World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
98
Citations
32017
World Ranking
1683
National Ranking
937

James F. Martin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Martin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 291 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James F. Martin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Martin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James F. Martin is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant emphasis on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers several topics, notably:

  • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics

James F. Martin has contributed to numerous publications, including recent papers such as:

  • ERBB2 drives YAP activation and EMT-like processes during cardiac regeneration (2020), Nature Cell Biology
  • Gene therapy knockdown of Hippo signaling induces cardiomyocyte renewal in pigs after myocardial infarction (2021), Science Translational Medicine
  • Integrated multi-omic characterization of congenital heart disease (2022), Nature
  • Epigenetic and Transcriptional Networks Underlying Atrial Fibrillation (2020), Circulation Research
  • Yap Promotes Noncanonical Wnt Signals From Cardiomyocytes for Heart Regeneration (2021), Circulation Research

The frequent co-authors working with James F. Martin include:

  • Gang Li
  • Shijie Liu
  • Fansen Meng
  • Chang-Ru Tsai
  • Jeffrey D. Steimle

The scientist often publishes their work in several key venues such as:

  • Circulation Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation
  • Nature Cardiovascular Research
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

James F. Martin is also an author of a book published by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry titled On the male species of the genus amblyteles found in New England (2021).

Best Publications

  • The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6

    Haruhiko Akiyama;Marie-Christine Chaboissier;James F. Martin;Andreas Schedl

  • Hippo pathway inhibits Wnt signaling to restrain cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart size.

    Todd Heallen;Min Zhang;Jun Wang;Margarita Bonilla-Claudio

  • Expression of Cre Recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer.

    Malcolm Logan;James F. Martin;Andras Nagy;Corrinne Lobe

  • Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins

    Jeffery D. Molkentin;Brian L. Black;James F. Martin;Eric N. Olson

  • Mef2 gene expression marks the cardiac and skeletal muscle lineages during mouse embryogenesis.

    Diane G. Edmondson;Gary E. Lyons;James F. Martin;Eric N. Olson

  • Osteo-chondroprogenitor cells are derived from Sox9 expressing precursors

    Haruhiko Akiyama;Jung Eun Kim;Jung Eun Kim;Kazuhisa Nakashima;Gener Balmes

  • Bmp2 is essential for cardiac cushion epithelial-mesenchymal transition and myocardial patterning.

    Lijiang Ma;Mei-Fang Lu;Robert J. Schwartz;James F. Martin

  • The extracellular matrix protein agrin promotes heart regeneration in mice

    Elad Bassat;Yara Eid Mutlak;Alex Genzelinakh;Ilya Y. Shadrin

  • Function of Rieger syndrome gene in left–right asymmetry and craniofacial development

    Mel Fang Lu;Carolyn Pressman;Rex Dyer;Randy L. Johnson

  • Cholesterol Modification of Sonic Hedgehog Is Required for Long-Range Signaling Activity and Effective Modulation of Signaling by Ptc1

    Paula M. Lewis;Matthew P. Dunn;Jill A. McMahon;Malcolm Logan

  • Hippo signaling impedes adult heart regeneration

    Todd Heallen;Yuka Morikawa;John Leach;Ge Tao

  • The paired-like homeo box gene MHox is required for early events of skeletogenesis in multiple lineages.

    J. F. Martin;A. Bradley;Eric N Olson

  • Cardiomyocyte regeneration: A consensus statement

    Thomas Eschenhagen;Roberto Bolli;Thomas Braun;Loren J. Field

  • Expression of mef2 genes in the mouse central nervous system suggests a role in neuronal maturation

    GE Lyons;BK Micales;J Schwarz;JF Martin

  • Bmp2 Is Critical for the Murine Uterine Decidual Response

    Kevin Y. Lee;Jae-Wook Jeong;Jinrong Wang;Lijiang Ma

  • Hippo pathway deficiency reverses systolic heart failure after infarction

    John P. Leach;Todd Heallen;Min Zhang;Mahdis Rahmani

  • Distinct functions for Bmp signaling in lip and palate fusion in mice.

    Wei Liu;Xiaoxia Sun;Alen Braut;Yuji Mishina

  • Pitx2 prevents susceptibility to atrial arrhythmias by inhibiting left-sided pacemaker specification

    Jun Wang;Elzbieta Klysik;Subeena Sood;Randy L. Johnson

  • The Hippo pathway in the heart: pivotal roles in development, disease, and regeneration.

    Jun Wang;Shijie Liu;Todd Heallen;James F Martin;James F Martin

  • Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes

    Shuo Ting Yen;Min Zhang;Jian Min Deng;Shireen J. Usman

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric N. Olson
Eric N. Olson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Xander H.T. Wehrens
Xander H.T. Wehrens Baylor College of Medicine
Brad A. Amendt
Brad A. Amendt University of Iowa
Kirill V. Larin
Kirill V. Larin University of Houston
Richard R. Behringer
Richard R. Behringer The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Vincent M. Christoffels
Vincent M. Christoffels University of Amsterdam
Randy L. Johnson
Randy L. Johnson The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Patrick T. Ellinor
Patrick T. Ellinor Harvard University
Fen Wang
Fen Wang Texas A&M University
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open up a wide range of professional opportunities, especially within the rapidly growing healthcare sector. Many students interested in life sciences later pursue advanced online degrees to expand their career options or move into specialized roles in healthcare management, pharmacy, or nursing.

For those who want to transition into leadership and administrative positions, exploring the top cahme accredited mha programs is a smart step. These programs are ideal for biology and biochemistry graduates looking to develop management skills for healthcare facilities.

If you are interested in a clinical doctorate but prefer a flexible, non-traditional structure, consider the best online dnp programs that don’t require on-site clinicals. Alternatively, an online phd in healthcare management can help you gain expertise in research, policy, and organizational leadership.

For those aiming for a clinical pharmacy career, pursuing pharmd online programs offers flexibility and a solid pathway toward becoming a licensed pharmacist.

Each of these online degree pathways provides unique advantages to biology and biochemistry graduates who want to broaden their influence in the health sciences field.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles