World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 132 171 152 107 95 457 67041

Richard R. Behringer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard R. Behringer between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard R. Behringer published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 13.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 77 publications in 2006. 15 of the 596 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 77. Peak 77 publications in 2006. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 77 publications 2007: 40 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 50 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1983 2025

596 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard R. Behringer: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 4
1988 5
1989 7
1990 7
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 8
1995 12
1996 6
1997 6
1998 9
1999 11
2000 15
2001 19
2002 16
2003 14
2004 24
2005 21
2006 77
2007 40
2008 27
2009 32
2010 19
2011 18
2012 18
2013 12
2014 9
2015 11
2016 8
2017 13
2018 12
2019 11
2020 5
2021 7
2022 14
2023 50
2024 7
2025 8
Total 596
Download as CSV

Richard R. Behringer publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Behringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 457–466 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 457 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10 457
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard R. Behringer D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Behringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 132–133 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14 132
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Molecular Biology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Richard R. Behringer is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant focus on molecular biology and genetics.

Their recent scholarly output includes publications in well-regarded scientific journals across various topics. Notable papers include:

  • 3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type (2021, Science)
  • Genome-wide bidirectional CRISPR screens identify mucins as host factors modulating SARS-CoV-2 infection (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Mammary-specific expression of Trim24 establishes a mouse model of human metaplastic breast cancer (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Chromosome size affects sequence divergence between species through the interplay of recombination and selection (2022, Evolution)
  • In vivo modeling of metastatic human high-grade serous ovarian cancer in mice (2020, PLoS Genetics)

The research addresses diverse themes including genomics, CRISPR genetic screens, cancer modeling, evolutionary genetics, and metastatic disease modeling.

Frequent co-authors provide a pattern of collaborative work in related fields. These collaborators include:

  • Virginia E. Papaioannou
  • Bonnie K. Kircher
  • Rachel D. Mullen
  • John J. Rasweiler
  • Olga Dudchenko

Behringer's publications frequently appear in specific venues known for research protocols and biological sciences. These publication venues include:

  • Cold Spring Harbor Protocols
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Differentiation
  • Science
  • Developmental Dynamics

Their primary research fields are focused on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with over 80 publications in these areas. Subfields of expertise evidenced by their work are molecular biology, genetics, public health, environmental and occupational health, ecology, evolution, behavior, systematics, and immunology.

The major topics covered by their research include:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Best Publications

  • The Novel Zinc Finger-Containing Transcription Factor Osterix Is Required for Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation

    Kazuhisa Nakashima;Xin Zhou;Gary Kunkel;Zhaoping Zhang

  • Spontaneous calcification of arteries and cartilage in mice lacking matrix GLA protein

    Guangbin Luo;Patricia Ducy;Marc D. McKee;Gerald J. Pinero

  • Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual

    Richard Behringer;Marina Gertsenstein;Kristina Vintersten Nagy;Andras Nagy

  • Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: Homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction

    Hidemasa Oh;Steven B. Bradfute;Teresa D. Gallardo;Teruya Nakamura

  • Sox9 is required for cartilage formation.

    Weimin Bi;Jian Min Deng;Zhaoping Zhang;Richard R. Behringer

  • Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation

    Pentao Liu;Maki Wakamiya;Martin J. Shea;Urs Albrecht

  • Introns increase transcriptional efficiency in transgenic mice.

    Ralph L. Brinster;James M. Allen;Richard R. Behringer;Richard E. Gelinas

  • Continuous cell supply from a Sox9-expressing progenitor zone in adult liver, exocrine pancreas and intestine

    Kenichiro Furuyama;Yoshiya Kawaguchi;Haruhiko Akiyama;Masashi Horiguchi

  • Requirement for LIml in head-organizer function

    William Shawlot;Richard R. Behringer

  • Bmpr encodes a type I bone morphogenetic protein receptor that is essential for gastrulation during mouse embryogenesis.

    Yuji Mishina;Atsushi Suzuki;Naoto Ueno;Richard R. Behringer

  • Interactions between Sox9 and β-catenin control chondrocyte differentiation

    Haruhiko Akiyama;Jon P. Lyons;Yuko Mori-Akiyama;Xiaohong Yang

  • Müllerian-inhibiting substance function during mammalian sexual development

    Richard R. Behringer;Milton J. Finegold;Richard L. Cate

  • Mouse gastrulation: the formation of a mammalian body plan

    Patrick P.L Tam;Richard R Behringer

  • The transcription factors L-Sox5 and Sox6 are essential for cartilage formation

    Patrick Smits;Ping Li;Jennifer Mandel;Zhaoping Zhang

  • Functional analysis of Sox8 and Sox9 during sex determination in the mouse.

    Marie Christine Chaboissier;Akio Kobayashi;Akio Kobayashi;Valerie I.P. Vidal;Susanne Lützkendorf

  • Osteo-chondroprogenitor cells are derived from Sox9 expressing precursors

    Haruhiko Akiyama;Jung Eun Kim;Jung Eun Kim;Kazuhisa Nakashima;Gener Balmes

  • Targeted Mutagenesis of the Endogenous Mouse Mis Gene Promoter: In Vivo Definition of Genetic Pathways of Vertebrate Sexual Development

    Nelson A Arango;Robin Lovell-Badge;Richard R Behringer

  • Fgf9 and Wnt4 act as antagonistic signals to regulate mammalian sex determination

    Yuna Kim;Akio Kobayashi;Ryohei Sekido;Leo DiNapoli

  • Insulin-like growth factor I increases brain growth and central nervous system myelination in tTransgenic mice

    Monica J. Carson;Richard R. Behringer;Ralph L. Brinster;F.Arthur McMorris

  • twist is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis.

    Zhou Feng Chen;Richard R. Behringer

Frequent Co-Authors

Andras Nagy
Andras Nagy Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Ralph L. Brinster
Ralph L. Brinster University of Pennsylvania
Richard D. Palmiter
Richard D. Palmiter University of Washington
Benoit de Crombrugghe
Benoit de Crombrugghe The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Yuji Mishina
Yuji Mishina University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patrick P.L. Tam
Patrick P.L. Tam University of Sydney
Haruhiko Akiyama
Haruhiko Akiyama Gifu University
James F. Martin
James F. Martin Baylor College of Medicine
Tim M. Townes
Tim M. Townes University of Alabama at Birmingham
Allan Bradley
Allan Bradley University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of healthcare professions, many of which offer flexible educational pathways. For those interested in blending biology with patient care, online nursing degrees are a popular option. Accelerated programs, such as the shortest rn to bsn program, allow you to earn advanced qualifications quickly, even in as little as six months.

If you're starting with an associate degree, bridge programs like the adn to fnp pathway help you progress efficiently toward becoming a nurse practitioner. Understanding how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner is essential for planning your academic journey and setting realistic career goals.

Careers linked to molecular biology and health sciences, such as Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, offer strong earning potential. If you are curious about income prospects, discover details state by state in the pmhnp salary resource. By exploring related online degrees and career trajectories, you can tailor your education to align with your interests and the evolving demands of the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Richard R. Behringer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles