;César Milstein

  • Comparison of the differential context-dependence of DNA deamination by APOBEC enzymes: correlation with mutation spectra in vivo.

    Rupert C.L. Beale;Svend K. Petersen-Mahrt;Svend K. Petersen-Mahrt;Ian N. Watt;Reuben S. Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Cesar Milstein
Cesar Milstein MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Michael R. Ehrenstein
Michael R. Ehrenstein University College London
Facundo D. Batista
Facundo D. Batista Harvard Medical School
Reuben S. Harris
Reuben S. Harris The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Julian E. Sale
Julian E. Sale MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Sven Pettersson
Sven Pettersson Karolinska Institute
Roberto Sitia
Roberto Sitia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Greg Winter
Greg Winter University of Cambridge
Ashok R. Venkitaraman
Ashok R. Venkitaraman Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Michael R. Stratton
Michael R. Stratton Wellcome Sanger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open the door to varied career paths. Many students pursue additional qualifications in related fields to complement their expertise and expand job options in healthcare, research, or education.

For those interested in mental health or counseling, there are a range of cheapest masters in counseling online degrees, which offer flexibility and affordability for professionals balancing work commitments. If you’re passionate about supporting young people, consider accredited child psychology masters programs that are offered online and can lead to specialized roles in schools, clinics, or community organizations.

Students seeking a clinical route may benefit from an online masters in clinical psychology, which combines foundational theory with practical skills for helping patients. Those interested in social services can choose an online degree in human services—many programs have shorter timelines designed for swift entry into the workforce.

Combining molecular biology with relevant online degrees enhances your ability to work at the intersection of science and public service, preparing you for dynamic roles that impact health and wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Neuberger

Recently Published Articles