What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Enzyme
- RNA splicing
- Genetics
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Spliceosome, RNA splicing, Genetics, snRNP and Small nuclear RNA.
She has researched Spliceosome in several fields, including RNA-binding protein and Prespliceosome.
Her Minor spliceosome, SR protein and Spliceosomal complex study in the realm of RNA splicing connects with subjects such as Computational biology.
U2AF2 and Splicing Factor U2AF is closely connected to Prp19 complex in her research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Minor spliceosome.
You can notice a mix of various disciplines of study, such as Molecular biology and Biophysics, in her snRNP studies.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Ribonucleoprotein and SMN complex.
Her most cited work include:
- The Spliceosome: Design Principles of a Dynamic RNP Machine (1788 citations)
- Spliceosome structure and function. (1006 citations)
- Spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis, structure and function. (601 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Cindy L. Will mainly focuses on Spliceosome, RNA splicing, Cell biology, snRNP and Genetics.
Her work deals with themes such as RNA-binding protein, Alternative splicing and Small nuclear RNA, which intersect with Spliceosome.
Her study looks at the intersection of Small nuclear RNA and topics like SnRNP Core Proteins with Histone locus body.
In general RNA splicing study, her work on Minor spliceosome and Splicing factor often relates to the realm of Molecular biology and Computational biology, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
Her work investigates the relationship between Cell biology and topics such as Yeast that intersect with problems in Cryo-electron microscopy.
Her research in snRNP intersects with topics in Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and Prp24.
She most often published in these fields:
- Spliceosome (78.65%)
- RNA splicing (74.16%)
- Cell biology (52.81%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2020)?
- Spliceosome (78.65%)
- RNA splicing (74.16%)
- Cell biology (52.81%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Cindy L. Will mostly deals with Spliceosome, RNA splicing, Cell biology, snRNP and Ribonucleoprotein.
Cindy L. Will incorporates a variety of subjects into her writings, including Spliceosome, Biophysics, Intron, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Transition.
RNA splicing connects with themes related to Alternative splicing in her study.
Within one scientific family, Cindy L. Will focuses on topics pertaining to Small molecule under Cell biology, and may sometimes address concerns connected to In vitro.
Her snRNP research incorporates elements of Splicing factor and Small nuclear RNA.
Her studies in Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein integrate themes in fields like 7SK RNA, Cajal body and Precursor mRNA.
Between 2016 and 2020, her most popular works were:
- Cryo-EM structure of a human spliceosome activated for step 2 of splicing (143 citations)
- Cryo-EM Structure of a Pre-catalytic Human Spliceosome Primed for Activation (119 citations)
- Structural Basis of Splicing Modulation by Antitumor Macrolide Compounds. (56 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Enzyme
- RNA splicing
- Biochemistry
Cindy L. Will spends much of her time researching RNA splicing, Spliceosome, Molecular biology, Transition and Function.
Particularly relevant to Minor spliceosome is her body of work in RNA splicing.
Spliceosome and Small nuclear RNA are frequently intertwined in her study.
Cindy L. Will interconnects RNA Helicase A and Polypyrimidine tract, RNA Splicing Factors, RNA-binding protein in the investigation of issues within Small nuclear RNA.
By researching both Small molecule and snRNP, she produces research that crosses academic boundaries.
Her Mechanism studies intersect with other subjects such as Computational biology, Functional studies, Molecular machine, Ribonucleoprotein and Pre-mRNA splicing.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
